Wednesday, December 14, 2011



Can anyone still have doubts that re-electing him is saying bye, bye to America? Read all about it!

TJ Glauthier

An adviser to Barack Obama who played a key role in developing the energy provisions of the so-called stimulus bill has served on the boards of several companies that recently received government funds, including hundreds of millions in "stimulus" money.

TJ Glauthier served on Obama's 2008 White House Transition Team. He is widely credited with helping to craft the energy provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the "stimulus."

In addition to serving on the boards of major energy companies, Glauthier previously held two presidential appointments during the Clinton administration.

He was the Energy Department's deputy secretary and chief operating officer, the second-highest ranking official.

Earlier, he served in the White House for five years as the associate director for natural resources, energy and science in the Office of Management and Budget.

Everything you wanted to know about Obama's advisers, in "Red Army: The Radical Network that must be defeated to save America."

Glauthier is tied to several energy companies that benefited from the "stimulus" bill he helped to craft.

One such company investigated by WND is GridPoint Inc., where he was appointed to the board in March 2008. GridPoint provides utilities with software solutions for electrical grid management and electric power demand and supply balancing.

The "stimulus" provides $4.5 billion for so-called smart grid projects. GridPoint has benefited from scores of smart grid deals funded by the "stimulus" bill.

The company partnered with the Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation (eTec), Nissan, the Idaho National Laboratory and others in a project to deploy electric vehicles (EVs) and their charging infrastructure in five states. The Energy Department had awarded eTec almost $100 million in "stimulus" funds to support the project.

GridPoint's role in the eTec project was to supply smart charging and data logging capability to utilities located in strategic markets of eTec's program in Arizona, California, Oregon, Tennessee and Washington.

GridPoint also benefited from "stimulus" funds when it recently provided home energy management, load management and electric vehicle management software solutions for a KCP&L's Green Impact Zone SmartGrid Demonstration in Kansas City, Mo. The project was the recipient of stimulus funding.

Additionally, GridPoint helped the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, or SMUD, manage power from its customers' rooftop solar panels.

The Arlington, Va.-based company had landed a contract to help the Sacramento, Calif.-based municipal utility manage renewable power integration, energy storage and home energy management systems. SMUD had won $127.5 million in stimulus funds from the Department of Energy to carry out the project, which also includes deploying 600,000 smart meters in its service territory.

Also, in early 2009, the Energy Department awarded Argonne National Laboratory nearly $2.7 million in stimulus funding for three solar-energy related research projects. In addition, Argonne reportedly shared another $5 million in stimulus funding for projects with GridPoint and other companies and the University of Illinois Sustainable Technology Center.

Besides benefiting from stimulus grants, GridPoint last year won a $28 million contract with the United States Postal Service to install energy management systems in selected post office locations across the U.S.

Glauthier, meanwhile, also had come under fire after Fox News reported the U.S. Navy has purchased 450,000 gallons of biofuel for about $16 a gallon, or about four times the price of its standard marine fuel, JP-5, which has been going for under $4 a gallon.

And HotAir reported last week that Glauthier is a "strategic adviser" to Solazyme, the California company that is selling a portion of the biofuel to the Navy.

HotAir noted Solazyme received a $21.8 million grant from the 2009 stimulus package.

Also, writing at BigGovernment two weeks ago, Whitney Pitcher found that prior to serving as adviser to Solazyme and after his time as part of Obama's transition team, Glauthier served on the advisory board of SunRun, a solar financing company.

In October of 2010, just a few short months after Glauthier joined SunRun's advisory board, SunRun secured a $6.73 million grant from a Treasury Department stimulus program. The company was the ninth largest recipient of such programs through December 2010.

With research by Brenda J. Elliott
Read more: Outrage! Author of 'stimulus' linked to companies it helped

Monday, November 14, 2011


Next Spring, probably around March 2012, the Supreme Court of the USA (SCOTUS) will hear the case brought by some 26 States about the Constitutionality of ObamaCare.

Usually allowing ONE hour for arguments the Court will allow FIVE  and a half hours for the ObamaCare hearings!

AND it appears virtually certain that the eligibility of Obama himself to be in the Oval office will be part of the pleadings!

Happening in the middle of Obama's campaign for re-election, matters should be historic and divulge many of his secrets. His only hopes are the two judges he appointed to the Supreme Court, one of whom worked on his behalf in other procedings  before being elevated.

She may have to recuse herself, thus even  the playing field.


President 0bama, will you finally come clean on your hidden records? You know, transparency and all. We want to know Why these questions are off limits?

1. The Original Birth Certificate - Yes, the absolute original, examined and certified by three independent forensic experts.

2. Please produce your Columbia University transcripts.

3. Please, your original Columbia thesis paper.

4. Please produce your Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups.

5. Please produce your Harvard University transcripts.

6. Please produce your Illinois State Senate records including your voting record.

7. Please produce your Illinois State Senate schedule.

8. Please produce your Law practice client list and billing records/summary.

9. Please produce the locations and names of all half-siblings and stepmother.

10. Your complete Medical Records (we've only seen the one page summary released so far). Have you had drug tests done? Are you still using coke? Please, your liver function tests to clarify alcohol abuse. Have you had an AIDS test?

11. Please produce your Occidental College Transcripts. Also, any records of student aid received and under what names(s) and nationality.

11. Please show us your Parent’s original Marriage Certificate.

13. Please produce your record of Baptism.

14. Please produce your Selective Service registration records (Did you actually Register for Selective Service?) Also, why does your SS not pass e-verify?

15. Please provide us with schedules for all trips outside of the United States before 2007.

16. Please produce all Passport records for all passports, US and otherwise - before the scrubbing.

17. Can you show us a list of your scholarly articles?

18. Your SAT and LSAT test scores please. Did you even take the SAT and LSAT?

19. What's with no access to your grandmother in Kenya?

20. Please list of all campaign workers that currently are lobbyists.

21. Please produce Punahou grade school records.

22. Why are Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education?

23. Please produce page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham's divorce decree.

24. Why did you, President Barack Obama, resign from the Illinois bar and where are all of the relevant documents?

25. Why did Michelle Obama resign from the Illinois bar after only about four years of practice and where are all of the relevant documents?

Why are these records hidden? Who are you President Obama? Will these records be revealed before November 6, 2012? We the People care about our country deeply and are very concerned about a POTUS who has hidden every scrap of information about his life.

The voting public deserves to know these answers. We have many more questions, but please answer these first to show your transparency and good faith. We'll keep passing this list on until we get some answers.

Saturday, October 22, 2011


by Lawrence Sellin (Oct. 22, 2011)
The Republican Party was founded in 1854 on an anti-slavery platform and came to dominate the northern region of the country by 1858

I have received information from multiple sources that Congressional Republicans are fully aware that Barack Hussein Obama is a Constitutionally illegal President and has committed felonies both before and after occupying the Oval Office.

Specifically, Obama is not a natural born citizen and, therefore, has never been eligible for the office of President. In addition, Obama has forged his birth documents and Selective Service registration and uses a Social Security number not issued to him.

The Republican establishment has decided that challenging Obama on those issues will be ineffective and will cause complete havoc in the country.

It is clear to me that Obama and the mainstream media have been thoroughly successful using Saul Alinsky’s Rules 5 and 9 of “Rules for Radicals”:

Rule 5 – “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.

Rule 9 – “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

Republicans are fully intimidated by the Obama campaign and its supporters in the mainstream media with the certainty of being labeled and dismissed as “racists,” “birthers” and right-wing “conspiracy theorists” if they confront Obama regarding his violation of the Constitution and his felonies.

Republicans have also been intimidated by the threat of civil unrest instigated by the Obama campaign and executed by union thugs, left-wing radicals and Black Nationalist extremists.

In both cases, the Republicans have succumbed to political blackmail.

What goes unmentioned in the Republicans’ explanation is that, because of their complicity in the cover-up of Obama’s ineligibility and crimes, they are also vulnerable to political criticism and criminal prosecution.

The Republican strategy, therefore, is to challenge Obama on policy, educate the public and defeat him in the 2012 election.

Good luck with that approach, with the already anointed RINO candidate Mitt Romney and with a party platform of warmed-over platitudes and promises with post-election expiration dates.

In my opinion, regardless of who wins the Presidency in 2012, Obama’s ineligibility and his crimes will never be addressed.

Both the Democrats and the Republicans have too much to lose.


Exposure of the Obama fraud and criminal activity would reveal the depth of corruption in the two-party system.

The extent of the deception perpetrated by Obama supporters is mindboggling.

For example, attorney Leo Donofrio has evidence conclusively establishing that, during the run-up to the 2008 election, 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions referencing Minor v. Happersett (1875), the case which proves that Obama is an illegal President, were sabotaged, then republished at, the main resource on the web for all things related to United States Supreme Court holdings.

According to that report, CEO Tim Stanley was associated with “Obama For America 2008.”

Instead of instruments to promote the general welfare, the Democrats and Republicans have become the tools of an invisible government, which owes no allegiance and acknowledges no responsibility to the American people.

We have been politically disenfranchised. We have the right to vote, but we have lost control of the government.

James Jackson, representative from Georgia to the First U.S. Congress stated:

“We must confine ourselves to the powers described in the Constitution, and the moment we pass it, we take an arbitrary stride towards a despotic Government.”

Congressional Democrats and Republicans have stridden far beyond that point and now feel free to ignore our petitions and treat our beliefs with disdain.

Political expediency has clouded their judgment and obscured their view of the danger our country faces.

There are anti-democratic and anti-American forces working aggressively inside the country to bring down our republic. These forces are promoting the interests of nations hostile to the United States, of global financiers and radical Islam.

The work of these forces is facilitated by corrupt or cowardly politicians, radical leftists and by useful idiots oblivious to the fact that they are aiding and abetting American enemies, who will ultimately eradicate our freedom and way of life.

Barack Obama represents the nexus of those treacherous forces.

Nevertheless, Republican leaders are asking the American people to tolerate violations of the Constitution and ignore extensive criminality at the highest levels of government so their party can win the 2012 election.

If the Constitution and the rule of law mean so little to either the Democrats or the Republicans, then what’s the point?

A Republican victory in 2012 may mean the revocation of Obama’s most onerous policies, but will they ever address his ineligibility and crimes?

Having become complicit, I think not.

Saturday, October 8, 2011



With all the fetid stench of slime splashed down on us by the most corrupt, radical, Chicago ganster administration in our lifetimes, humor has also taken on a new twist. The twist was always there but restrained.

Now more and more people are showing their protest of the “protection racket” the Dept. of INJustice is implementing in many sensitive areas, specially with pro-Islamist bias, even to the extent of breaking the law to protect Moslems and Sharia law while suppressing Christian beliefs and freedoms.

Illegal gun running, or funding terrorists to buy them, refusing to charge and deport criminal even felonious illegals are just a sector. Even overriding Federal judiciary decisions to prevent States from implementing LAWS - puts them beyond Organized Crime and they should be charged with the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Criminal Organization  Act) statutes.

OVER-spending all OUR hard earned money as if it were theirs (free money for them) and crony financing such as the last humongous loan of nearly a HALF BILLION for a green project belonging to Nancy Pelosi’s close relative is pushing Americans to the brink.

Except the most naively ignorant and teat sucking free loaders gorging themselves at the public trough, while contributing little of nothing to the “wealth” being spread around to THEM.

Thus want Obama there to continue their free ride while they do NOT pay THEIR fair share as he insists others should.

As long as he is helping create a Caliphate of which he hopes one day to become the leader, Obama, beyond a desire to be re-elected and continue the destruction he is raining down on America and much of the world, cares nothing about the misery, pain and DEATH he is causing by his proxies like the Moslem Brotherhood he harbors inside  the White House, the Islamic regime of Iran and Syrian myriad deaths of their countrymen.

MOSTLY by some 20,000 Iranian Suppression forces exported to do this in Syria.

The slow and painful awakening of “we the people” is still being thwarted by Obama via his Islamists, Union thugs, oppressive Dept. of Injustice and corrupt Senators, who have just removed any obstacle to riding roughshod over us with their “nuclear option” change of filibuster rules.

The most urgent question appears to be whether when saner Republicans, Independents  (or coming to their senses Democrats) increase their voting presence in the Senate and vote Obama out of office next year will there be anything left to salvage from the rubble he is leaving behind!

Seriously, at this rate, not much of our financial or cultural infrastructure in America will be left - nor in much of the rest of the world.

Hope springs eternal but we are borderline already past the point of rescue! Many waiting for the final axe to fall or simply delaying the inevitable if Obama stays in office.

Having watched this happen in Iran after Khomeini took power (via Jimmuh the ideologue idiot Carter) Obama is a replay with a vengeance in spades. For those old enough to have seen or even read how Communism or the Bolsheviks took over, it’s a virtual replay of that ruthless madness, too.

He has yet to have an excuse to start killing us with any impunity.

DON'T be astonished if that comes to pass if he declares martial law and suspends or cancels elections.

No! Based on his mindsets not  such an overly fanciful  speculation.

Americans have mostly been immune from facing such gut wrenching, lethal and devastating  events and misery inside America so fail to recognize the multiple signs of what Obama is doing to them and the whole world.

Which verges on immature, ideological insanity not someone who wants to improve the world.

Saturday, September 3, 2011


By Alex Knott

ALAN NOTE: Eligibility is NOT decided by the FEC nor the Federal Government but by the individual States and by Congress AND there are NO legal provisions nor requirement NOR legal OBLIGATION for ANYBODY, at any level anywhere, to VERIFY a candidate's CONSTITUTIONAL eligibility.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) ruled Friday that a Guyana-born American citizen could file papers and raise money to run for president of the United States. But the agency also told the prospective candidate, Abdul Hassan, that his campaign may not receive federal matching funds because he was not born in America.

The FEC’s unanimous vote allows Hassan — who was born in the South American country in 1974 — to be a candidate, solicit funds and requires him to file disclosure reports for a presidential bid. However, the agency’s decision stopped short of addressing the constitutional issue of whether someone born outside the United States can be president.

Instead, the agency told Hassan he may not receive any presidential primary matching funds by quoting the Constitution, stating “[n]o Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

Hassan’s request appeared to put the FEC in the rare role of deciding a large constitutional issue that has only a few intersections with campaign finance law. The two commonly held constitutional requirements to run for president are that the candidate be 35 years of age or older and be a “natural born citizen.”

But FEC commissioners said repeatedly that their decision to define Hassan as a candidate had nothing to do with his birth country. They said that current federal election law allows for someone to be a candidate, regardless of whether they can legally hold the office they seek and that the FEC is not charged with deciding presidential criteria including one’s natural-born citizenship.

(Alan note: is this their escape tactic for avoiding responsibility for allowing Obama, whose eligibility qualification is being challenged in the courts AND NEVER VERIFIED, to run for the White House?)

“This does not mean that he can go and say ‘look the FEC has said that I am a candidate, give me money, I’m official,’” said Republican Commissioner Donald McGahn. “That is not what we do here; we don’t certify you as a candidate. That’s what the states do.”

During Thursday’s meeting, commissioners said they had trepidation about voting for Hassan’s candidacy because of how it might be perceived.

“By saying that it is okay — it does give the impression that we don’t see a problem,” said Democratic Commissioner Steven Walther. “I think that we really need to be cognizant of how this could be misconstrued.”

The FEC’s decision to allow Hassan to go through the initial steps to run for president took place outside of its normal publicly attended open meetings and instead was approved by a tally vote as commissioners tried to reach a consensus.

One of the final sections added to approved opinion states: “Notwithstanding this conclusion, the Commission expresses no opinion on Mr. Hassan’s potential liability arising out of his proposed activities under any other Federal or State law, including any laws concerning fraudulent misrepresentation. Any such issues are outside the Commission’s jurisdiction.”

“For us this is really all about what we are empowered to decide and what we are not empowered to decide,” said Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub. “Nobody is saying that it is fine and nobody is saying it’s okay for this guy to be going out and raising funds.’”

Shortly after Hassan made the request, the FEC signaled that it would decide the technicalities of filing requirements while leaving the broader issue of who can run for president to the judicial branch. In an email to Hassan on July 18, the FEC stated that he understood “that although the Commission can respond to the questions asked in [his] advisory opinion, the Commission cannot make any determination as to whether [Hassan] can, as a naturalized citizen, serve as President.”

The issue was made more contentious by comments and Internet postings by citizens, Tea Party advocates and “birthers,” who continue to press long-refuted claims that President Barack Obama was not born in America. About a dozen of these individuals wrote letters to the FEC stating that Hassan should not be allowed to run for president.

In the face of this opposition, Hassan said before the vote that he believed that the FEC was making the decision in good faith based on the facts. But he added that it would be hard for commissioners not to be “influenced by the political sensitivity of the issue.”

Hassan told Roll Call that his candidacy is not a stunt but rather an effort by a “political junkie” with various legislative interests. “I follow politics closely, but I have never held elected office,” he said. “I would admit that I am not well-known, and I would admit that my chances of winning are not as good as other candidates. That’s obvious.”

Wednesday, August 24, 2011


An Israeli news columnist is scorching Barack Obama as possibly the worst U.S. president in history, calling him "a living and breathing nightmare."

Yigal Walt of Ynetnews says Obama "is solidifying his status as the worst president in American history. The leader who promised us a bright future of peace and fraternity is leading the American empire – and the rest of the world with it – into a dark abyss."

"Ever since he settled into the Oval Office, Obama has been hopping from one disaster to the next, making every possible mistake, boosting enemies and disregarding allies while ruining everything he touches in the process," Walt writes.

"The Return of the Great Depression" warns everyone "it is not over. It has only begun" ...

He says Obama was silent when the masses hit Iran's street and threatened to topple the ayatollah's regime.

"Why should he support a struggle waged by freedom-hungry citizens against a radical Islamic dictatorship and chronic human rights violator? And so, a rare opportunity to change the face of a state that today constitutes the gravest threat to world and regional peace slipped away."

Instead, Walt says, Obama buddied up to Syrian President Bashar Assad and remained silent, again, when Assad started butchering his own people.

"For the time being, Obama keeps muttering, Assad keeps murdering, and the world keeps watching and doing nothing," Walt writes.

Obama is also criticized for allegedly eroding NATO in the effort to oust Libya's Muammar Gadhafi.

"And so, the once-intimidating NATO alliance found itself entangled above Libya's deserts for long months in a 'battle of giants' against a state whose army is sometimes reminiscent of a Jenin street gang from a decade ago," says Walt.

 "Now, with Gadhafi's rule finally drawing to an end, the president kindly took time off from his vacation to festively declare that the future is in the Libyan people's handswhile local tribes are preparing for the imminent bloodshed and al-Qaida is reinforcing its hold on the country."

Walt's blistering attack on Obama concludes with a fondness communicated for Obama's predecessor.

"The ongoing disaster called Obama may prompt some of us to apologize to another American president, one George W. Bush," Walt writes. "He was called stupid, incoherent and naive; he was said to understand nothing and know nothing – yet now it turns out that the cowboy from Texas had a much better grasp on reality than his many critics. Even if his motives were at times as naive as Obama's, the former president combined them with an iron fist, immense determination and admirable loyalty to his allies.

"Yet Bush is alread y a distant dream, while Obama is a living and breathing nightmare. Now all that's left is to wait and see whether America's citizens will be able to remove him from the White House before he destroys everything."

Read more: News column: Obama a 'living and breathing nightmare'

Monday, August 15, 2011


Question of the day :

If you can answer this correctly, you can answer the question on what action to take on raising the Federal debt ceiling.

You come home from work and find there has been a sewer backup and you have sewage up to your ceilings.

What do you do? - raise the ceilings, or pump out the shit

But of course the Democrat Party blames the Tea Party for bringing this existential threat to the attention of the people !

“If you voted for Obama the first time to prove you were not racist, vote against him this time to prove you are not an idiot.”

Los Angeles Times ^ | 8/9/11 | Andrew Malcolm

This is the 931st day of the Barack Obama presidency. (Snip) Being a Real Good Talker (RGT) helped him get the job heading the law review. And entering politics. And succeeding early there, albeit within Chicago's rigged system. And being an RGT thrust him onto the national stage at the Democratic National Convention in 2004 when delegates had the foolish notion that John Kerry and John Edwards could win. Obama is very proud of his talking. In May this year he told a Boston fundraiser: "Back in 2004, I gave a little speech here that got some attention."

“If you voted for Obama the first time to prove you were not racist, vote against him this time to prove you are not an idiot.”

Illegitimate but voted in legally (like Obama himself), yet UNCONSTITUTIONAL "Gang of 12 Committee" that will decide on the Debt Ceiling, throws over 500 Members of Congress and Senators under the bus and removes their National, constitutionally power to legislate and make laws and obliges them to be ruled by a gang of 12  VERY entrenched partisans, who collectively have received $64,000,000 IN CONTRIBUTIONS from lobbyists!

A video posted online appears to show a Verizon picketer placing his young daughter in front of an oncoming truck — presumably carrying non-union employees — and then taunting the passengers with profanity-laced statements.

Using that kind of foul language in front of a young girl, his daughter or not, is manipulative and wrong. He may or may not have a legitimate gripe but this action and also other strikers rippping apart wiring and phone equipment is wrong. Destruction by them is no better than what they claim as their grievance and their actions puts them in the wrong.

A bit like Obama ignoring dead SEAL family member requests to have no press to selfishly take advantage of  a photo opportunity.

Tuesday, August 9, 2011






Governor Sarah Palin: a different image
By Mark S. McGrew

Why all the mis-statements and vicious lies about Alaska’s Governor Sarah Palin? Why do the major newscasters show polls looking like McCain/Palin are neck and neck with Obama/Biden? Major newscasters use polls based on 700 people polled, or 1,000 people polled and in one case, less than 200 people were polled. There is no way such a small list can reflect a public opinion. I think it is fraudulent to suggest that it can.

The day after the Palin-Biden debate, major network polls were showing again, a neck and neck rating, from small polls. But,, with millions of readers ran a poll that over 550,000 readers responded to. The results, in the morning, when only 60,000 people had voted, showed Palin at 70% against Biden’s 28%. That same figure stayed the same all day long, until over 550,000 people had voted: Palin 70% vs Biden 28%.

That figure seems a more accurate portrayal of informed people. Especially when you compare it with Governor Palin’s 84% approval rating in her home State.

Why is Governor Palin so popular? It’s not her “home style” image. It’s not her looks or her winning personality or her old beauty pageants.

It is solely due to the fact that she respects and obeys her State Constitution and she respects and obeys the US Constitution. She respects and obeys the majority will of the citizens of Alaska and does what they want, not what powerful politicians or businesspeople want.

Exxon has owned some oil leases on Alaska’s North Slope for over 30 years, without developing them. Oil leases are good for 10 years and they expire, unless oil or gas is produced, and then the leases are valid as long as the production continues. Exxon has not produced any oil or gas from those leases in the entire 30 years they have controlled them. Year after year, they have filed a plan to drill and produce, but never followed through.

The State of Alaska, under Governor Palin, decided enough was enough and cancelled Exxon’s rights to those leases this past spring. Exxon was using that land as a giant storage vault for oil that they knew to be there. Their inactivity deprived Alaska of income. Which in turn, deprived the citizens of Alaska of income and services. Exxon was not doing any favors for the citizens of Alaska by simply filing development plans for 30 years, so Alaska kicked them out.

The right to bid on and control oil and gas leases in Alaska is open to any person who is eighteen years old or older. Alaska’s Constitution specifies that the policy of the State of Alaska is to “encourage the development of its resources by making them available for maximum use”.

Allowing Exxon to control those leases, without exploiting them, was in violation of the Alaskan Constitution. Exxon is still fighting in the courts to get those leases back and just may succeed.

A few years ago, after a State of the Union speech by President William J. Clinton, a man and a lady politician gave a summation after the address. The lady said, on national television, “We are not going to do things the Constitutional way anymore. We’re going to do things the practical way.” Amazingly, very few people watching “heard” what she said. It was just too bizarre to comprehend.

Television, radio talk shows, movies, newspapers, news reporters, our police, courts, teachers, professors and politicians have gone to great lengths to make the American public believe that Constitutional Rights are “just something you see on television”. I think quite a few of the “authorities” actually believe that.

Sarah Palin respects and obeys the Constitutions of both Alaska and The United States of America. This is why she is so vilified by the media liars and anti-American politicians.

When she was the Mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, she attended a meeting along with a few Republican party members of Alaska. After she spoke, one of the men, Richard Wagner, told a good friend, “She should run for Governor.” His friend kind of rejected the idea as she was

“only a small town Mayor”. But, he saw more of her and the more he saw, the more he liked. In time, they did launch her candidacy for Governor and she won. She won because of her staunch position to let the citizens of her State decide what the State should or should not do. Alaska was no longer under 100% control of the major oil companies and other corporations. The State had been retuned to the citizens who live there. What kind of a person would hate the people who did that?

Richard Wagner and his friends are some of the very few individuals, out of thousands, who have bid on oil and gas leases and actually made a decent return. They knew first hand, with 40 years experience, just how difficult it was to buck the major oil companies. Forty years of trying, taught them just how difficult it was to deal with the State of Alaska officials and employees, many of whom were major oil company loyalists and ex-employees of oil companies. They were working overtime to stifle competition from private citizens, who were legally trying to get a fair share of the incredible oil wealth of Alaska. They fought long and hard to deprive Alaskan citizens of the right to provide a decent life for their families.

Sarah Palin entered and changed the attitude and policies of her employees to give the little guys a chance. That is only one small reason why 84% of Alaskans respect her. And it is also the reason why 16% do not. In their minds, she robbed the rich to give to the poor.

But she, and Rick Wagner’s friends, and most people in Alaska had only seen the rich robbing from the poor. And they set about to change that old feudal system. And they did.

What if Sarah Palin were to win this Vice Presidential election and take her place in the new administration? What if she were to demand that our Constitution be respected and enforced? What if she demanded that libel and slander laws be enforced? What if she were to demand that all newscasters and radio talk show hosts stop lying? What if she were to demand that decency laws be enforced on movie makers and television show producers? What if she were to demand and enforce honesty in government? What if she were to enforce honesty in local governments?

We are ruled and educated by liars. What if they were to disappear?

These are the people who object to Sarah Palin. They would at the least, be out of a job, because all they know how to do is lie. At the best, they would all be put in prison for a long long time. This is why they do not want her in any position where she can change their ways.

Sarah Palin is a serious threat to the evil entities that are in control now. She is a threat to their jobs and their way of life. They stand to lose their homes and their private bank accounts.

24,000 lobbyists, just in Washington D.C. would be out of work. A lobbyist is someone who pays government officials and employees to either make a law for their benefit, or to eliminate a law that is not to their benefit. Most people call this bribery. Somehow, this system of lawmaking became acceptable and legal in the United States. If each lobbyist, doles out only $10,000 a year, each Senator and each Congressman would pocket about $400,000 a year in legal bribes. They very well may lose that source of fraudulent income with Palin running loose.

The evil doers stand a good chance of losing their freedom as well.

Sarah Palin says time after time, it never changes, “I do what the people want me to do”.

Governor Palin says, “Drill baby drill”. Why does she keep saying that?

Because the citizens of Alaska want that to happen. Why do the citizens of Alaska want to destroy their pristine wilderness with dirty nasty drilling operations?

Because, Alaska has some of the strongest environmental protection laws in the world. A person can travel all over, in and out, across the tundra of the North Slope oil fields. That person can lay his lunch on top of any pipeline and not worry about getting oil on it. That person can sit down next to or under pipeline joints and not worry about staining his pants with oil. The North Slope is CLEAN.

Caribou, Polar Bear and other wildlife populations have grown since developing Prudhoe Bay. Sarah Palin, and the people of Alaska advocate killing wolves and bears. That is because their population has grown to a point that these dangerous predators are hurting people and livestock. The predator population has to be thinned out to protect people, livestock and other wild animals.

All States control predators. She is respecting the will of the people.

Why else would citizens of Alaska want to Drill baby drill? Because it is insane not to.

A hundred miles north of Fairbanks, population 50,000 or so, are two underground natural structures that may contain 500 million barrels of oil, each.

A responsible oil producer, lacking unbridled greed and simply wanting to make a fair dollar and pass his discoveries on to the society that allowed him to make some serious money, may do something like this:

He can take three wells, costing $8 million each and send 3,000 barrels per day to the local refinery in Fairbanks. He can have the oil refined into gasoline and sell his gasoline for $1.25 a gallon to every resident and tourist in Fairbanks. The 3,000 barrels per day will supply gasoline at that price and there are still more products that can be extracted and sold from that crude oil. One barrel of oil produces, according to Chevron Oil Company, 19.4 gallons of gasoline. It costs about $20 to find oil and get it to the refinery. Selling at $1.25, the producer will earn $24 per barrel, with $4 profit which would pay for the three wells in 10 years or less.

The barrel of oil will also produce, home heating and diesel fuel 10.5 gallons, 4.1 gallons of kerosene jet fuel, 2.2 gallons of coke, 1.1 gallons of residual fuel oil, 1.5 gallons of liquefied refinery gases, 1.8 gallons of still gas, 1.4 gallons of asphalt and road oil, 1.1 gallons of raw material for petrochemicals, .4 gallons of lubricants, .2 gallons of kerosene and .4 gallons of other products that can be sold for cash.

That 42 gallons in a barrel of oil produces 44.7 gallons of sellable product, which will give the producer another $20-50 for each barrel of oil. The profit then would be $24 to $54 on each barrel, for 3,000 barrels a day, making $26,000,000 to $60,000,000 a year. Half of that will go to expenses. Those two lonely oil fields, if produced, can supply Fairbanks for Nine Hundred Years. Those two oil fields, which are small by Alaska standards, could supply $1.25 a gallon gasoline and heating fuel for all the people of Alaska for 100 years or more.

This is why Alaskans say, “Drill baby drill”. And this is why Sarah Palin strives to obey their will. That one lone man, producing oil in Alaska can give the entire State of Alaska gasoline for $1.25 and still make himself a fortune. And if he could also afford to give Alaskans $1.25 heating fuel, Alaskans would have the God given opportunity to prosper like no other State in America.

Sarah Palin wants to increase the income of her fellow citizens. Her enemies want to decrease their income. With all the oil in Alaska, Alaskans pay the highest gasoline rate in the country. If someone did offer gasoline and heating fuel at $1.25 a gallon, the average family would be able to add $200 to $500 into their family’s budget each month. Fishing and crabbing boats could save $30,000 on a six week catch. Her enemies want that money to go to Golden Parachutes for major oil company executives.

An average oil well on the North Slope of Alaska produces 3,000 barrels of oil per day. There are over 600 oil wells on the North Slope. Just 12 of those wells could produce gasoline and heating fuel for $1.25 a gallon for every citizen of Alaska.

Jobs would be created, food would be cheaper, Alaskan Salmon would be cheaper, ALL Alaskan products would be cheaper to the world wide buyers. Citizens would not have to work two jobs and have their wives work full time. They would have the time and the finances to raise their kids to be good, loyal, productive Americans, respectful of all nations on Earth. The Native people of Alaska would be able to live the kind of life they want and not have to leave their ancestral homes and migrate to the foreign culture of cities, as they are doing now.

Sarah Palin is about people. She is not about politics or corporations. She is a reflection of what the people in her State want. Isn’t this what all people on Earth want?

Why is this person demonized? There has been no proof of wrong doing provided. Newscasters and writers provide only an onslaught of unsubstantiated accusations and insults, using a well planned list of adjectives backed up with a Thesaurus. If politicians and newscasters have to lie to the public to keep us from voting for her, they are enemies of the people and enemies of our United States Constitution. They have no legal right and no business trying to persuade people who to vote for. They are “Election Tampering” certainly, with any law breaking being ignored.

The major problem in America now is that the policing authorities are out eating donuts.

What if Sarah Palin were to make them do their jobs?

People lie out of fear or because they want something that they can not get any other way.

Obviously, if the media and the politicians are lying about Sarah Palin, they have a reason. And it’s not because of her personality, or her wardrobe, or her normal family or her so called “inexperience”.

They lie about her and spread false rumors because they are afraid of her or because they want something they can not get any other way.

What if Sarah Palin were to be elected and her President were to become incapacitated?

This could be a very dangerous scenario for her enemies. Her enemies are our enemies.

Would the people of the world suffer because of her beliefs and methods?

Yes, some would suffer. But which ones?

Mark McGrew has been active in the Alaska oil business for over 20 years. His website is at or you may email him at

Friday, August 5, 2011


Yikes! Look who just endorsed Obama for four more years - Accuses GOP of 'racism, lies, economic sabotage' (August 03, 2011)
By Aaron Klein

Barack Obama at a presidential debate
at Hofstra University in New York.

It may be early in the campaign season, but the Communist Party USA already has seen fit to endorse Barack Obama for the 2012 election.

While noting he is disappointed with "some aspects" of the Obama administration's domestic and foreign policy, Sam Webb, chairman of the Communist Party USA, threw his support behind Obama's re-election bid.

In an article last week at People's Weekly World, the official newspaper of the Communist Party USA, Webb discussed the need for a third party consisting of the so-called working class and labor as well as "racially and nationally oppressed people, women, youth, immigrants, seniors, gay and straight."

Webb, however, recognized that such a party is not likely to emerge by next year.

"Millions who have to be at the core of this party still operate under the umbrella of the Democratic Party, albeit increasingly in an independent fashion," he noted.

Webb said that for communists there are major differences between Democrats and Republicans. He urged his supporters to continue to back the Democrats.

Wrote Webb: "Neither party is anti-capitalist, but they aren't identical either. Differences exist at the levels of policy and social composition. And despite the many frustrations of the past two years, the election of Barack Obama was historic and gave space to struggle for a people's agenda."

He argued that to separate from the Democrats now "would be contrary to our strategic policy of building maximum unity against right-wing extremism now and in next year's elections."

Continued Webb: "We are keenly aware of the fact that the agenda of the far right is to bring this administration and country to its knees, with a heavy dose of racism, lies and economic sabotage, setting the stage for a full blown return to power of the most reactionary, racist, anti-labor, anti-women, homophobic and militarist grouping in U.S. politics."

"We want no part of that," wrote Webb. "We don't have any illusions about the Democratic Party, but we don't have any illusions about the Republican Party either."

Webb concluded: "Furthermore, we are also aware of the undeniable fact that no other party besides the Democratic Party stands a chance of beating the GOP next year."

Communist party covers up support for Obama

Last November, the Communist Party USA was caught scrubbing its website of references that stated it "actively supported" President Obama's election, as WND reported.

An article posted on the party's official website on Dec. 30, 2007, previously stated, "Our Party actively supported Obama during the primary election."

The article was referring to Obama's 2004 election to the Senate. It detailed how the African-American community and trade unionists played key roles in defeating the "ultra right."

(Screen shot of original article)
"This was also reflected in the historic election of Barack Obama. Our Party actively supported Obama during the primary election," stated the article, a screen shot of which was captured by the New Zeal blog. The website has since been scrubbed of the reference to the Community Party USA aiding Obama, with the article now reading simply, "This was reflected in the historic election of Barack Obama."

WND previously reported the official magazine of the Communist Party USA had lauded the important role of labor unions in electing Obama to the presidency in 2008.

The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, or AFL-CIO, sponsored a poll showing union members supported Obama by a 68-30 margin and strongly influenced their family members.

According to the survey, Obama won among white men who are union members by 18 points. Union gun-owners backed Obama by 12 points, while union veterans voted for Obama by a 25-point margin.

In the general population, Obama lost these groups by significant margins.

Political Affairs, the Community Party USA's magazine, quoted AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, a longtime member of the Boston chapter of the Democrat Socialists for America, expressing hope labor unions can continue working with Obama.

"The election is just step one in delivering the change we need," Sweeney said. "Working men and women are poised to keep the energy pumping to help the Obama administration lead the change we need. There will be no gap or letdown."

The communist magazine said priorities for labor unions are "regulating Wall Street and restoring fairness to international trade," as well as "health-care reform" to provide coverage to "nearly 50 million people without insurance and make medical care affordable for all."

Communists map out Obama agenda

Immediately following the November 2008 presidential election, WND reported the Communist Party USA mapped out policies crucial for Obama to push through in his first term, including a "single payer" socialist health-care system; laws to make joining a labor union easier; raising the minimum wage and increasing labor union support.

In May 2009, WND reported the leader of the Communist Party USA declared that with Obama as president, health care and the economy can be "reformed," U.S. troops can be evacuated from the Middle East, a second stimulus bill can be passed, the criminal justice system can be overhauled and union rights can be expanded.

"All these – and many other things – are within our reach now!" exclaimed Webb in a New York banquet speech for the People's Weekly World, the official newspaper of the Communist Party USA.


Sunday, July 31, 2011


November 2006 .....8.5 Trillion Democrats win over Congress
January 2007 ........8.7 Trillion Democrats in charge of Congress
November 2007 .....9 Trillion
January 2008 .........9.2 Trillion
November 2008 ....10.5 Trillion Democrats & Obama in Control
January 2009 .........10.6 Trillion
January 2010 .........12.3 Trillion


 2010 .....13.7 Trillion Republicans win over US House BUT NOT SENATE

January 2011 .........14 Trillion Republicans control US House only 
                                                                                     Democrats continue CRAZY spending

July 2011 ...............14.3 Trillion

Saturday, July 16, 2011


March 16th, 2006 - Every Senate Democrat - who VOTED "NO" to raise the debt ceiling and risk DEFAULT - are now - under runaway drunken spending demanding the GOP caves to their demands and White House threats to with-hold payments to our citizens rather than cut out and cut down SPENDING!

These are who voted against a debt ceiling inrease. (Some no longer there!)

Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Burns (R-MT)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Clinton (D-NY)
Coburn (R-OK)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Ensign (R-NV)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Obama (D-IL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)

They NOW claim that not voting for the raising of the deficit AND RAISING TAXES is RECKLESS but REFUSE to acknowledge that the WILD spending by lunatic ideologist OBAMA and his administration is EVEN MORE RECKLESS since we can get around a default. We have had our government shut down a few times and under REPUBLICAN captainship came through with flying colors - NOT A DEFAULT!

And we are still financing IMF (International Monetary Fund) with HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of tax dollars and to support GREECE in the BILLIONS, the UNITED NATIONS in billions AND while we cannot pay for essential roads and infrastructure in the USA we are paying some 150 BILLION to RESTORE AND REPAIR, REBUILD MOSQUES - YES, ISLAMIC BUILDINGS IN EGYPT AND ELSEWHERE WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Friday, June 24, 2011


By Jim Hoft (with editing by AntiMullah)

This was absolutely awful.

Barack Obama made another horrible mistake today. The president visited the 10th Mountain Division today and congratulated them on their service. Then he told the soldiers that he had given the Medal of Honor to Jared Monti who came back from Iraq alive. Jared Monti was actually killed in Iraq in 2006. How sad.

“First time I saw 10th Mountain Division, you guys were in southern Iraq. When I went back to visit Afghanistan, you guys were the first ones there. I had the great honor of seeing some of you because a comrade of yours, Jared Monti, was the first person who I was able to award the Medal of Honor to who actually came back and wasn’t receiving it posthumously.“

Blackfive caught the president’s horrible gaffe.

As we all know, SSG Sal Giunta, of the 173rd Airborne, was the first and ONLY living recipient EVER IN USA HISTORY  (2011) of the MOH who fought in Iraq/Afganistan. SFC Jared Monti, 10th Mountain Division, was KIA in Afghanistan in 2006. He was posthumously awarded the MOH by Obama in 2009.

How does the "Commander-in-Chief" mix these heroes up? He put that medal around Giunta’s neck and he stood with Monti’s parents as they grieved.

We have a 25th Amendment, Article 4 individual in the Oval Office, who needs to be removed from office for inability to carry out the responsibilities of the office of President. Unless aiding and abetting our enemies has been recently added to those duties. In that he does very well.

Thursday, June 16, 2011



Much information has been reported – and much more still is being sought – about Barack Obama’s original birth documentation and whether it reveals his eligibility to be president under the Constitution’s requirement those in the Oval Office be a “natural born Citizen.”

But under the radar of most news organizations a case has been moving forward in Washington, D.C., through which California attorney Orly Taitz is seeking the original application for Obama’s Social Security number, a document that could reveal a multitude of factors about the president’s early life.

U.S. District Court Chief Judge Royce Lamberth this week rejected a defense concern over procedure in the dispute, and Taitz told WND today the case has moved into discovery and she can issue subpoenas to those holding the documentation she is seeking.

For those who never wondered about how Social Security Numbers are generated, the first three digits represent the state of the applicant’s mailing address. In other words, if you applied for a Social Security Number while living in Connecticut, for example, the first three digits of your SSN will correspond to the Connecticut code.

The first three digits of Obama’s SSN are 042. That code of 042 falls within the range of numbers for Connecticut, which according to the Social Security Administration has been 040 through 049.

The national news media has been virtually silent on this potentially criminal fact.
Indeed, when Fox News finally attempted to explain it, it broadcast false information and then scrubbed it from its website.

When WND asked the White House about it, then-Press Secretary Robert Gibbs dodged the question.

Taitz’ case is against Social Security commissioner Michael Astrue and explains that because of the multitude of questions surrounding Obama’s eligibility, his birth certificate and his other records, the Freedom of Information Act request was submitted.

The Social Security Administration rejected it, and that decision was affirmed by a district court ruling that found the administrative procedures still had a course to run. But that now has been completed and the case is before Lamberth again.

He ruled this week that FOIA actions “are exempt” from a local court “meet and confer” requirement and he gave Astrue 30 days to file “any dispositive motions.”

The federal government had argued that Taitz’ process to subpoena individuals with access to the long-sought documentation was out of order, but the court ruling means it is within procedures.

According to a report in the Post & Email online blog, Taitz reported, “We’re now in discovery, so I can issue subpoenas.”

That is a level that no other case challenging Obama’s eligibility or birth certificate ever has reached.

She said she already has contacted the Hawaii Department of Health, which is custodian of Hawaiian records, about her requests, and she said another recipient very well could be the White House.

She noted that White House Counsel Robert Bauer resigned that post on June 2, and suggested Bauer might not have wanted to be deposed regarding questions about Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth,” a document presented to the nation as genuine when the White House released it on April 27 Taitz suggested that Bauer’s move back into private practice may have been speeded by worries over the eligibility dispute.

In fact, Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., and author of “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President,” said he’s convinced Bauer’s move is because he fears the “Certificate of Live Birth” document would not stand up to the scrutiny of any serious investigation.

Corsi believes Bauer “felt compelled” to resign because of the growing substance to worries that the eligibility issue will blow up into a full-scale investigation.

“Bauer sent Perkins and Coie attorneys to Honolulu to pick up from the Hawaii Department of Health what he believed would be two certified copies of Obama’s 1961 long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate,” Corsi said. “When the White House released to the public the birth certificate in the form of a PDF computer file obviously created on Adobe software and a Xerox copy, Bauer realized the Hawaii DOH had participated in the fraud.”

He said he had been tipped off early in February that a long-form birth document for Obama had been forged and that the document was to be released. As WND has reported, there long have been concerns about the Social Security number.

“There is obviously a case of fraud going on here,” says Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels. “In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”

“There is obviously a case of fraud going on here,” says Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels. “In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”

Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?
“Never,” Daniels told Corsi. “It’s against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security Number issued.”

Daniels said she is “staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama’s use of this Social Security Number is fraudulent.”

“A person who wants to hide their true identity often picks up the Social Security Number of a deceased person, thinking that nobody would ever look into it,” Daniels added. “I think it was sometime in the 1980s that Obama decided to hide who he really is.”

ALAN NOTE: assuming he even knows!

There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.

Nor is there any suggestion in Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” that he ever had a Connecticut address.

Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.

An affidavit filed by Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson specifies that as a result of his formal training as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law enforcement, “it is my knowledge and belief that Social Security Numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence.”

Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security Number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.

“I doubt this is President Obama’s originally issued Social Security Number,” she told WND.

“Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security Number in Hawaii.”

The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice-cream shop still was in operation one year after Obama’s inauguration.

Just last month some 11 months after WND began publicizing Obama’s Connecticut-based SSN, Bill O’Reilly of the Fox News Channel briefly addressed the issue while reading his viewer mail on the air.

Unfortunately for O’Reilly, the news anchor falsely asserted the president’s father lived in Connecticut.

In his viewer email segment April 13, O’Reilly was asked: “What about Obama having a Connecticut Social Security Number? He never lived there.”

“His father lived in Connecticut for several years,” O’Reilly claimed, adding that “babies sometimes get numbers based on addresses provided by their parents.”

In reality, there is no evidence Barack Obama Sr. ever lived in Connecticut. He left Hawaii in 1962 to study at Harvard in Massachusetts and then returned to his home country of Kenya.

When WND publicized O’Reilly’s major error, the information vanished from the Fox News Channel’s website, as well as

The website, responding to complaints by Fox podcast customers that O’Reilly’s Social Security claim, broadcast on Fox, had gone missing from the audio archive, trumpeted the headline:

“Busted: Fox News scrubbed Bill O’Reilly’s 4/13 mailbag segment on Obama’s Social Security Number reserved for Connecticut applicants.”

The site added, “Not only did Fox News scrub the podcast, they also left out the viewer email about Obama’s Social Security number at O’Reilly’s website.  I report, you decide!”

Friday, June 3, 2011


The author of the best-selling "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President" charged today the resignation of White House counsel Bob Bauer is the result of his participation in the release of Barack Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth," which he fears would not stand up to the scrutiny of any serious investigation by the FBI, Congress or the media.

When the announcement about Bauer's departure was made today, the AP said he was returning to private practice and to represent Obama as his personal attorney and as general counsel to Obama's re-election campaign.

Jerome Corsi's new book, "Where's the Birth Certificate?," is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore.

He's being replaced by Kathy Ruemmler, a former assistant U.S. attorney.

The AP reported Obama praised Bauer, who before his White House post had defended Obama against lawsuits that challenged his eligibility to be president.

But Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., who authored the "Where's the Birth Certificate?" book that debuted at No. 6 on the New York Times best-sellers list after reaching No. 1 several weeks earlier at, said, "I think Bauer's resignation marks the beginning of the Obama eligibility cover-up starting to unwind."

Corsi believes Bauer "felt compelled" to resign because of the growing substance to worries that the eligibility issue will blow up into a full-scale investigation.

"Bauer sent Perkins and Coie attorneys to Honolulu to pick up from the Hawaii Department of Health what he believed would be two certified copies of Obama's 1961 long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate," Corsi said.

"When the White House released to the public the birth certificate in the form of a PDF computer file obviously created on Adobe software and a Xerox copy, Bauer realized the Hawaii DOH had participated in the fraud," Corsi charged.

Corsi said he had been tipped off early in February that a long-form birth document for Obama had been forged and that the document was to be released.

"The information came from a mole within the Hawaii DOH who had been examining the vault logbook for months," Corsi explained. "Until just prior to February 24, no Obama long-form hospital-generated birth record could be found in the Hawaii DOH."

Corsi, whose book also has ascended to the upper reaches of other best-seller tabulations, said that when Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie "could not find the Obama birth records he had been searching for and radio journalist Mike Evans said so in a broadcast repeated over a series of radio stations across the nation, a decision was made within the White House to use a forgery that may have been in the works since as early as 2008."

Corsi said he believes the scenario developed this way:

Obama and Valerie Jarrett wanted to continue the stonewalling strategy they had used since 2008, relying on the short-form Certification of Live Birth and having Hawaii DOH claim that long-form birth certificate copies were no longer available, not even to Obama.

Obama and Jarrett had planned to use the forged birth certificate as an October surprise, just prior to the November 2012 election, if the pressure on Obama's eligibility remained an obstacle to his reelection.

But this strategy was overruled by White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley. He determined that a birth certificate, if it existed, had to be released now – to prevent the issue from gaining momentum.

"I believe both Daley and Bauer believed until recently that Obama was telling the truth and that the birth certificate was really there in the Hawaii DOH," Corsi said. "But when they realized that the last-modified date stamp on the computer file of the Obama birth certificate – put up on the White House website on April 27 – was that very same morning, it contradicted the idea the file was an earlier scan of the original Obama birth certificate in the Hawaii vault log book. What modifications to the file were being made at the White House?

Was the file originally created at the White House? Why wasn't the file made and closed in Hawaii where the scan of the original document was supposedly made? Bauer realized the White House was lying to say a scan of the original document was being released."
Corsi said he's convinced that now top White House operatives such as Daley and Bauer believe there is no document in the Hawaii Department of Health that can withstand forensic analysis.

He said the legal challenges to a specific document that has been made public could be harder to deflect than a lawsuit generally alleging an ineligibility on Obama's part.

Corsi also said he believes top operatives in the Democratic Party "have concluded that if Obama does not kill the birther issue soon, he may have to resign – with the likelihood that Hillary Clinton will be elevated into the DNC presidential candidate in 2012."

Corsi suggested Republicans also are staying away from the "birther" issue because they have reached the same conclusion – and the RNC does not want "to have to face Hillary in the 2012 presidential election in the wake of an Obama resignation."

"What forced the release of the birth certificate on April 27 was the coming publication of the [Where's the Birth Certificate?] book," said Corsi.

"Bauer's resignation is the first step in the crumbling of inside support for Obama in the White House."

Corsi said pursuit of the "forger" who created the Obama Certificate of Live Birth already is well under way.

"The forgery consists of a composite of these various Hawaii 1961 legitimate documents, onto which was added Obama-specific information, with the result that the final version was composed in Adobe software," Corsi said.

WND reported when Bauer joined the White House.

Obama announced at that point he was waiving ethics rules for Bauer, his personal and campaign lawyer – and the same attorney who has defended Obama in lawsuits challenging his eligibility to be president.

But Executive Order 13490, "Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Personnel," prohibits political appointees from participating in any matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to former employers or former clients. The rule typically expires two years after the date of appointment.

According to the ethics waiver posted on the White House website, Bauer was exempted from the requirements of the ethics pledge "solely with respect to his former client the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and with respect to his former employer Perkins Coie LLP (Perkins Coie) in its capacity as counsel to the DNC and to President Barack Obama in his personal capacity."

The waiver suggested the ethics rules would have prevented Bauer from working on Obama's financial disclosure forms or issues related to the Democratic National Committee.

As WND reported, in April 2009, Bauer sent a letter to plaintiff Gregory Hollister of Hollister v. Soetoro, a retired Air Force colonel, threatening sanctions if he didn't withdraw his appeal of the eligibility case that earlier was tossed by a district judge because the issue already had been "twittered."

"For the reasons stated in Judge Robertson's ruling, the suit is frivolous and should not be pursued," Bauer's letter warned. "Should you decline to withdraw this frivolous appeal, please be informed that we intend to pursue sanctions, including costs, expenses and attorneys' fees, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 and D.C. Circuit Rule 38."

Bauer also represented Obama and the DNC in Philip Berg's eligibility lawsuit and various other legal challenges.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Bauer functioned as an "attack lawyer," threatening with FEC complaints groups wanting to run anti-Obama television ads.

Also during the 2008 presidential campaign, Bauer as counsel for the Obama campaign wrote letters to television station managers and to Department of Justice Assistant Attorney General John Keeney arguing that airing an anti-Obama ad pointing to the known association between Obama and Weather Underground radical Bill Ayers would violate federal election rules.

Additionally, during the 2008 campaign, Bauer intervened on behalf of Obama to block the California-based American Leadership Project from running a television ad campaign over support from unions, including the Service Employees International Union.

Again, Bauer filed a complaint with the FEC alleging that the union-funded television campaign the American Leadership Project planned to run in Indiana against Obama was illegal under federal election laws.

In addition to representing Obama on eligibility cases, Bauer also served as legal counsel to represent the president in the criminal probe into the activities of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

Read more: Author: 'Birth certificate' prompts departure of White House counsel

Monday, May 30, 2011


Any wonder the troops have such little regard for Obama?

Token visit to Arlington then more golf.

Did anyone notice he was disgracefully chewing gum during the Joplin, Missouri

church service for those who had lost their lives and everything they owned?

Saturday, May 14, 2011


According to this article no-one knew "Obama" at Columbia.

(But heck, we're all just racist birthers...yea right! ) | 10/18/2009 | Alan Peters

Posted by kellynla

Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there, but none remembered him.

Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me.

I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia. Ever! Nobody recalls him. I'm not exaggerating, I'm not kidding." Root adds that he was also, like Obama, "Class of '83 political science, pre-law" and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him.

At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me.

No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, the macha who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him. Is that not strange?

It's very strange." Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia.  

NOTE: Root graduated as Valedictorian from his high school, Thornton-Donovan School, then graduated from Columbia University in 1983 as a Political Science major (in the same class as President Barack Obama WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN IN)"