tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-70563903380701991452024-03-13T14:15:36.129-07:00RUTHLESS ROUNDUPAlan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.comBlogger307125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-27128280166502252652012-07-28T18:12:00.001-07:002012-07-28T18:20:35.695-07:00OBAMA'S GANGSTER REGIME<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgzoZYxvOVleafxU0QPZuEGR3kbKAuLQmlDFUPNCFYsWgqcHKxk_a3BK0vr9Vje9IGTzcG3idP2UmPwEtYc5ppztIlZLnp_8AHH2G51NRpBYKSVy2Z-D3DKGywM6JDmIqnVoDGYJEkkkLo/s1600/execution.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgzoZYxvOVleafxU0QPZuEGR3kbKAuLQmlDFUPNCFYsWgqcHKxk_a3BK0vr9Vje9IGTzcG3idP2UmPwEtYc5ppztIlZLnp_8AHH2G51NRpBYKSVy2Z-D3DKGywM6JDmIqnVoDGYJEkkkLo/s1600/execution.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">ROGUE EXECUTION BY ANOTHER GANGSTER REGIME<br />
<span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;"><b>Potentially </b></span>coming to your neighborhood<br />
under a second Obama term<br />
and his lawless One Million Man Civilian Security Force</td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
<br />
<center style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Arial;"><i><b><br />
</b></i></span></center><center style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Arial;"><i><b><br />
</b></i></span></center><center style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: black; font-family: Arial;"><i><b>Gangster Government, and Sakharov's Immunity</b></i></span></center><span style="font-family: Arial; text-align: -webkit-left;"><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> </span><br />
<center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><i><b>Matthew Bracken, February 29, 2012</b></i></center><br />
<br />
<center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>* * 1 * *</b></center><br />
<b style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">For over a year now, the Department of Justice has been stone-walling the House committees investigating Operation Fast And Furious,</b><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> wherein thousands of semi-automatic rifles ("assault rifles" in the liberal lexicon) were deliberately allowed to "walk" into Mexico, straight into the hands of drug cartel killers. One of those weapons was used to murder Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry a dozen miles inside of U.S. territory. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">The actual killer is believed to be an FBI "informant." In other words, a cartel assassin in his own right, but also a valuable "asset" in the FBI's consideration. The FBI and DOJ have been shielding this killer, while obstructing the delivery of justice to the Brian Terry family. On the other side of the border, ICE Agent Jaime Zapata was also murdered with a "gun-walked" weapon, along with over three-hundred innocent Mexican citizens as of this date. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">And where is the elite Mainstream Media in its coverage of this festering scandal of such epic proportions? Over the past year they have dedicated scant minutes to the scandal, and then, usually to parrot the Obama administration's lies and obfuscations. Just during one recent week, the elite media spent countless hours covering the death and funeral of a beloved celebrity drug addict, compared to the few minutes they have spent covering Operation Fast And Furious during all of the last year. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Under Operation Fast And Furious, and related DOJ-ATF gun-walking schemes in at least five states, there was no plan or means to track the weapons after their sale. Licensed gun dealers were coerced by the BATFE into making repeated bulk sales, even when they expressed grave concern about the persons buying the weapons, including known felons. Federal cash was provided to the straw purchasers when they did not have their own money. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">As conceived and carried out, the intended purpose of Operation Fast and Furious was to rack up a bloody body count in Mexico, in order to discredit the Right to Keep and Bear Arms as spelled out in the Second Amendment of the Constitution. The murdered Mexicans were intended to buttress the false claim that ninety percent of the weapons recovered in Mexico after gangland shootings came from American gun dealers. </span><br />
<br />
<b style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">In short, the Obama administration conducted a program of mass murder for political purposes.</b><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> Or, as President Obama put it to Sarah Brady, he was still pursuing a gun control agenda, but "</span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">under the radar</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">." It is hard to conceive of a federal "law enforcement operation" [sic] more evil from top to bottom than Operation Fast And Furious. </span><br />
<br />
<center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>* * 2 * *</b></center><br />
<b style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">By comparison, consider the Watergate scandal,</b><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> which at the time was generally called "a third-rate burglary." I was a teenage construction worker the summer of 1973 when the Senate Hearings took place. Out on the construction sites, you could hear radios playing the hearings all through the day. The radio and television networks suspended normal programming in that pre-cable era to bombard America with gavel-to-gavel coverage of the Watergate hearings. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">We all know the result of that non-stop media focus: President Nixon soon resigned in disgrace to avoid impeachment, and U.S. Attorney General John Mitchell was sent to prison. And all over a bungled political burglary, where nobody was killed or even hurt. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">But imagine for a moment if President Nixon's men, when called before the committees investigating the Watergate scandal, had provided less than twenty percent of subpoenaed documents after a full year of ignoring requests and congressional pleadings. Then further imagine that among the twenty percent of the documents that were provided to Congress, hundreds of pages were "fully redacted," or completely blacked out. Black paper, by the ream. </span><br />
<br />
<b style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">In diplo-speak, this is leaning across the witness table toward the congressional investigators, giving them two middle fingers and a hearty, "<i>F--- you, you punks, what are you going to do about it</i>?" </b><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Then imagine if the New York Times, the Washington Post and the television networks never mentioned Watergate or the hearings, except rarely, and then only to refer to the congressional investigators as partisan hacks on witch-hunts, simply bent on destroying the nation's beloved President Nixon and stopping his good works. In this alternate reality, Woodward and Bernstein never got a Watergate by-line, but instead they were sent to cover the new "ecology" movement and Earth Day. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Reverse the party polarity, jump ahead four decades to today, and that is the current sad state of American reality. Gangsters rule the federal government; the Operation Fast And Furious congressional investigators are ineffectual, toothless buffoons, and their spineless congressional leaders even balk at further investigation of the deadly scandal. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">In the modern case of Operation Fast and Furious, hundreds of Mexicans were murdered as a necessary pre-condition for a desired political outcome, the undercutting of Second Amendment rights in America. From the outset, the administration's goal was to bury our Right to Keep and Bear Arms beneath a growing mountain of Mexican corpses. The innocent murdered Mexicans were not collateral damage of Operation Fast and Furious, they were the intended targets from the start. </span><br />
<br />
<b style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">Murdergate, plain and simple.</b><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Dear readers, it does not get more evil than that. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Attorney General Holder and his lieutenants have repeatedly lied and are repeatedly caught lying, so they make up more lies, bald-face lies, contradicted by email records and their own words. But no charges of perjury ensue from Congress, only more extensions of meaningless deadlines to produce the subpoenaed documents and all of the witnesses who have been called to testify, but who have simply refused to appear. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Two middle fingers, and a hearty "F--- you." </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">And not only does the elite Mainstream Media ignore the story, thereby shielding the Obama administration from answering for Operation Fast and Furious or many other administration scandals, they actually take an active role in promulgating the latest messages put out by the Obama White House. One recent blatant example will suffice. Most viewers were bewildered at the Republican primary debate in New Hampshire on January 7, when moderator George Stephanopoulos of ABC News asked, and continued to ask, seemingly off-topic questions about the candidates' views on, of all possible subjects, </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>birth control.</b></i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">We now understand that current White House War Room "General" Valerie Jarrett has been conducting weekly planning meetings with representatives from the hard-left Media Matters, for the purpose of delivering the latest administration "talking points" and strategic memes to their cooperating friends in the elite media and thereby to the public at large. Then lo and behold, the original Clinton White House War Room "General" George Stephanopoulos just happened to pick debate questions not about Operation Fast And Furious, but, of all things, </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">the birth control meme</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> that the Obama White House wanted to float, as a diversion from discussing the perilous state of the economy. And wildly successful it has been, this meme-making machine, at keeping the Republican candidates off-message and off-balance. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">A horribly biased media that will not even investigate Operation Fast And Furious will certainly not investigate this grossly transparent act of political prostitution by "journalist" George Stephanopoulos. In graphic terms, this was not merely discreet political sex for a quiet off-camera payoff; this was naked, grunting copulation at high noon, on the public square. Even so, today almost nobody will say aloud what needs to be said: George Stephanopoulos has now </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">proven</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> himself a political whore of the lowest stripe, but even worse than that, he has shown himself to be a serving member in good standing of Gangster Government, Inc. And his colleagues in the elite liberal media establishment are fine with that, because they are also complicit, either knowingly or unknowingly. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">George Stephanopoulos does the political bidding of Valerie Jarrett and Media Matters, making him a willing stooge and a critical cog in Gangster Government, Inc., thereby disgracing both his family name and the occupation of journalist. He will go down in history as a dishonorable scoundrel, who put his shared liberal political agendas ahead of any bare pretense at making an honest search for the truth concerning deadly scandals such as Operation Fast and Furious, which by objective measures is the worst political scandal of the modern era. </span><br />
<br />
<center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>* * 3 * *</b></center><br />
<b style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">Let's return to Watergate.</b><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> When the activities of the Nixon White House "Plumbers" became known, a vigorous media examination provided the clean water and bleach to quickly disinfect the mess and restore the integrity of government institutions. Officials as high as the U.S. Attorney General went to prison, and President Nixon was forced from office in abject disgrace. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">However, nothing like that happens today, under the willfully averted gaze of "state-controlled media." Operation Fast and Furious, a scandal that is demonstrably orders of magnitude worse than Watergate, gets a complete pass. The MSM is too busy covering the latest celebrity escapades to be bothered with mere mass-murder, carried out as an intended part of a federal "law enforcement operation" [sic] at the Obama administration's direction. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">How may we understand this total disinterest by the elite liberal media in President Obama's own Murdergate? Gangster Government, Inc. cannot thrive unless it can depend on its loyal GGI affiliates in the elite media. Without the looming threat of investigative reporting, Gangster Government is protected on its flanks, and is empowered to advance. The elite media becomes a willing shield for the gangsters, instead of a check against their depredations, all the while claiming objectivity in their reportage. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: yellow; color: black; font-size: x-small;"><b>In effect, the elite liberal media pisses on our heads and tells us it is raining,</b> </span><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">and then expects us not only to believe their lies, but to be happy about them. However, out here in the Bitter Clinger Nation, we do indeed see what is happening in sharp detail, and we know that it is not rain that is coming down. We understand, but we are simply unable to change the situation. Not when the elite media itself becomes a key part of the cover-up of </span><b style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">Murdergate</span></b><span style="background-color: white; font-size: x-small;"> and other manifestations of <b><span style="color: red;">Gangster Government, Inc. </span></b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="background-color: white; color: black;">Why spend so much time on this comparison between the Watergate scandal and Operation Fast and Furious? Because it is the Rosetta stone for understanding how </span><b style="background-color: yellow; color: black;">Obama's Gangster Government </b><span style="background-color: white;">came creeping in, bent on turning the United States into a socialist total control grid, where vestigial scraps of American freedom will be doled out by the State to obedient subjects. When a Gangster Government is </span><b style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: red;">not opposed by an honest media or the threat of meaningful congressional hearings</span></b><span style="background-color: white;">, it is emboldened and it advances. This is the outcome of President Obama's new policy of </span><b style="background-color: yellow;">ruling by executive decree</b><span style="background-color: white;">, and his repeatedly stating that, "If the Congress won't act, I will." </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">"So what?" you may ask. "We live in a corrupt age, so we have a corrupt government. And not for the first, or the last time." </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">No, I'm sorry, but this is </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">not </i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">the same as anything seen before. Hold on to the example of Watergate: a third-rate political burglary, under a constant media spotlight, leading to the end of a presidency, and an attorney general in prison. Compare that to Operation Fast And Furious: a covert policy of mass murder for political benefit, followed by feeble congressional investigations, with exactly zero elite media interest. It is an objective metric to compare Watergate to Murdergate. The current lack of accountability leaves the Obama administration emboldened to move further away from adherence to the Constitutional limitations they swore to uphold. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: yellow; font-size: large;"><b style="color: black;">"If the Congress won't act, I will," may be translated into standard English as, "To hell with the Constitution, I am in charge, and nobody can stop me."</b><span style="color: black;"> </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Gangster Government, Inc. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">We have reached a sickening point in our history, when an FBI "informant" shot and killed a U.S. Border Patrol Agent with an AK-47 "walked" to the cartels as part of Operation Fast And Furious. The only part of this that did not go exactly according to the plan cooked up in the Obama White House is that the "walked" rifle killed a U.S. federal agent in America, instead of just one more Mexican in Mexico. The murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry at least spilled a bit of light on the murderous operation, but not enough. More than a year later, the cover-up is holding firm, with the willing assistance of the elite liberal media in blocking the reportage of any news injurious to the Whitehouse. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">(This is not the first time, by the way, that FBI "informants" were allowed to commit murder while receiving FBI protection. It recalls the Irish mobs in Boston who were given FBI protection for over twenty years, in particular the Whitey Bulger gang. It has taken the FBI decades to mitigate the stink of their long-term participation in the Boston Black Mass, which included covering up numerous murders by their "informants.") </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Now the FBI is running <b><i><u>"informants" in Mexican cartels</u></i></b>, who receive FBI protection, even after they murder U.S. agents in the United States. This ongoing lamentable situation will dishonor every faithfully serving FBI Special Agent as long as it is allowed to continue, just as it also dishonors the memory of murdered Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. </span><br />
<br />
<center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>* * 4 * *</b></center><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Dear readers, we are at a precarious point in our history. When I wrote </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>Enemies Foreign And Domestic</b></i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> in 2002, I was not making wild guesses. I was studying historical and recent foreign examples. When a Gangster Government is left unchecked by a complicit elite media, it is an entirely foreseeable consequence that federal "law enforcement" [sic] agencies will conduct the types of false-flag and other black ops described in my novel EFAD, and actually conducted under the DOJ's Operation Fast And Furious. Power unchecked is power abused. Without the threat of significant media examination or congressional oversight, what do the gangsters have to fear? Nothing at all. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Look to the recent experiences of countries in Latin America to project what will come next--if it is not already occurring sub-rosa. There will be officially unsanctioned operations that are launched after a wink and a nod from the upper floors. Criminal "informants" seeking large cash payments or stay-out-of-jail cards (or both) will handle the "wet work" on a deniable basis. Rogue units like the Special Training Unit described in EFAD will far overstep any Constitutional bounds, and sally forth on both personal and political vendettas, seeking to destroy those they cannot silence, with no regard for the rule of law, and no fear of being held to account by the complicit elite liberal media. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">All of this will happen, just as surely as mushrooms will sprout forth from horse manure in a dark place. It is what </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">always</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> happens, when a Gangster Government veering toward outright fascism is assisted by a compliant press. Study the past decade in the political life of Venezuela, to see America's future. Secret police, and eventually even death-squads made up of "off-duty" agents and their cartel and street gang "informants" will proliferate. Violent street mobs mobilized and directed by federal instigators through cutouts will be unleashed on political enemies, while the Feds and the elite liberal media study their fingernails. These are a few examples of what </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">always</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> happens under these conditions. It is as predictable as the swing of a pendulum. Don't wonder. </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>This is what comes next.</b></i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="background-color: white;">Data-mining programs will provide these abusers of power with powerful tools for creating enemies lists, and for targeting them, as described in EFAD. Social media networks are already under intensive federal scrutiny. This year, it is ostensibly to track down undefined terrorist threats. But social media, so popular today, must be understood as a two-edged sword. The same social media that facilitated the Arab Spring, today</span><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: red;"> <b>brings the secret police of Syria, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia and other nations to the doors of obscure bloggers hidden in tiny apartments, to drag them away to secret torture cells. </b></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">The point is that social media works both ways, and analyzing their traffic patterns is currently a booming sector in federal law enforcement. This year, unnamed groups of terrorists are the reason given for all of the new federal law enforcement "fusion centers." Next year or the year after, other classes of political enemies may be placed on the federal microscope's slide as political circumstances evolve. Gangster Government, when it is unconcerned about being held to account, always moves forward to greater levels of outright repression. </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">Always.</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> </span><b style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">Power unchecked, is power abused.</b><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">The ratchets restricting our freedom click tighter. People are afraid to speak, for fear of winding up on a list, and what that might mean in the years ahead under a Gangster Government. Your spouse desperately needs an organ transplant or other critical operation? Gee, sorry, not available, not to you, not now. </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">Not to a political enemy</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">, they will mean but not say. Therefore, you had better shut up and get with the program, if you know what is best for you. That compliant and fearful attitude is the intended outcome of Gangster Government, Inc. It needs a silent and submissive nation of frightened sheep to thrive unchecked. </span><br />
<br />
<b style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">However, some of us will just not get the word.</b><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> We will not all shut up and play ball, so at the next stop along this express railroad to overt fascism, <b><i><u>the regime's political enemies will be targeted for assassination</u></i></b>. But not necessarily in the 1963 or 1968 meaning of the word. That is, not by "kinetic solutions," to use today's favored expression. Today, assassination comes in many subtler forms. </span><br />
<br />
<center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>* * 5 * *</b></center><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Which brings me at last to </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>Sakharov's Immunity.</b></i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> Andrei Sakharov was a Soviet physicist and a primary inventor of the H-bomb. When he went off the Communist reservation in 1967 and became a dissident, the regime made his life miserable but they did not kill him, which was certainly in their power to do. His death under such circumstances would have proved the very points he was making about the illegitimate Soviet regime. They moved him far into Siberia to keep him isolated from intrepid foreign visitors, <b><i><u>but they did not sprinkle radioactive Polonium dust on his salad. The introduction of that deadly form of Russian salad dressing was left for a later strongman, Vladimir Putin, formerly of the KGB. </u></i></b></span><br />
<br />
<center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><img src="http://www.enemiesforeignanddomestic.com/andrei.jpg" /></center><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">And there are many other means of assassination. The Soviet KGB could not assassinate Sakharov's reputation; it was above reproach. But in the modern era, with the elite liberal media serving as the Obama regime's willing propaganda organ (</span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">birth control, anyone?</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">) this is easier to arrange than ever. Popular media icons can be and have been driven off the airwaves by the full-court press of the Media Matters smear machine, in coordination with Valerie Jarrett at the White House War Room. And does anyone believe that the vicious smear campaign against black conservative Republican candidate Herman Caine was not orchestrated in the War Room of Gangster Government, Inc? </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Or the regime can commit an "Economic Waco," the way it has recently done to the Rick and Terri Reese family of Deming, NM. Read about this case, and ponder this federal engine of total destruction being turned against your family. At the same time the secret federal "law enforcement program" [sic] of walking thousands of guns directly to Mexican cartel killers was official ATF policy, and nobody has even been charged with a crime. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">Obviously, taking a defiant public stand against Gangster Government Inc. and its complicit elite media minions comes with some risk. They can drop a large building on you if they want to, just as they did to the Reese family in New Mexico, and grind you under their boot heels. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">So why do I stand and point my accusing finger at Leviathan? Perhaps those dissidents with a sufficiently high profile will earn some measure of Sakharov's Immunity, at least for a while. Certainly keeping a low profile is no guarantee of protection from being railroaded and destroyed, as the gut-wrenching case of Rick and Terri Reese clearly demonstrates. Needless to say, the elite liberal media has no interest in covering their physical and economic crucifixion by the federal government. </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">Please </i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">read about their case; it will make you sick to your stomach that this kind of official abuse can happen in the United States of America. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">So if maintaining a low profile does not promise safety from the organs of state destruction, perhaps keeping a high profile will. I am pinning a lot on this </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>Sakharov's Immunity</b></i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> idea. But if it is my fate to serve as one of the canaries in the coalmine of freedom, so be it. I am in good company, standing with many genuine heroes. You already know many of them, but it is not for me to name them here. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">[</span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">March 2 addendum: One of them, Andrew Breitbart, died yesterday of "natural causes," at the unnaturally young age of 43, while alone on a walk near his home.</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">] </span><br />
<br />
<center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>* * 6 * *</b></center><br />
<b style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">And a final note to federal law enforcement officials and special agents:</b><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> More than any other group of Americans, I wish that you would please read my 2003 novel </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>Enemies Foreign And Domestic. </b></i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">(If you know a federal law enforcement agent, please forward this essay to him or her.) </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">I know that most of you depend greatly on your federal paycheck, and look forward to receiving your federal pension. Millions of us are in a similar boat. We all have bills to pay and kids to feed. However, while you ponder your need for your federal paycheck, please remember that the FBI, the flagship of federal law enforcement agencies, also stands for </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>Fidelity, Bravery, and Integrity. </b></i><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">If you are being asked or encouraged to perform dishonorable or unconstitutional acts, remember, it often takes a lot of </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">bravery</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> to remain </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">faithful</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> to your core value of personal </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">integrity.</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> Remember always that you swore a solemn oath to defend not a Fuhrer, or a Fatherland, or even a desired ideological outcome, but the Constitution of the United States. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">This means that if you are instructed by a supervisor like the fictional Wally Malvone to engage in dirty tricks and black ops (like those that actually took place under Operation Fast And Furious, AKA </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">Murdergate</i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">), you are both duty and honor bound to blow the whistle, like the brave ATF Special Agents who remained faithful to their oaths and preserved their integrity. There can be no more of protecting killers because they are federal law enforcement agency "informants," like the members of the Whitey Bulger Irish mob in Boston, or the FBI "informant" who was the likely assassin of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in Arizona. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">As a faithful agent who believes in your oath, it is your duty to root out and extirpate the rot and filth of political corruption, which is far more dangerous to our Republic than the corruption of mere personal greed. You must remain vigilant to the danger that your agency will become fully politicized, transforming over time into an American KGB or Stasi. Please reread the oath you swore before accepting your gold shield, especially the part about </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>domestic enemies. </b></i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">If you willingly become a Stasi or a KGB man, if a job is a job and you just follow orders, then that domestic enemy is </span><i style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><b>you,</b></i><span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;"> and trust me on this, many of us are watching these developments very carefully and with great trepidation. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: x-small;">You see, countless tens of millions of us also took our own versions of that same oath when we joined the military or law enforcement, and our oaths did not come with an expiration date. </span><br />
<br />
<center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><i><b>Matthew Bracken</b><br />
<br />
February 29, 2012</i> </center><center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;"><br />
</center><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLPsaxjdzG-qUJSR9_YctiESL_mXLVsrxcQHUb2PdxZIdzx8n75wj2ye_c9a61p0r6ZCFodpxYwuAxaHw3JW1uAp-r1G6GhEsPwyUj1ytNqx73RHiJznTwbUyVU0sWgLBw17VaZ2AzklI/s1600/Matt+Bracken.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="268" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLPsaxjdzG-qUJSR9_YctiESL_mXLVsrxcQHUb2PdxZIdzx8n75wj2ye_c9a61p0r6ZCFodpxYwuAxaHw3JW1uAp-r1G6GhEsPwyUj1ytNqx73RHiJznTwbUyVU0sWgLBw17VaZ2AzklI/s320/Matt+Bracken.bmp" width="320" /></a></div><center style="background-color: white; color: black; font-size: small;">MATT </center></span></span>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-81927679532263179662012-06-17T13:24:00.000-07:002012-06-17T13:24:05.641-07:00ISLAMIC MIND SETS THEY WANT TO IMPOSE ON YOUEgyptian Islamists have announced Moslems must STOP eating TOMATOES as they carry a<br />
Christian symbol (the Cross) on them.<br />
<br />
In Iraq, vegetable vendor have been forbidden to display cucumbers next to tomatoes on their stalls so as not to offend Islam and excite women by this pornographic juxta-positioning.<br />
<br />
Iran has closed down a cinema and officially sealed the doors to PREVENT WOMEN from watching the international soccer matches when en are present! "We cannot have our womenfolk together with men watching this kind of scene.<br />
<br />
Iranian law enforcement authorities are patrolling neighborhoods to prevent this happening in private homes while games broadcast on TV.<br />
<br />
<i>Indonesia and Malaysia also have some mind-boggling sharia laws. </i><br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
In one case, a Hindu man of Indian origin was ordered by the Islamic courts to DIVORCE his Moslem wife with whom he had had SIX children because Moslem women had NO RIGHT to marry non-Moslem men.<br />
<br />
Have fun and Google "Sharia laws" and related words like "Moslem women and non-Moslem men"Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-34186920852674506362012-05-13T18:44:00.003-07:002012-05-13T19:00:21.510-07:00DESPICABLE DHIMMIS: LEON PANETTA AND GENERAL MARTIN DEMPSEY<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><a href="http://barenakedislam.com/2012/05/12/military-leaders-who-are-teaching-that-islam-is-the-enemy-should-be-given-promotions/" target="_blank"><b>Military leaders who are teaching that Islam is the enemy should be given promotions</b></a></span></span><o></o><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br />
</span><br />
<br />
Instead, the terrorist-supporters from CAIR are calling for their dismissal as well as eliminating anti-Islam training materials, all of which are factually correct. The only people who should be dismissed, if not court martialed, are the ones who leaked the training materials to the media and CAIR.<br />
<br />
The Traitor in the White House is systematically destroying our military and its ability to defend us. If we do not kick his Muslim Marxist ass out of office, we will all be bowing to Islam four years from now.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjmqWhGKas1zEt4zljLDBV98HZS_1nkdl4N9ses4LJVLPCx9BZMQfE50B8VhArVXhaOrg3_JBcpRjQdLIO55VpSBIiD0eZdq8Ze6xIyFrf6vASGHa3T-J4ueizbke9p7uKVX7Lf13VeZkM/s1600/dempsey.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjmqWhGKas1zEt4zljLDBV98HZS_1nkdl4N9ses4LJVLPCx9BZMQfE50B8VhArVXhaOrg3_JBcpRjQdLIO55VpSBIiD0eZdq8Ze6xIyFrf6vASGHa3T-J4ueizbke9p7uKVX7Lf13VeZkM/s400/dempsey.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><br />
<br />
TWO despicable dhimmi Muslim ass-kissers: Obama's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, right, talks to reporters alongside (Communist) Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta at the Pentagon in April. Commenting on a military training class containing anti-Islam sentiments, Dempsey called the course "totally objectionable."<br />
<br />
MSNBC Emerging details of inflammatory anti-Islam materials used in U.S. military training have prompted a chorus of outrage from civil rights and American Muslim groups, and growing demands for the dismissal of military leaders associated with the course, and for other actions to address the issue.<br />
<br />
The materials, first detailed by Wired.com, used in an elective course at the Joint Forces Staff College in Norfolk, Va., promoted "total war" against Muslims in order to stave off terrorism. The course, "Perspectives on Islam and Islamic Radicalism," raised the option of "taking war to a civilian population," in disregard of the Geneva Convention of 1949, and possibly destruction of Mecca and Medina, Islam’s holiest sites.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RHxaTgkoW4"><span style="color: cyan;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RHxaTgkoW4</span></a><br />
<br />
"This is Abu Ghraib by power point and lectern," said (radical leftist atheist) Mikey Weinstein, president of the nonprofit Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), referring to the scandal that erupted in 2004 after the surfacing of torrid pictures of U.S. troops abusing prisoners in Iraq. "It’s even worse than Abu Ghraib. What they are talking about is essentially genocide," of Muslims.<br />
<br />
The military announced a review of its training materials and canceled the "Perspectives" course in late April. The action came after an FBI review resulted in the elimination of reams of materials that were found to be discriminatory against Muslims, treating the whole population with suspicion.<br />
<br />
The details coming to light from the the 8-week course at an elite military institution — taught to officers since 2004 — have shocked even those who have long complained about discrimination against Muslims.<br />
<br />
Instructor Lt. Col. Matthew Dooley, the main focus of the criticism, taught that the Geneva Conventions that set standards of armed conflict are "no longer relevant. "This would leave open the option once again of taking war to a civilian population wherever necessary (the historical precedents of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki being applicable...)."<br />
<br />
Dooley’s materials mock the notion of "moderate Muslims." He taught that the growing number of mosques and Islamic centers in the United States would generate more adherents to use "violent jihad" in pursuit of Islamic domination.<br />
<br />
The course materials admit that the actions and views included will not be seen as "politically correct."<br />
<br />
Indeed, the courses contradict U.S. government positions — as represented internally and to U.S. allies in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere — that while the country is fighting Islamic extremists, it is not at war with the religion or its adherents as a whole.<br />
<br />
On Thursday, the Chair man of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, <b><u><i><span style="color: red;">Obama appointee</span></i></u></b>, General Martin Dempsey called the course "totally objectionable" and "against our values."<br />
<br />
Dempsey told reporters at the Pentagon that Lt. Col. Dooley was no longer teaching, but has<br />
kept his job at the college, a top post-graduate professional military institution that serves students from around the world.<br />
<br />
Among the organizations calling for Dooley’s dismissal from the college is the Council on American Islamic Relations.<br />
<br />
"It is imperative that those who taught our future military leaders to wage war not just on our terrorist enemy, but on the faith of Islam itself be held accountable," wrote CAIR national executive director Nihad Awad in a letter to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. "These shocking revelations are completely out of line with the longstanding values of one of our nation’s most respected institutions."<br />
<br />
The Arab American Anti-Discrimination Committee is urging the Pentagon to recall and retrain military personnel who have been subjected to the anti-Islam material.<br />
<br />
"It’s very troubling,” Abed Ayoub, ADC legal director, told msnbc.com. "You’re sending American soldiers overseas with these trainings and these biases ... I think there definitely should be a study as to what impact these trainings have had on their actions."<br />
<br />
Weinstein, from MRFF, asserts that Dooley and others in his chain of command who knew about the course materials or should have known about the material should face court-martial.<br />
<br />
"MRFF calls for the immediate dismissal of Lt. Col. Dooley, as well as an immediate condemnation, deeply probing investigation, and swift trial by courts-martial of those responsible for allowing content advocating genocide to be used to indoctrinate future leaders within the U.S. armed forces," he told msnbc.com.<br />
<br />
Atheist Leftist Weinstein, a former Air Force judge advocate general, or JAG, believes the course is merely a symptom of a larger problem. In recent years he has campaigned against the military’s invitation of speakers that are known for virulent anti-Islam views. "This is simply a small cancer cell that is rapidly metastasizing," he said. "This is representative of a larger more sinister force which is fundamentalist Christianity." <b><span style="color: red;">(This atheist POS thinks Christianity is bad but Islam is good)</span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwq1VUtuCj0"><span style="color: cyan;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwq1VUtuCj0</span></a>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-72891688715897895882012-03-26T15:58:00.001-07:002012-03-26T16:02:33.393-07:00OBAMA STYLE MANUFACTURED RACE WARFARE FOR ELECTION PURPOSES <br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqYyEh15uzP84zsMf5pSewicksMJEusK2NtzI6oVL8wBbiquV1MBkEtLUOnngUfIKafWlO-51FIcc8CCSFYacNyj3F5ReB6ynaYFKPVM3yQmnjdvk6Swa-qZ2l5Y7i_T3dCxNa3TE_cuc/s1600/treyvon+1.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img aea="true" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqYyEh15uzP84zsMf5pSewicksMJEusK2NtzI6oVL8wBbiquV1MBkEtLUOnngUfIKafWlO-51FIcc8CCSFYacNyj3F5ReB6ynaYFKPVM3yQmnjdvk6Swa-qZ2l5Y7i_T3dCxNa3TE_cuc/s1600/treyvon+1.png" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">ORIGINAL PHOTO</td></tr>
</tbody></table> <strong><span style="font-size: large;">The media also fills their articles with outdated baby-faced pictures of Trayvon. Very few include that he was <span style="color: #cc0000;">a towering 6'2” football player</span>. Is the media really reporting the news, or is this classic agitation/propaganda </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: large;">to advance a political agenda.</span></strong><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjSOZ45p8K-e4Ideakf-PhA7e3LbDuVOiTFfulc5cAccNsmMdK9VvvahudirPNgOtnR0nW29eLik4qODpmuigB5GirecETpV9_G-Wgeg5aFOJaMwQJjNJgAemfURBX-gKg3Ol_gWNJW02o/s1600/treyvon+2.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img aea="true" border="0" height="225px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjSOZ45p8K-e4Ideakf-PhA7e3LbDuVOiTFfulc5cAccNsmMdK9VvvahudirPNgOtnR0nW29eLik4qODpmuigB5GirecETpV9_G-Wgeg5aFOJaMwQJjNJgAemfURBX-gKg3Ol_gWNJW02o/s400/treyvon+2.png" width="400px" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">DOCTORED/SOFTENED PHOTO USED BY PRESS</td></tr>
</tbody></table> <br />
<br />
<strong><em><u>Last weekend in the city of Chicago alone, gangbangers slaughtered ten people and wounded another forty.</u></em></strong> <br />
<br />
The youngest fatality is only six years old. The youngest person wounded is only one-year-old. Many of the victim were pedestrians sprayed with bullets in drive by shootings. The national news has said nothing about this.<br />
<br />
So why does one shooting in Florida warrant weeks of national news? Why have there been thousands of articles a day, for the last four days, about one single shooting?<br />
<br />
Almost all of the news items about George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin contains a combination of false statements, opinions presented as facts, transparent distortions, and a complete absence of some of the most relevant details. <br />
<br />
Almost all news items are written solely from the point of view of the grieving family. The media also fills their articles with outdated baby-faced pictures of Trayvon. Very few include that he was a towering 6'2” football player. <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">Is the media really reporting the news, or is this classic agitation/propaganda to advance a political agenda.</span></strong><br />
Literally thousands of articles contain at least one false statement in the first couple of lines. They usually read "George ZImmerman, a white man," or "shoot by a white man." <br />
<br />
Zimmerman is described by family as a multiracial Hispanic. His appearance is clearly that of a Latino/Mestizo individual. However, the media wants him to be white because that better fits the political narrative they are trying to artificially create. <br />
<br />
Many news articles have also claimed the neighborhood is "mostly white." This is also a lie. The neighborhood is only 49% white. It is over half non-white.<br />
<br />
All the way back on February 27th, the local Orlando Fox station interviewed the witness who dialed 911. Almost none of the thousands of articles since have mentioned any of the details described by the witness. Some, however, have attributed false statements to this witness. On March 16th, the Sanford police department released new details to the Orlando Sentinel. Once again, these details have been ignored or changed by the media.<br />
<br />
1.The witness reports that George Zimmerman was on the ground and <strong><u>Trayvon is on top of him punching him.</u></strong><br />
<br />
2.The witness says that <strong><em><u>George Zimmerman was screaming and yelling for help</u></em></strong>.<br />
<br />
3.Police arrive and find Zimmerman bleeding on his face and the back of his head. He also has had grass stains on his back. All this confirms the story told by Zimmerman and the witness.<strong><span style="color: yellow;"> (And broken nose).</span></strong><br />
<br />
4.Police play the 911 tape for Trayvon <span style="color: yellow;"><strong>Martin's father</strong>, <strong><em><u>who tells police that the voice screaming is <span style="color: red;"><span style="background-color: yellow;">not</span> </span>the voice of his son.</u></em></strong></span><br />
<br />
<strong><u>The neighborhood this took place in has seen a lot of crime.</u></strong> Would you be surprised to learn that there were eight burglaries, nine thefts, and a shooting just in the past year? <br />
<br />
In fact, the local homeowners' association reports that George Zimmerman actually caught one thief and aided in the apprehension of other criminals. <br />
<br />
The Miami Herald wrote about this on March 17th. None of the thousands of articles and cable news segments that came after, thought this was important.<br />
<br />
In fact the Miami Herald goes on to interview neighbor, Ibrahim Rashada, who is black. Rashada confirms that there has been <strong><em>a lot of crime in the neighborhood and indicates to the reporter that the perpetrators are usually black.</em></strong><br />
<br />
The media also characterizes Trayvon as a "model student." <strong><em><u>In fact, he under a five day suspension when the shooting took place.</u></em></strong> <strong><span style="color: yellow;">(Apparently a more serious TEN days).</span></strong>That is why he was staying at a house so far from his school on a school night. A laywer for Trayvon's family has blocked access to his school records. However, you have to do something pretty bad to get suspended for five days.<br />
<br />
Now that you know the suppressed facts of the case, you can for form a better more balanced opinion. Maybe you still think Zimmerman was wrong to pull the trigger. However, I think you will come to the conclusion that the "mainstream" clearly is pushing an agenda. Even when they have to grossly alter and adjust a story to fit that agenda.<br />
Continue reading on Examiner.com Zimmerman was on the ground being punched when he shot Trayvon Martin - Charleston Charleston Conservative | Examiner.com <a href="http://www.examiner.com/charleston-conservative-in-charleston-sc/zimmerman-was-on-the-ground-being-punched-when-he-shot-trayvon-martin#ixzz1qGVdHV5u"><span style="color: cyan;">http://www.examiner.com/charleston-conservative-in-charleston-sc/zimmerman-was-on-the-ground-being-punched-when-he-shot-trayvon-martin#ixzz1qGVdHV5u</span></a>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-74561133408633586742012-03-21T13:03:00.000-07:002012-03-21T13:03:54.086-07:00AMERICANS STRESSING OUT<a href="http://alanpetersnewsbriefs.blogspot.com/2012/03/stressing-in-america.html">http://alanpetersnewsbriefs.blogspot.com/2012/03/stressing-in-america.html</a>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-52630455487554613812012-03-17T14:24:00.001-07:002012-03-17T14:27:53.662-07:00s-EVIL-ious SEBELIOUS<strong><span style="font-size: x-large;">Kathleen "s<span style="color: red;">EVIL</span>ious" Health and Human Services Secretary Sebilius - a frighteningly intrusive, evil woman in charge of so much of our misery! </span></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="font-size: x-large;">And increasing future ill-health as her and Obama's weird, radical and scandalous policies kick in. Specially TIMED to kick in AFTER the elections, where if they get in <span style="color: red;">again</span>, <em><u>able to ignore American voters for FOUR years</u></em>, America is <span style="color: red;">doomed</span> financially, morally, culturally, religiously and almost TOTALLY <em><u><span style="color: #cc0000;">deprived</span></u></em> of our long standing Constitutional freedoms!</span></strong><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><strong><span style="background-color: yellow;">After Film Warning Kids Not to Call Others 'Jerks,' Sebelius Tells Kids to Say: 'You're Being a Jerk'</span></strong> </span><br />
<br />
By Penny Starr<br />
<br />
Immediately after showing middle-school students a new video from the Cartoon Network that admonishes children not to call people names like "stupid," "fat," and "jerk," Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told the students <strong><em><u>they could do a lot of good by telling some students they were "jerks." </u></em></strong><br />
<br />
It "can make a huge amount of difference," she said. <br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9wyAAz5GVCj3aG8tIziSjvdjLEEgeHuCFZzu0a67rIFwPhB4Q3LszaNdRuAhAn17XNyEjRhOdOw0GoJt83UtsVHKEzZf9qzPcLDK5FLEZJbLGd8K5gkWLIx_LFUoRfv8kZIIwlRPvRsA/s1600/Kathleen+Sibellius.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img aea="true" border="0" height="200px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9wyAAz5GVCj3aG8tIziSjvdjLEEgeHuCFZzu0a67rIFwPhB4Q3LszaNdRuAhAn17XNyEjRhOdOw0GoJt83UtsVHKEzZf9qzPcLDK5FLEZJbLGd8K5gkWLIx_LFUoRfv8kZIIwlRPvRsA/s320/Kathleen+Sibellius.png" width="320px" /></a></div><br />
Sebelius' <strong><span style="color: yellow;">OFTEN VERGING ON LUNACY</span></strong> remarks came in response to a question from CNN’s Don Lemon, who served as moderator of a panel discussion following a screening of “Stop Bullying: Speak Up.” <br />
<br />
The audience was comprised of children at the Stuart-Hobson Middle School in Washington, D.C. The students, from the 6th to 8th grade, <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">were given black t-shirts with the “Speak Up” logo to wear at the assembly. </span></strong><br />
<br />
“What do you think is the best advice for people who are going into watching this film and anyone who is watching?” asked Lemon. <br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaMtM3kPowY6KV1bjl3ko605wGzxE9l9Wvxo6GeHb2baJLMU_9KpHv6G2TkhrvOYBsifaLbNZ37xOvPGInZRL2Lbn2vT_-dDRU5CanYGbgOFdvAJATYRT-uME9B5E90evygXX-0XuBQ-A/s1600/jerk-pic-1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img aea="true" border="0" height="400px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaMtM3kPowY6KV1bjl3ko605wGzxE9l9Wvxo6GeHb2baJLMU_9KpHv6G2TkhrvOYBsifaLbNZ37xOvPGInZRL2Lbn2vT_-dDRU5CanYGbgOFdvAJATYRT-uME9B5E90evygXX-0XuBQ-A/s400/jerk-pic-1.jpg" width="277px" /></a></div><br />
As part of her answer, Sebelius said: “I think, very important, is for kids to understand how powerful you really are. You might feel like you’re not big enough, not strong enough, not--don’t have enough tools. But just saying, ‘Stop it! You know, you’re being a jerk!’--walk away, get away from this person can make a huge amount of difference.”<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"> <strong><span style="color: #cc0000; font-size: large;">Sandra Fluke "S-<span style="color: yellow;">evil</span>-ius" ACTIVIST advocate!</span></strong></div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnHUHNmnQAJTFBgv8dh6T51WlndYrDBtH7FGrbMN9QFDMSuTq94ZbWs-f6UfBsfmfXVQHeXAg1mgoeEtZR_SV-LVdubLVkRLU5uJwXautNJsdSMErlzdapvHJtXTH7Y8utzOV8CDbh2Y8/s1600/sandra+fluke.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; cssfloat: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img aea="true" border="0" height="211px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnHUHNmnQAJTFBgv8dh6T51WlndYrDBtH7FGrbMN9QFDMSuTq94ZbWs-f6UfBsfmfXVQHeXAg1mgoeEtZR_SV-LVdubLVkRLU5uJwXautNJsdSMErlzdapvHJtXTH7Y8utzOV8CDbh2Y8/s320/sandra+fluke.jpg" width="320px" /></a>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-23446148493584577972012-03-11T19:03:00.003-07:002012-03-11T19:20:56.535-07:00POPPERS OR SEX PRODUCED LOWER BODY STINK?<strong>This is an undocumented supposed incident that happened in Harvard.</strong><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9hoPLY7nRTJHxdLUQWKIIEid77n4yxcu8qxYW3FHgpClaV57a9xWN-1udlKPZ8kgIlUkf61HLrXhVLZb0cuMCGIfiK1VjKt29YJn0Fo2IF3zA0e-EWTXo3Bb5w4Ps7KjoNzaCRdART3I/s1600/obama1996.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9hoPLY7nRTJHxdLUQWKIIEid77n4yxcu8qxYW3FHgpClaV57a9xWN-1udlKPZ8kgIlUkf61HLrXhVLZb0cuMCGIfiK1VjKt29YJn0Fo2IF3zA0e-EWTXo3Bb5w4Ps7KjoNzaCRdART3I/s1600/obama1996.jpg" yda="true" /></a></div><br />
During Barack Obama’s ALLEGED tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN.The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.<br />
<br />
In a series of comments over the past 10 days, Obama and his administration repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations of sexual harassment at the journal. They have also declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming that there were financial settlements in two cases in which men leveled complaints.<br />
<br />
THE KANSAS CITIAN has confirmed the identities of the two male journal editors who complained about Obama but, for privacy concerns, is not publishing their names.<br />
<br />
White House spokesman Jay Carney reportedly told THE KANSAS CITIAN the president indicated to White House staff that he was “vaguely familiar” with the charges and that the university’s general counsel had resolved the matter.<br />
<br />
Obama was allegedly president of the Harvard Law Review from late-1988 to mid-1989. THE KANSAS CITIAN learned of the allegations against him, and over the course of several weeks, has put together accounts of what happened by talking to a lengthy roster of former university officials, current and past students and others familiar with the workings of the journal at the time Obama was there.<br />
<br />
In one case, THE KANSAS CITIAN has seen documentation describing the allegations and showing that the university formally resolved the matter. <strong><em><u>Both men received separation packages that were in the five-figure range.</u></em></strong><br />
<br />
On the details of Obama’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two men, THE KANSAS CITIAN <strong><em><u>has a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints</u></em></strong>.<br />
<br />
The sources — including the recollections of close associates and other documentation — describe episodes that left the men upset and offended. These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature, taking place at hotels during conferences, at other officially sanctioned journal events and at the journal’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made men who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.<br />
<br />
UPDATE: Third man comes forward to AP.<br />
<br />
The AP:<br />
<br />
A third former editor says he considered filing a workplace complaint over what he considered aggressive and unwanted behavior by Barack Obama when he worked under the president in the 1991 at the University of Chicago. He says the behavior included a private invitation to his apartment.<br />
<br />
He worked for the University of Chicago when he was a Visiting Law and Government Fellow. He told The Associated Press that Obama made sexually suggestive remarks or gestures about the same time that the two editors of the Harvard Law Review had settled separate harassment complaints against him. The employee described situations in which he said <strong><em><u><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">Obama told him he had confided to colleagues how attractive he was and invited him to his apartment outside work. He spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he feared retaliation. The White House declined to comment.</span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
Related articles<br />
•Men Accuse Obama Of Sexually Inappropriate Behavior While At Harvard Law Review <span style="color: cyan;">thedaleygator.wordpress.com</span> )<br />
•Barack Obama accused by two men of inappropriate behavior ( <span style="color: cyan;">theboldcorsicanflame.wordpress.com</span> )<br />
•Barack Obama Accused By Two Men Of Inappropriate Behavior ( <span style="color: cyan;">zionistoutrage.com</span> )<br />
•Barack Obama accused by two men of inappropriate behavior ( <span style="color: cyan;">gunnyg.wordpress.com</span> )<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;">The Ulsterman Report: Sex and Murder in The Land of Obama?</span></strong><br />
<br />
And as I stood there not quite sure what to do the smell seemed to go from sweet to kind of gross like rotting garbage. It was weird.<br />
<br />
I started to try and sneak past the open door so whoever was in there couldn’t hear me but I sure could hear them and that was when I realized the sounds coming out of that conference room were sexual. I heard a male voice saying “Yeah,” again and again and then another sound from another male voice. I realized then that there were at least two men in that room having sex with themselves or someone else I could not hear. I was almost past the door when I heard a loud sniffing noise, and more of that weird smell coming from the room, and then one of the men yelled out the F-word.<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: cyan; font-size: large;"><span style="color: yellow;">Read more including about tthe murder:</span> </span></strong><br />
<a href="http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/the-ulsterman-report-sex-and-murder-in-the-land-of-obama/#ixzz1orcotRcH"><strong><span style="color: cyan; font-size: large;">http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/the-ulsterman-report-sex-and-murder-in-the-land-of-obama/#ixzz1orcotRcH</span></strong></a>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-53695064082102838862012-02-28T17:36:00.001-08:002012-02-28T17:41:54.891-08:00(HUMOR) SOME OF OUR COUNTRY LEADERSHIP IN PICTURES (HUMOR)<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjULaG-JHrzZLDTRa7JcDfNcPKeQHC9Kx4meI_MOVwmExIZjJs0XpkYWkt5RcB-5XyNv4O4qbVAqXN-8Q1FpHfeKAfG8upnUUdyZIKuVyTV9sqM8_Wn85XdCYUbUE6akWU9y5s-Gvx929w/s1600/American+dream.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjULaG-JHrzZLDTRa7JcDfNcPKeQHC9Kx4meI_MOVwmExIZjJs0XpkYWkt5RcB-5XyNv4O4qbVAqXN-8Q1FpHfeKAfG8upnUUdyZIKuVyTV9sqM8_Wn85XdCYUbUE6akWU9y5s-Gvx929w/s400/American+dream.png" uda="true" width="347px" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">THE END OF MY PHONY MESSIAH ACT!</span></strong><br />
<br />
========================================<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="font-size: large;">NO WORRIES! I WILL HAVE MORE TIME TO....</span></strong><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2giWHbzZFWS5hKQh3QguUwhqj78cDaMnM7tf8tNJuZwTW5XBAfi8MzrKv0A4slzpUbX3fVYnj8YUPsbE9JuMjundzI6EW_cYd3g6GWNRtwGMltcwzNSLoN_F81B_ROnZ8vqiQJWOh65w/s1600/boo;everywhere.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="286px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2giWHbzZFWS5hKQh3QguUwhqj78cDaMnM7tf8tNJuZwTW5XBAfi8MzrKv0A4slzpUbX3fVYnj8YUPsbE9JuMjundzI6EW_cYd3g6GWNRtwGMltcwzNSLoN_F81B_ROnZ8vqiQJWOh65w/s400/boo;everywhere.png" uda="true" width="400px" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZdTh3hiyN_yP9rQ8cpTMAoRlwbmQ1SSt3HpTudByOHSWwvPLWRs6V1Zwi-9ka37Eh7bic82I2tk4wFV2hF6_sc6fyNOrNtDYsFf0g1RPQR2PskwNDG9Ut1g-v-alEyZrD0DAOoMNPTrY/s1600/Daddy's+money.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="286px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZdTh3hiyN_yP9rQ8cpTMAoRlwbmQ1SSt3HpTudByOHSWwvPLWRs6V1Zwi-9ka37Eh7bic82I2tk4wFV2hF6_sc6fyNOrNtDYsFf0g1RPQR2PskwNDG9Ut1g-v-alEyZrD0DAOoMNPTrY/s400/Daddy's+money.jpg" uda="true" width="400px" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: x-large;">LOOK AT ME LEADING THE WORLD!!</span></strong><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmvYQzwlbvpj0Yub0YKoDMkLce_t2QNcfC0cYHP0ksDPUTL0c9R0XE-ZL5XKTfKWke_OeNlzG9LR305y7Kh0QW1FCyVCjuRCSeMeF5yfdQWDw1cz8zVu-Yivg_76KBFyNJxFjw_JryHoU/s1600/Obama_is_Ahmadinejad'sBITCHImage4.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="378px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmvYQzwlbvpj0Yub0YKoDMkLce_t2QNcfC0cYHP0ksDPUTL0c9R0XE-ZL5XKTfKWke_OeNlzG9LR305y7Kh0QW1FCyVCjuRCSeMeF5yfdQWDw1cz8zVu-Yivg_76KBFyNJxFjw_JryHoU/s400/Obama_is_Ahmadinejad'sBITCHImage4.jpg" uda="true" width="400px" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: yellow;">Iran's President Ahmadi-Nejad</span></strong></td></tr>
</tbody></table> <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
================================================<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: cyan; font-size: large;">THE ONLY TIME YOU WILL SEE A MOSLEM KISS A PIG!</span></strong><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJmj3A-6InahFmQmKRinx5LIPY9RHHmixs2pEEVqT26f881oIYF4D6LFW2ObAwK03YiPjbvj9eRL2oA_fywpKutDCu1SZlae47PuVD-cn_bh_wfEDdmeuhYrPBIEelgp-Aree7LYDLRHM/s1600/mos+kiss+pig.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="272px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJmj3A-6InahFmQmKRinx5LIPY9RHHmixs2pEEVqT26f881oIYF4D6LFW2ObAwK03YiPjbvj9eRL2oA_fywpKutDCu1SZlae47PuVD-cn_bh_wfEDdmeuhYrPBIEelgp-Aree7LYDLRHM/s400/mos+kiss+pig.png" uda="true" width="400px" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red; font-size: large;">AND MISS PIGGY IS JEALOUS AND WANTS HER KISS!</span></strong><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEijqzPzQKNJ_CZ5w9Dehg8N7y9Tf7VDBs-swCEj2SqwSS5I9JFBij9i_U8wxeLOGVoCDHthC0C8dRPfnQCJJ1puq9MnfILEA90Cs5FWnYAyOUytrWba_1CZXaV_AybMR_7bR01yx5tFkHI/s1600/miss+piggy.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEijqzPzQKNJ_CZ5w9Dehg8N7y9Tf7VDBs-swCEj2SqwSS5I9JFBij9i_U8wxeLOGVoCDHthC0C8dRPfnQCJJ1puq9MnfILEA90Cs5FWnYAyOUytrWba_1CZXaV_AybMR_7bR01yx5tFkHI/s640/miss+piggy.png" uda="true" width="395px" /></a></div>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-48438456322681801082012-02-13T14:04:00.000-08:002012-02-13T14:04:40.235-08:00VIOLIN - STRINGS OF THE HEART<strong><span style="color: yellow;">Hat Tip to FR's rdb3 "the mouth is the exhaust pipe of the heart"</span></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: cyan;">Alan Note: Over the decades I have had a classical music station on my car radio "speed dial" though my CD player also provides an ecclectic variety of music.</span></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: cyan;">At one time in life, a girlfriend would turn to another station if a violin (her villain) began a solo, though usually politely ask me to do so, since she said the instrument made her grit her teeth, no matter if it were a sweet tone or rapid "flight of the bumblebee" movement.</span></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: cyan;">I never quite understood till I listened to these violin tunes. While they jarred my nerves they are clear and worth sharing and perhaps echo my mood rather than being "lethal" as rdb3 indicates! (Smile).</span></strong><br />
<br />
===================================================<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;">25 years ago, we had <em><u>Ronald Reagan</u></em>, <em><u>Johnny Cash</u></em>, and <em><u>Bob Hope.</u></em></span></strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"><br />
</span><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;">Today we have<em><u> Obama</u></em>, <u>no cash,</u> and <u>no hope!</u></span></strong><br />
<br />
If you can't appreciate the pure beauty of the violin after hearing this, something's wrong with your ears.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://aimini.net/view/?fid=ajK0X0veB6xWd8tiTXh3"><strong><span style="color: lime;">http://aimini.net/view/?fid=ajK0X0veB6xWd8tiTXh3</span></strong></a><br />
<br />
<br />
Or you can get raw with these strings. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.aimini.net/view/?fid=EYuOurf9TXcXihh6GHpw"><strong><span style="color: lime;">http://www.aimini.net/view/?fid=EYuOurf9TXcXihh6GHpw</span></strong></a><br />
<br />
How about this gamechanger from America's Got Talent (which they SHOULD have won).<br />
<br />
<a href="http://view.aimini.com/?fid=h3AnkzvVa1N3DnycQIDU"><strong><span style="color: lime;">http://view.aimini.com/?fid=h3AnkzvVa1N3DnycQIDU</span></strong></a><br />
<br />
And finally, this, dedicated to the one and only rdb2, whose eyes are growing dim.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLgfj6YrTTY"><strong><span style="color: lime;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLgfj6YrTTY</span></strong></a><br />
<br />
Either way, the violin is sweet yet LETHAL.<br />
<br />
Do it!Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-60954418158151340742012-02-02T21:38:00.000-08:002012-02-02T21:38:26.812-08:00THE DOMINOS LINE UP FOR THE FALLAn administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obama’s name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.<br />
<br />
But win, lose or draw, the fight isn’t going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obama’s own adopted political network in Illinois.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqzaxoWsdDr6-bk70wlzffSC9d_2g-jEhcUPh29ywMjSyzgFXeskVZtba4rcr563mE3nxEY9xKUzitEEpq4Jvz8pQ01jOnmq2330g4Ot0IxpV7eyJzNVfNK09aDRE3bd7Ifw5FV8SVAKs/s1600/obama-worried.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="263px" sda="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqzaxoWsdDr6-bk70wlzffSC9d_2g-jEhcUPh29ywMjSyzgFXeskVZtba4rcr563mE3nxEY9xKUzitEEpq4Jvz8pQ01jOnmq2330g4Ot0IxpV7eyJzNVfNK09aDRE3bd7Ifw5FV8SVAKs/s400/obama-worried.jpg" width="400px" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: yellow;">WORRIED AND SHOWING IT</span></strong></div><br />
<br />
The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.<br />
<br />
A default presumably would have meant a recommendation from the judge that Obama’s name be stricken from the ballot, a decision which would head for review immediately by Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp.<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">He, however, was the one who warned Obama of the “peril” of not participating in the hearing when Obama and his attorney had asked that the event be canceled.</span></strong><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: cyan;">Discover what the Constitution’s reference to “natural born citizen” means and whether Barack Obama qualifies, in the ebook version of “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?”</span></strong><br />
<br />
Whatever the outcome in Georgia, the issue is gaining traction in other states, too, including <strong><span style="font-size: large;">Alabama, Tennessee, Arizona, New Hampshire, and even </span><span style="color: red;"><span style="font-size: large;">Illinois, Obama’s home political base</span>.</span></strong><br />
<br />
There, in a complaint recently filed by Stephen F. Boulton of McCarthy Duffy LLP and Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, their client is asking for a change in state law to allow the vetting of political candidates.<br />
<br />
Obama isn’t even mentioned by name, but don’t think for a minute that the requested change wouldn’t include his candidacy.<br />
<br />
The plaintiff is <strong><span style="color: cyan;">Sharon Meroni</span></strong>, who long has fought inside the system for a way to challenge the candidacies there. In her new case, filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, she is petitioning for a judicial review of the state’s election procedures as they exist now.<br />
<br />
Targeted are the state Board of Elections, members of the board, several county clerks and others, including candidates Dan Duffy and Amanda Howland.<br />
<br />
Meroni, a registered voter in the 27th Legislative District in the state, said her concern is that “only candidates qualified for office under the Illinois and United States Constitutions appear on the ballot.”<br />
<br />
The state’s primary is in March.<br />
<br />
The case alleges the candidates did not provide sufficient proof that they are U.S. citizens as required to hold the office being sought “as is required by the Illinois Constitution of 1970.”<br />
<br />
State officials refused to remove the names from the ballots, so Meroni has gone to court. Granting ballot access, she said in the complaint, <strong><span style="color: red;">“is contrary to law, against the manifest weight of the evidence, arbitrary and capricious, and a denial of the rights of the petitioner.”</span></strong><br />
<br />
Kreep told WND the way the system is established in Illinois it essentially allows political parties to determine who runs for office, and unless voters find out about a filing and can assemble a formal objection within five days, their concerns are dismissed.<br />
<br />
And the system has no procedure for verifying the eligibility of candidates, he said.<br />
<br />
That particular issue has been in the headlines for the past four years, since before Obama’s 2008 election victory, because of the questions that remain over his eligibility. The U.S. Constitution demands a “natural born citizen” be president and the Founders probably thought that to be the offspring of two citizen parents when they wrote the term.<br />
<br />
But Obama’s father never was a citizen. There also are those who contend the junior Obama was not even born in the United States.<br />
<br />
Kreep said the Illinois procedures make it virtually impossible for candidates to be challenged for their eligibility.<br />
<br />
He said there likely will be raised in other states concerns similar to those in Illinois, where “barriers now in existence … bar voters from reasonable investigation of the citizenship of a candidate.”<br />
<br />
That’s simply a deprivation of the constitutional right to due process, he said. The case seeks a declaration that the political maneuvers are unconstitutional.<br />
<br />
There also have been assembled campaigns specifically to encourage voters to file eligibility complaints about candidates with states. One such effort is the Obama Ballot Challenge, which lists contacts for state elections offices across the country.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;"><strong>It is, of course, the states that actually run elections; a national election is just the compilation of the results from the 50 states.</strong></span><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: red;">“A candidate that is <span style="background-color: yellow;">not</span> legally qualified to be on the ballot, such as Barack Obama, steals votes from other candidates who are legally on the ballot,”</span></strong> the site advises.<br />
<br />
WND previously reported that cases already have been begun in New Hampshire, where state officials rejected the claims; Alabama, Tennessee and Arizona.<br />
<br />
The newest round of court actions do not try to have a judge determine Obama is not qualified for the Oval Office and remove him from it, they simply challenge his eligibility for the 2012 election.<br />
<br />
Many of the cases cite Minor v. Happersett, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion from 1875 that said a “natural born citizen” would be a person <strong><span style="color: red;"><u>whose parents both were citizens.</u></span></strong><br />
<br />
“This complaint does not request any injunction against any state or federal government official. Instead this complaint asserts that the private entity, Defendant Democratic Party, intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the plaintiffs, to the states, and to the citizens of the United States,” said one of the filings.<br />
<br />
It continued, “Because Mr. Obama has admitted that his father was not a U.S. citizen, and because this fact has been confirmed by the U.S. State Department, any reasonable person with knowledge of these facts would doubt Mr. Obama’s constitutional qualifications. Therefore, any representation by the Democratic Party certifying said qualifications would be negligent, absent further evidence verifying Mr. Obama’s natural-born status.<br />
<br />
“Plaintiffs further request an injunction prohibiting the Democratic Party from making any representation to any state official asserting, implying, or assuming that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of president, absent a showing by the party sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent.”<br />
<br />
Van Irion, lead counsel for Liberty Legal Foundation, also is working on several of the issues, and has brought the question in court in Arizona.<br />
<br />
“We picked the Arizona court for several reasons, but the main one being that it is part of the 9th Circuit. The 9th Circuit has indicated in dicta that an FEC-registered presidential candidate would have standing for this type of suit,” he said. The organization is working with John Dummett, a Liberty Legal Foundation member who is a candidate for the office of president in the 2012 election.<br />
<br />
Irion said the other lawsuit was filed in state court in Tennessee.<br />
<br />
“The focus of the state-court suit is to prevent certification to the Tennessee Secretary of State. This suit puts greater emphasis on the negligent misrepresentation/fraud aspects of a certification from the DNC. It includes more facts regarding Obama’s Indonesian dual citizenship and fraudulent Social Security Number,” he said.<br />
<br />
He said if the cases succeed, the Democrats would not be able to list Obama as their candidate for 2012.<br />
<br />
“Neither lawsuit discusses Obama’s place of birth or his birth certificate. These issues are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF’s lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined ‘natural-born citizen’ as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant,” Van Irion’s group said.<br />
<br />
WND also has reported that Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a formal law enforcement investigation into concerns Obama may submit fraudulent documentation to be put on the state’s election ballot in 2012.<br />
<br />
Other attorneys involved in the Georgia case are J. Mark Hatfield and Orly Taitz.<br />
<br />
Hatfield has told WND that the goal is for a court determination on the definition of “natural born citizen,” which then could be applied directly to Obama’s candidacy.Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-2782392238242161462012-01-09T16:40:00.000-08:002012-01-09T16:53:59.396-08:00TERRORISM BY GOVERNMENT THUGGERY - courtesy of OBAMA<strong><span style="font-size: large;">Note: Currently the EPA decisions CANNOT be taken/appealed to court by the accused-defendant. Right now this small landowner who wants to <span style="color: yellow;">build a small house</span> is facing <span style="color: red;">$100 MILLION in EPA fines</span>!!!!</span></strong><br />
<br />
<span style="color: yellow;">by Lyle Denniston Reporter</span><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="color: yellow;">January 9th, 2012</span> <br />
<br />
<br />
A weak defense of EPA (UPDATED)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Analysis<br />
<br />
With a federal government lawyer conceding almost every criticism leveled at the way the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency compels landowners to avoid polluting the nation’s waterways, the Supreme Court on Monday seemed well on its way toward finding some way to <strong><em><u>curb that agency’s enforcement powers</u></em></strong>. Their task was made easier as Deputy U.S. Solicitor General Malcolm L. Stewart stopped just short of saying that EPA was just as heavy-handed as its adversaries — and several of the Justices — were saying.<br />
<br />
Perhaps the most telling example: when several of the Justices expressed alarm that a homeowner targeted by EPA’s efforts might face a penalty of as much as $37,500 each day of alleged violation, Stewart made it clear that the fine actually might be doubled, to $75,000 a day, although he tried to recover by saying that was only “theoretical,” and that he <strong><u><span style="color: red;">did not think</span></u></strong> that EPA had ever taken that step.<br />
<br />
<br />
The argument in Sackett, et al., v. EPA (docket 10-1062) did not appear to portend a slam-dunk loss for EPA during the first half of Monday’s argument, when the lawyer for an Idaho couple faced quite rigorous questioning about whether the couple had exercised options that might have been open to them to avert the dire consequences of EPA enforcement. <br />
<br />
But the tenor of the session changed abruptly as soon as the line of argument chosen by EPA’s lawyer, Stewart, unfolded.<br />
<br />
It all came to something of an explosive verbal climax when Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., suggested that the scheme that Stewart had outlined would be considered by the ordinary homeowner as something that “can’t happen in the United States.” <br />
<br />
Alito ticked off the situation: the homeowner planned to build a house on a lot, the lot was found to have “a little drainage problem,” the homeowner was soon told by EPA that “you have wetlands,” that steps had to be taken to alleviate the environmental threat, that “you have to let us on your premises,” that every day “you face $75,000 in penalties,” that the <strong><em><u><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">homeowner cannot go to court to make a challenge,</span></u></em></strong> and that, <strong><em><u><span style="color: red;">if there is a court case, it won’t occur “until we choose.” </span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><em><u><span style="color: cyan;">(UNBELIEVABLE: Justice delayed is justice denied!!!)</span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><em><u><span style="color: red;">(Alan note: Obama proving his Terrorism against America is not just with bombs and bullets!)</span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
Stewart did not dispute the recitation even in that accusatory fashion, and could only answer that such an order from EPA would not have been “the first communication” from EPA to the homeowner, since the agency would try earlier to alert property owners of <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">their obligations under the law.</span></strong><br />
<br />
The argument that a homeowner — or a business firm, for that matter — <u><em><strong>could face a double penalty</strong></em></u> was raised early in the argument Monday by Damien M. Schiff, a lawyer for Chantell and Michael Sackett, the Priest Lake, Idaho, couple that has been fighting with EPA for four years over their plans to <strong><em><u><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">build a home on a lot they own</span></u></em></strong> — a lot that EPA says has wetlands on it. Schiff, continuing his legal team’s emphasis upon the personal plight of a couple supposedly of modest means, said the couple could be fined the maximum — $37,500 per day if they were found to violate federal environmental law itself, and a separate $37,500 <strong><em><u><span style="color: red;">if they took actions that violate EPA’s compliance order against them*</span></u></em></strong>. Schiff said that EPA had conceded that in its brief in the case.<br />
<br />
<strong><em><u><span style="color: yellow;">(Alan note: in other words don't you DARE complain of we'll get you! Obama Chicago style policy and governance!)</span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
It appeared to come, however, as a surprise to the Justices. And, at one point, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., intimated that Schiff was exaggerating the threat to his clients, since, Roberts said, the fine <strong><em><u>might</u></em></strong> actually be only $10 a day, not the maximum.<br />
<br />
But when Schiff, in answer to the Chief Justice, sought to make a separate challenge to other obligations under the compliance order, even without fines, Scalia suggested that he stay on the fines. “So, you know, sufficient unto the day the evil thereof. We don’t have to consider more difficult cases.”<br />
<br />
Indeed, as Schiff’s argument unfolded, he did not appear to be generating much sympathy for clients like his, since much of the argument was a detailed exploration of what processes they might have available to challenge EPA, and the prospect — <strong><span style="background-color: yellow;"><span style="color: red;">described by some Justices as rather dim</span> </span></strong>— that they <strong><em><u>could defeat</u></em></strong> EPA <strong><em><u>even if they did have court review of their challenge.</u></em></strong> <br />
<br />
Indeed, as the Sacketts’ lawyer prepared to take his seat, the character of the case had moved well away from his preferred David vs. Goliath contest, into a somewhat dull exploration of administrative law, even though Schiff now and then would bring up again the $37,500 figure and the threat of “ruinous” financial penalty.<br />
<br />
Apparently, however, Schiff had gotten the attention of the Justices on the <u><em><strong><span style="color: yellow;">issue of the double penalty,</span></strong></em></u> and that prompted Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart, as he began his response, to concede the possibility of double penalties. He said it had been put in the EPA brief “as an exercise of our duty of candor to the Court.” <br />
<br />
He said it was “theoretical,” not “practical.” When Justice Stephen G. Breyer noted that the compliance order issued to the Sacketts had mentioned only $37,500, not double that, Stewart said that was all that the order needed to say.<br />
<br />
Soon, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., said he was confused, asking whether there were double penalties? Stewart said it was a legal possibility, but he knew of no case in which it had been done. <br />
<br />
The Justices, though, were now fully engaged on the double penalties, and other members of the Court pressed Stewart on it. Justice Alito, for example, got an admission from Stewart that the government had not adopted a policy to rule it out. “So,” said Alito, “‘it’s more than theoretical.” <br />
<br />
And when the government lawyer continued to say double fining had not been done, Justice Scalia remarked sarcastically, “I’m not going to bet my house on that.”<br />
<br />
When Stewart tried to defend himself by saying that the Sacketts had not even been aware of the double penalty prospect before reading the government’s brief, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy offered his own sarcastic thrust: “They were getting a good night’s sleep before they read your brief?” The audience laughed.<br />
<br />
What had clearly happened, in the opening moments of Stewart’s argument, was that the threatened plight of the Sacketts had come fully into prominence again, and the government was exactly where Schiff had sought to put it: on the defensive. Stewart might have wished that he had chosen another way to open his side of the argument.<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: cyan;">But the circumstances actually deteriorated further for EPA and its lawyer</span></strong>. <br />
<br />
As Stewart answered other questions about how EPA’s compliance orders actually work, his responses sometimes simply produced more sarcasm. Scalia, for example, said <strong><em><span style="color: cyan;"><u>“Well, that’s very nice” when Stewart said the Sacketts had been advised that they could tell EPA if they thought some of its demands were “infeasible.” </u></span></em></strong><br />
<br />
Scalia continued: “That’s very nice, when you have received something called a compliance order, which says you are subject to penalties of 32.5 for every day of violations.” ($32,500 was the former maximum penalty per day; it is now $37,500, as other comments during the argument made clear.)<br />
<br />
Scalia warmed to the subject, suggesting flatly that the agency had been <strong><span style="color: yellow;">“high-handed,” demanding things of the Sacketts that simply were <em><u>not required by the law.</u></em></span></strong><br />
<br />
It was Justice Alito, though, who completed Stewart’s embarrassment, with the devastating query that began this way: “Mr. Stewart, if you related the facts of this case as they come to us to an ordinary homeowner, don’t you think most ordinary homeowners would say this kind of thing <strong><em><u><span style="color: yellow;">can’t happen in the United States?”</span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><em><u><span style="color: yellow;">(Alan note: unless it is the Obamination of the USA)</span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
A good deal of time remained in the argument, but it seemed virtually over at that point. Schiff was obviously pleased; when his time for rebuttal came up, he offered to waive it if the Court had no more questions. There were a few, but there was nothing in them to bail out the EPA’s compliance order.Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-35650505662168449982011-12-14T21:43:00.000-08:002011-12-14T21:49:10.899-08:00IS THERE NO END TO OBAMA 'S PLANNED THEFTS & CORRUPTION?<strong><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">WHILE OBAMA CARRIES OUT THESE THEFTS THROUGH OTHER PEOPLE HE IS A CO-CONSPIRATOR AND HELPING THESE "ASSISANTS" HE PROTECTS ROB THE USA BLIND! </span></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">Can anyone still have doubts that re-electing him is saying bye, bye to America? Read all about it!</span></strong><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6Q4P8O_jsqqCwBc1iTlnyEI_GUbWas4Ob3rffVaVbx-m_xJArnBZ6auJniXt5RDKGm6wDVM0L78w37K5K36L_hIyw5DN2gcfjW4MB0vU6whT7rAoO4wOYEyCENgw_1h9Q2soCIaILY-k/s1600/glauthier.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400px" oda="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6Q4P8O_jsqqCwBc1iTlnyEI_GUbWas4Ob3rffVaVbx-m_xJArnBZ6auJniXt5RDKGm6wDVM0L78w37K5K36L_hIyw5DN2gcfjW4MB0vU6whT7rAoO4wOYEyCENgw_1h9Q2soCIaILY-k/s400/glauthier.jpg" width="313px" /></a></div><br />
<br />
TJ Glauthier <br />
<br />
An adviser to Barack Obama who played a key role in developing the energy provisions of the so-called stimulus bill has served on the boards of several companies <strong><em><u>that recently received government funds, including hundreds of millions in "stimulus" money. </u></em></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><u><span style="color: red;">TJ Glauthier served on Obama's 2008 White House Transition Team. He is widely credited with helping to craft the energy provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the "stimulus." </span></u></strong><br />
<br />
In addition to serving on the boards of major energy companies, Glauthier previously <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">held two presidential appointments during the Clinton administration. </span></strong><br />
<br />
He was the <strong><span style="color: red;">Energy Department's</span></strong> deputy secretary and chief operating officer, <strong><em><u>the second-highest ranking official. </u></em></strong><br />
<br />
Earlier, he served in the White House for five years as the associate director for natural resources, energy and science in the Office of Management and Budget. <br />
<br />
Everything you wanted to know about Obama's advisers, in "Red Army: The Radical Network that must be defeated to save America." <br />
<br />
<strong><em><u>Glauthier is tied to several energy companies that benefited from the "stimulus" bill he helped to craft. </u></em></strong><br />
<br />
One such company investigated by WND is GridPoint Inc., where he was appointed to the board in March 2008. GridPoint provides utilities with software solutions for electrical grid management and electric power demand and supply balancing. <br />
<br />
The "stimulus" provides <strong><u><span style="color: red;">$4.5 billion</span></u></strong> for so-called smart grid projects. <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">GridPoint</span></strong> has benefited from scores of smart grid deals funded by the "stimulus" bill. <br />
<br />
The company partnered with the Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation (eTec), Nissan, the Idaho National Laboratory and others in a project to deploy electric vehicles (EVs) and their charging infrastructure in five states. The Energy Department had awarded eTec almost <strong><span style="color: red;">$100 million</span></strong> in "stimulus" funds to support the project. <br />
<br />
GridPoint's role in the eTec project was to supply smart charging and data logging capability to utilities located in strategic markets of eTec's program in Arizona, California, Oregon, Tennessee and Washington. <br />
<br />
GridPoint also benefited from "stimulus" funds when it recently provided home energy management, load management and electric vehicle management software solutions for a KCP&L's Green Impact Zone SmartGrid Demonstration in Kansas City, Mo. The project was the recipient of stimulus funding. <br />
<br />
Additionally, GridPoint helped the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, or SMUD, manage power from its customers' rooftop solar panels. <br />
<br />
The Arlington, Va.-based company had landed a contract to help the Sacramento, Calif.-based municipal utility manage renewable power integration, energy storage and home energy management systems. <strong><span style="color: red;">SMUD had won $127.5 million</span></strong> in stimulus funds from the Department of Energy to carry out the project, which also includes deploying 600,000 smart meters in its service territory. <br />
<br />
Also, in early 2009, the Energy Department awarded <strong><span style="color: red;">Argonne National Laboratory</span></strong> nearly <strong><u><span style="color: red;">$2.7 million in stimulus</span></u></strong> funding for three solar-energy related research projects. In addition, Argonne reportedly shared another <strong><span style="color: red;">$5 million</span></strong> in stimulus funding for projects with <strong><em><u>GridPoint</u></em></strong> and other companies and the University of Illinois Sustainable Technology Center. <br />
<br />
Besides benefiting from stimulus grants, GridPoint last year won a <strong><span style="color: red;">$28 million contract</span></strong> with the United States Postal Service to install energy management systems in selected post office locations across the U.S. <br />
<br />
Glauthier, meanwhile, also had come under fire after Fox News reported the <strong><em><u><span style="color: red;">U.S. Navy has purchased 450,000 gallons of biofuel for about $16 a gallon, or about four times the price of its standard marine fuel, JP-5, which has been going for under $4 a gallon. </span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
And HotAir reported last week that Glauthier is a <strong><span style="color: red;">"strategic adviser" to Solazyme</span></strong>, the California company that is <strong><em><u>selling a portion of the biofuel to the Navy. </u></em></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<em><u></u></em></strong><br />
HotAir noted Solazyme received a <strong><span style="color: red;">$21.8 million grant</span></strong> from the 2009 stimulus package. <br />
<br />
Also, writing at BigGovernment two weeks ago, Whitney Pitcher found that prior to serving as adviser to Solazyme and after his time as part of Obama's transition team, Glauthier served on the advisory board of SunRun, a solar financing company. <br />
<br />
In October of 2010, just a few short months after Glauthier joined <strong><u><span style="color: red;">SunRun's advisory board</span></u></strong>, SunRun secured a <strong><em><span style="color: red;">$6.73 million grant</span></em></strong> from a Treasury Department stimulus program. The company was the ninth largest recipient of such programs through December 2010. <br />
<br />
With research by Brenda J. Elliott <br />
Read more: Outrage! Author of 'stimulus' linked to companies it helped <a href="http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=377465#ixzz1gZpMjwBH"><span style="color: cyan;">http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=377465#ixzz1gZpMjwBH</span></a>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-25804537483138332482011-11-14T11:28:00.000-08:002011-11-23T15:36:30.485-08:00SUPREME COURT WILL HOPEFULLY FIND ANSWERS TO THESE<strong><span style="color: yellow;">Next Spring, probably around March 2012, the Supreme Court of the USA (SCOTUS) will hear the case brought by some 26 States about the Constitutionality of ObamaCare.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">Usually allowing ONE hour for arguments the Court will allow FIVE and a half hours for the ObamaCare hearings!</span></strong><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><strong><span style="color: red;">AND it appears virtually certain that</span></strong> <strong><em><u><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">the eligibility of Obama himself to be in the Oval office will be part of the pleadings!</span></u></em></strong></span><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">Happening in the middle of Obama's campaign for re-election, matters should be historic and divulge many of his secrets. His only hopes are the two judges he appointed to the Supreme Court, one of whom worked on his behalf in other procedings before being elevated.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">She may have to recuse herself, thus even the playing field.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">=====================================</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">President 0bama, will you finally come clean on your hidden records? You know, transparency and all. We want to know Why these questions are off limits?</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">1. The Original Birth Certificate - Yes, the absolute original, examined and certified by three independent forensic experts.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">2. Please produce your Columbia University transcripts.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">3. Please, your original Columbia thesis paper.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">4. Please produce your Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">5. Please produce your Harvard University transcripts.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">6. Please produce your Illinois State Senate records including your voting record.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">7. Please produce your Illinois State Senate schedule.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">8. Please produce your Law practice client list and billing records/summary.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">9. Please produce the locations and names of all half-siblings and stepmother.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">10. Your complete Medical Records (we've only seen the one page summary released so far). Have you had drug tests done? Are you still using coke? Please, your liver function tests to clarify alcohol abuse. Have you had an AIDS test?</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">11. Please produce your Occidental College Transcripts. Also, any records of student aid received and under what names(s) and nationality.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">11. Please show us your Parent’s original Marriage Certificate.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">13. Please produce your record of Baptism.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">14. Please produce your Selective Service registration records (Did you actually Register for Selective Service?) Also, why does your SS not pass e-verify?</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">15. Please provide us with schedules for all trips outside of the United States before 2007.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">16. Please produce all Passport records for all passports, US and otherwise - before the scrubbing.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">17. Can you show us a list of your scholarly articles?</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">18. Your SAT and LSAT test scores please. Did you even take the SAT and LSAT?</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">19. What's with no access to your grandmother in Kenya?</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">20. Please list of all campaign workers that currently are lobbyists.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">21. Please produce Punahou grade school records.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">22. Why are Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education?</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">23. Please produce page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham's divorce decree.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">24. Why did you, President Barack Obama, resign from the Illinois bar and where are all of the relevant documents?</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">25. Why did Michelle Obama resign from the Illinois bar after only about four years of practice and where are all of the relevant documents?</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">Why are these records hidden? Who are you President Obama? Will these records be revealed before November 6, 2012? We the People care about our country deeply and are very concerned about a POTUS who has hidden every scrap of information about his life.</span></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">The voting public deserves to know these answers. We have many more questions, but please answer these first to show your transparency and good faith. We'll keep passing this list on until we get some answers.</span></strong>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-65524982176645098502011-10-22T19:00:00.000-07:002011-10-22T19:00:07.967-07:00REPUBLICANS SUCCUMB TO POLITICAL BLACKMAIL?by Lawrence Sellin (Oct. 22, 2011) <br />
The Republican Party was founded in 1854 on an anti-slavery platform and came to dominate the northern region of the country by 1858<br />
<br />
I have received information from multiple sources that Congressional Republicans are fully aware that Barack Hussein <strong><u><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">Obama is a Constitutionally illegal President and has committed felonies both before and after occupying the Oval Office.</span></u></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="font-size: large;">Specifically, Obama is not a natural born citizen and, therefore, has never been eligible for the office of President. In addition, Obama has forged his birth documents and Selective Service registration and uses a Social Security number not issued to him.</span></strong><br />
<br />
The Republican establishment has decided that challenging Obama on those issues will be ineffective and <strong><u><span style="color: yellow;">will cause complete havoc in the country.</span></u></strong><br />
<br />
It is clear to me that Obama and the mainstream media have been thoroughly successful using <strong><em><u>Saul Alinsky’s Rules 5 and 9 of “Rules for Radicals</u></em></strong>”:<br />
<br />
Rule 5 – “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.<br />
<br />
Rule 9 – “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”<br />
<br />
Republicans are fully intimidated by the Obama campaign and its supporters in the mainstream media with the certainty of being labeled and dismissed as “racists,” “birthers” and right-wing “conspiracy theorists” if they confront Obama regarding his violation of the Constitution and his felonies.<br />
<br />
Republicans have also been intimidated by the threat of<strong><span style="background-color: yellow;"> <span style="color: red;">civil unrest</span></span></strong> instigated by the Obama campaign and executed by union thugs, left-wing radicals and Black Nationalist extremists.<br />
<br />
In both cases, the Republicans <strong><u>have succumbed to political blackmail</u></strong>.<br />
<br />
What goes unmentioned in the Republicans’ explanation is that, because of their complicity in the cover-up of Obama’s ineligibility and crimes, they are also vulnerable to political criticism and <strong><span style="color: red;">criminal prosecution.</span></strong><br />
<br />
The Republican strategy, therefore, is to challenge Obama on policy, educate the public and defeat him in the 2012 election.<br />
<br />
Good luck with that approach, with the already anointed RINO candidate Mitt Romney and with a party platform of <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">warmed-over platitudes and promises with post-election expiration dates.</span></strong><br />
<br />
In my opinion, regardless of who wins the Presidency in 2012, Obama’s ineligibility and his crimes will never be addressed. <br />
<br />
Both the Democrats and the Republicans have too much to lose.<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">(WHAT WE THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA LOSE IN THE PROCESS APPEARS IRRELEVANT)</span></strong><br />
<br />
Exposure of the Obama fraud and criminal activity would reveal the depth of corruption in the two-party system.<br />
<br />
<strong><em><u>The extent of the deception perpetrated by Obama supporters is mindboggling.</u></em></strong><br />
<br />
For example, attorney Leo Donofrio has evidence conclusively establishing that, during the run-up to the 2008 election, 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions referencing Minor v. Happersett (1875), the case which proves that Obama is an illegal President, <strong><em><u>were sabotaged, then republished at Justia.com</u></em></strong>, the main resource on the web for all things related to United States Supreme Court holdings.<br />
<br />
<strong><u><span style="color: red;">According to that report, <span style="color: yellow;">Justia.com CEO</span> Tim Stanley was associated with </span><span style="color: yellow;">“Obama For America 2008.”</span></u></strong><br />
<br />
Instead of instruments to promote the general welfare, the Democrats and Republicans have become the <span style="color: red;"><strong><span style="background-color: yellow;">tools of an invisible government</span></strong>,</span> <strong><em><u>which owes no allegiance and acknowledges no responsibility to the American people.</u></em></strong><br />
<br />
We have been politically disenfranchised. We have the right to vote, but we have lost control of the government.<br />
<br />
James Jackson, representative from Georgia to the First U.S. Congress stated:<br />
<br />
“We must confine ourselves to the powers described in the Constitution, and the moment we pass it, we take an arbitrary stride towards a despotic Government.”<br />
<br />
Congressional Democrats and Republicans have stridden far beyond that point and now feel free to ignore our petitions and treat our beliefs with disdain.<br />
<br />
Political expediency has clouded their judgment and obscured their view of the danger our country faces.<br />
<br />
There are anti-democratic and anti-American forces working aggressively inside the country to bring down our republic. These forces are promoting the interests of nations hostile to the United States, of global financiers and radical Islam.<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">The work of these forces is facilitated by corrupt or cowardly politicians, radical leftists and by useful idiots oblivious to the fact that they are aiding and abetting American enemies, who will ultimately eradicate our freedom and way of life.</span></strong><br />
<br />
Barack Obama represents the nexus of those treacherous forces.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, Republican leaders are asking the American people to tolerate violations of the Constitution and ignore extensive criminality at the highest levels of government so their party can win the 2012 election.<br />
<br />
If the Constitution and the rule of law mean so little to either the Democrats or the Republicans, <strong><em><u><span style="color: red;">then what’s the point</span></u></em></strong>?<br />
<br />
A Republican victory in 2012 may mean the revocation of Obama’s most onerous policies, <strong><em><u><span style="color: red;">but will they ever address his ineligibility and crimes?</span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;">Having become complicit, I think not.</span></strong>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-49015359774624068842011-10-08T14:16:00.000-07:002011-10-08T14:19:27.233-07:00HIS WORK IS ALMOST DONE! RE-ELECTION WOULD FINISH IT! AND US! <table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMDxvojsopLxoSS0H6lMlpA0VQKQQYOFRCJtOFY3smKcxMxiQ0D5oVi1YXBWcPBPiNYTpv8U-QvANBGBD1AWxnDZhYBiS7oKRfsLqNaJSor47uXcEK5XisiuX89sVWnoahO_jg592XogY/s1600/work+is+done.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="282px" kca="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMDxvojsopLxoSS0H6lMlpA0VQKQQYOFRCJtOFY3smKcxMxiQ0D5oVi1YXBWcPBPiNYTpv8U-QvANBGBD1AWxnDZhYBiS7oKRfsLqNaJSor47uXcEK5XisiuX89sVWnoahO_jg592XogY/s400/work+is+done.bmp" width="400px" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: red;">ALMOST DONE - NEED RE-ELECTION TO MAXIMIZE IT</span></strong></td></tr>
</tbody></table> <br />
<strong>With all the fetid stench of slime splashed down on us by the most corrupt, radical, Chicago ganster administration in our lifetimes, humor has also taken on a new twist. The twist was always there but restrained.</strong><br />
<br />
Now more and more people are showing their protest of the “protection racket” the Dept. of INJustice is implementing in many sensitive areas, specially with pro-Islamist bias, even to the extent of breaking the law to protect Moslems and Sharia law while suppressing Christian beliefs and freedoms.<br />
<br />
Illegal gun running, or funding terrorists to buy them, refusing to charge and deport criminal even felonious illegals are just a sector. Even overriding Federal judiciary decisions to prevent States from implementing LAWS - puts them beyond <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">Organized Crime</span></strong> and <strong><em><u>they should be charged with the RICO </u></em></strong>(<strong>R</strong>acketeer <strong>I</strong>nfluenced and <strong>C</strong>riminal <strong>O</strong>rganization Act) <strong><em><u>statutes</u></em></strong>. <br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;"><strong>OVER</strong></span>-spending all <span style="color: red;"><strong>OUR</strong></span> hard earned money as if it were theirs (free money for them) and crony financing such as the last humongous loan of nearly a HALF BILLION for a green project belonging to Nancy Pelosi’s close relative is pushing Americans to the brink.<br />
<br />
Except the most <strong><em><u>naively ignorant</u></em></strong> and <strong><em><u>teat sucking free loaders</u></em></strong> gorging themselves at the public trough, while contributing little of nothing to the “wealth” being spread around <strong><u><em>to THEM</em></u></strong>. <br />
<br />
Thus want Obama there to continue their free ride while they do <strong><u>NOT</u></strong> pay <strong><u>THEIR</u></strong> fair share as he insists others should.<br />
<br />
As long as he is helping create a Caliphate of which he hopes one day to become the leader, Obama, beyond a desire to be re-elected and continue the destruction he is raining down on America and much of the world, cares nothing about the misery, pain and DEATH he is causing by his proxies like the Moslem Brotherhood he harbors <strong><u>inside</u></strong> the White House, the Islamic regime of Iran and Syrian myriad deaths of their countrymen. <br />
<br />
MOSTLY by some 20,000 Iranian Suppression forces exported to do this in Syria.<br />
<br />
The slow and painful awakening of “we the people” is still being thwarted by Obama via his Islamists, Union thugs, oppressive Dept. of Injustice and corrupt Senators, who have just removed any obstacle to riding roughshod over us with their “nuclear option” change of filibuster rules.<br />
<br />
The most urgent question appears to be whether when saner Republicans, Independents (or coming to their senses Democrats) increase their voting presence in the Senate and vote Obama out of office next year <strong><u><span style="color: red;">will there be anything left to salvage from the rubble he is leaving behind!</span></u></strong><br />
<br />
Seriously, at this rate, not much of our financial or cultural infrastructure in America will be left - nor in much of the rest of the world.<br />
<br />
Hope springs eternal but we are borderline already past the point of rescue! Many waiting for the final axe to fall or simply delaying the inevitable if Obama stays in office.<br />
<br />
Having watched this happen in Iran after Khomeini took power (via Jimmuh the ideologue idiot Carter) Obama is a <strong><u><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">replay</span></u></strong> with a vengeance in spades. For those old enough to have seen or even read how Communism or the Bolsheviks took over,<strong><em><span style="color: red;"> it’s a virtual replay of that ruthless madness, too.</span></em></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="color: red;">He has yet to have an excuse to start killing us with any impunity. </span></em></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="color: red;">DON'T be astonished if that comes to pass if he declares martial law and suspends or cancels elections. </span></em></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="color: yellow;">No! Based on his mindsets not such an overly fanciful speculation.</span></em></strong><br />
<br />
Americans have mostly been immune from facing such <strong><em><u><span style="color: cyan;">gut wrenching, lethal and devastating events and misery</span></u></em></strong> inside America so fail to recognize the multiple signs of what Obama is doing to them and the whole world.<br />
<br />
<strong><u><span style="color: red;">Which verges on immature, ideological <span style="background-color: yellow; color: black;">insanity</span> not someone who wants to improve the world.</span></u></strong>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-47590593925979838772011-09-03T10:39:00.000-07:002011-09-03T10:56:57.287-07:00FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ALLOWS FOREIGN BORN TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT 2012By Alex Knott <br />
<br />
<strong><u><span style="color: yellow;">ALAN NOTE: Eligibility is NOT decided by the FEC nor the Federal Government but by the individual States and by Congress AND there are NO legal provisions nor requirement NOR legal OBLIGATION for ANYBODY, at any level anywhere, to VERIFY a candidate's CONSTITUTIONAL eligibility.</span></u></strong><br />
<br />
<span style="color: cyan;">The Federal Election Commission (FEC) ruled Friday that a <strong><em><u>Guyana-born American citizen</u></em></strong></span> <span style="background-color: yellow;"><strong><u><span style="color: red;">could file papers and raise money</span></u></strong> to run for <strong><em><u><span style="color: red;">president</span></u></em></strong> </span><span style="background-color: yellow;"><span style="color: red;">of the United States. </span><span style="color: red;">But the agency also told the prospective candidate, </span></span><span style="background-color: yellow;"><strong><span style="color: red;">Abdul Hassan</span></strong>, <span style="color: red;">that his campaign may not receive federal matching funds because he was not born in America.</span></span><br />
<br />
The FEC’s unanimous vote allows Hassan — who was born in the South American country in 1974 — to be a candidate, solicit funds and requires him to file disclosure reports for a presidential bid. However, the agency’s decision <strong><em><u>stopped short of addressing the constitutional issue of whether someone born outside the United States can be president.</u></em></strong><br />
<br />
Instead, the agency told Hassan he may not receive any presidential primary matching funds by quoting the Constitution, stating <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">“[n]o Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.” </span></strong><br />
<br />
Hassan’s request appeared to put the FEC in the rare role of deciding a large constitutional issue that has only a few intersections with campaign finance law. The two commonly held constitutional requirements to run for president are that the candidate be 35 years of age or older and be a “natural born citizen.” <br />
<br />
But FEC commissioners said repeatedly that their decision to define Hassan as a candidate had nothing to do with his birth country. They said that current federal election law allows for someone to be a candidate, <strong><em><u>regardless of whether they can legally hold the office they seek</u></em></strong> and that the FEC is not charged with deciding presidential criteria including one’s natural-born citizenship. <br />
<br />
<strong><em><u><span style="color: cyan;">(Alan note: is this their escape tactic for avoiding responsibility for allowing Obama, whose eligibility qualification is being challenged in the courts AND NEVER VERIFIED, to run for the White House?)</span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
“This does not mean that he can go and say ‘look the FEC has said that I am a candidate, give me money, I’m official,’” said Republican Commissioner Donald McGahn. “That is not what we do here; we don’t certify you as a candidate. That’s what the states do.”<br />
<br />
During Thursday’s meeting, commissioners said they had trepidation about voting for Hassan’s candidacy because of how it might be perceived. <br />
<br />
“By saying that it is okay — it does give the impression that we don’t see a problem,” said Democratic Commissioner Steven Walther. “I think that we really need to be cognizant of how this could be misconstrued.”<br />
<br />
<strong><em><u><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">The FEC’s decision to allow Hassan to go through the initial steps to run for president took place outside of its normal publicly attended open meetings and instead was approved by a tally vote as commissioners tried to reach a consensus.</span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
One of the final sections added to approved opinion states: “Notwithstanding this conclusion, the Commission expresses no opinion on Mr. Hassan’s potential liability arising out of his proposed activities under any other Federal or State law, including any laws concerning fraudulent misrepresentation. Any such issues are outside the Commission’s jurisdiction.”<br />
<br />
“For us this is really all about what we are empowered to decide and what we are not empowered to decide,” said Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub. “Nobody is saying that it is fine and nobody is saying it’s okay for this guy to be going out and raising funds.’”<br />
<br />
Shortly after Hassan made the request, the FEC signaled that it would decide the technicalities of filing requirements while leaving the broader issue of who can run for president to the judicial branch. In an email to Hassan on July 18, the FEC stated that he understood “that although the Commission can respond to the questions asked in [his] advisory opinion, the Commission cannot make any determination as to whether [Hassan] can, as a naturalized citizen, serve as President.”<br />
<br />
The issue was made more contentious by comments and Internet postings by citizens, Tea Party advocates and “birthers,” who continue to press long-refuted claims that President Barack Obama was not born in America. About a dozen of these individuals wrote letters to the FEC stating that Hassan should not be allowed to run for president.<br />
<br />
In the face of this opposition, Hassan said before the vote that he believed that the FEC was making the decision in good faith based on the facts. But he added that it would be hard for commissioners not to be “influenced by the political sensitivity of the issue.”<br />
<br />
Hassan told Roll Call that his candidacy is not a stunt but rather an effort by a “political junkie” with various legislative interests. “I follow politics closely, but I have never held elected office,” he said. “I would admit that I am not well-known, and I would admit that my chances of winning are not as good as other candidates. That’s obvious.”<br />
<br />
Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-45834094230037803762011-08-24T20:08:00.000-07:002011-08-24T20:08:11.749-07:00OBAMA A LIVING & BREATHING NIGHTMARE<br />
An Israeli news columnist is scorching Barack Obama as possibly the worst U.S. president in history, calling him "a living and breathing nightmare."<br />
<br />
<br />
Yigal Walt of Ynetnews says Obama "is solidifying his status as the worst president in American history. The leader who promised us a bright future of peace and fraternity is leading the American empire – and the rest of the world with it – into a dark abyss."<br />
<br />
"Ever since he settled into the Oval Office, Obama has been hopping from one disaster to the next, making every possible mistake, boosting enemies and disregarding allies while ruining everything he touches in the process," Walt writes.<br />
<br />
"The Return of the Great Depression" warns everyone "it is not over. It has only begun" ...<br />
<br />
He says Obama was silent when the masses hit Iran's street and threatened to topple the ayatollah's regime. <br />
<br />
<strong><em><u><span style="color: yellow;">"Why should he support a struggle waged by freedom-hungry citizens against a radical Islamic dictatorship and chronic human rights violator? And so, a rare opportunity to change the face of a state that today constitutes the gravest threat to world and regional peace slipped away." </span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
<br />
Instead, Walt says, <strong><em><u><span style="color: yellow;">Obama buddied up to Syrian President Bashar Assad and remained silent, again, when Assad started butchering his own people. </span></u></em></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<em><u><span style="color: yellow;"></span></u></em></strong><br />
"For the time being, Obama keeps muttering, Assad keeps murdering, and the world keeps watching and doing nothing," Walt writes. <br />
<br />
Obama is also criticized for allegedly eroding NATO in the effort to oust Libya's Muammar Gadhafi. <br />
<br />
"And so, the once-intimidating NATO alliance found itself entangled above Libya's deserts for long months in a 'battle of giants' against a state whose army is sometimes reminiscent of a Jenin street gang from a decade ago," says Walt.<br />
<br />
"Now, with Gadhafi's rule finally drawing to an end, the <strong><em><u>president kindly took time off from his vacation to festively declare that the future is in the Libyan people's hands</u></em></strong> – <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">while local tribes are preparing for the imminent bloodshed and al-Qaida is reinforcing its hold on the country." </span></strong><br />
<br />
Walt's blistering attack on Obama concludes with a fondness communicated for Obama's predecessor. <br />
<br />
"The <strong><em><u><span style="color: cyan; font-size: large;">ongoing disaster</span></u></em></strong> called <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red; font-size: large;">Obama</span></strong> may prompt some of us to <strong><em><u>apologize to another American president, one George W. Bush</u></em></strong>," Walt writes. "He was called stupid, incoherent and naive; he was said to understand nothing and know nothing – yet now it turns out that the cowboy from Texas had a much better grasp on reality than his many critics. Even if his motives were at times as naive as Obama's, the former president combined them with an iron fist, immense determination and admirable loyalty to his allies. <br />
<br />
"Yet Bush is alread y a distant dream, while <strong><em><u><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red; font-size: large;">Obama is a living and breathing nightmare</span></u></em></strong>. Now all that's left is to wait and see whether America's citizens will be able to remove him from the White House before he destroys everything."<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow;">Read more: News column: Obama a 'living and breathing nightmare'</span><span style="color: cyan;"> </span></strong><a href="http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=337173#ixzz1W0O4udcU"><span style="color: cyan;"><strong>http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=337173#ixzz1W0O4udcU</strong></span></a> Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-48515169212256256312011-08-15T18:04:00.000-07:002011-08-15T18:15:51.975-07:00POINTS TO PONDERQuestion of the day :<br />
<br />
If you can answer this correctly, you can answer the question on what action to take on raising the Federal debt ceiling.<br />
<br />
You come home from work and find there has been a <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">sewer backup and you have sewage up to your ceilings.</span></strong><br />
<br />
What do you do? - <strong><em><u>raise the ceilings, or pump out the shit </u></em></strong><br />
CHARLES BRESSLER<br />
<br />
<br />
But of course the Democrat Party blames the Tea Party for <strong><span style="color: yellow;">bringing this existential threat to the <em><u>attention of the people</u></em> ! </span></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><u><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">“If you voted for Obama the first time to prove you were not racist, vote against him this time to prove you are not an idiot.” </span></u></strong><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQTPUG6BbqQQo06oRCqieTTMeqpppNTFz4Uk2lhmuJJzZwj9KsplmRffkhFTqzCBW3owFfwvpYGvu80zEYv25bGTA-jQ7Sf2W2FEf1VKIvgukZYITX4H_e4ywzdH1JgPwc_sjteL9c6NA/s1600/STEEP+SLIDE.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="293px" naa="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQTPUG6BbqQQo06oRCqieTTMeqpppNTFz4Uk2lhmuJJzZwj9KsplmRffkhFTqzCBW3owFfwvpYGvu80zEYv25bGTA-jQ7Sf2W2FEf1VKIvgukZYITX4H_e4ywzdH1JgPwc_sjteL9c6NA/s400/STEEP+SLIDE.bmp" width="400px" /></a></div><br />
<br />
Los Angeles Times ^ | 8/9/11 | Andrew Malcolm<br />
<br />
This is the 931st day of the Barack Obama presidency. (Snip) <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">Being a Real Good Talker (RGT) </span></strong>helped him get the job heading the law review. And entering politics. And succeeding early there, albeit within Chicago's rigged system. And being an RGT thrust him onto the national stage at the Democratic National Convention in 2004 when delegates had the foolish notion that John Kerry and John Edwards could win. Obama is very proud of his talking. In May this year he told a Boston fundraiser: "Back in 2004, I gave a little speech here that got some attention." <br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><u><span style="color: yellow;">“If you voted for Obama the first time to prove you were not racist, vote against him this time</span> <span style="color: cyan;">to prove you are not an idiot.” </span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNX8NxzJMkGQk7Gyltd3gFBH9XjXgN5D7LNyTl1ya5gbnc8159hl5p93u1wLsumMJoZLe-QHyWoLnVRO5BFSwqhRN7jfW7098cTCcq0_fBGWOfBySm-GPBm9179i19ZbQWbt24p9D4VzQ/s1600/YOU+GOT+IT+I+WANT+IT.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="227px" naa="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNX8NxzJMkGQk7Gyltd3gFBH9XjXgN5D7LNyTl1ya5gbnc8159hl5p93u1wLsumMJoZLe-QHyWoLnVRO5BFSwqhRN7jfW7098cTCcq0_fBGWOfBySm-GPBm9179i19ZbQWbt24p9D4VzQ/s400/YOU+GOT+IT+I+WANT+IT.bmp" width="400px" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj5E7tC52LZHdLfFZMc5E0hJkBgJIxQzT7CpqoyNVeC60PreqPzbBnGivAFucSZB1iZQbWG2LPcFoUjvPPUmOoSL6LMCkdBUHP3EQGUHE5D0CionCCYqUTYRDVELkeU6_nslUaPyrcvLOI/s1600/TYRANTS.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300px" naa="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj5E7tC52LZHdLfFZMc5E0hJkBgJIxQzT7CpqoyNVeC60PreqPzbBnGivAFucSZB1iZQbWG2LPcFoUjvPPUmOoSL6LMCkdBUHP3EQGUHE5D0CionCCYqUTYRDVELkeU6_nslUaPyrcvLOI/s400/TYRANTS.bmp" width="400px" /></a></div><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVBUDvTo32bKjlegkCWdPk0K04JyMG9KTqKyeAoDEFjCWg5PhaUmHqHQ6wVPRStgTGfgGBL1Cx5GMAE9r6rVUNt7aI73TTj9Tdr_K-5DB7Iof9HYcKvohsHI16iVAwwUhNvvKPdxNQv2I/s1600/BIDEN+SPENDING.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="292px" naa="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVBUDvTo32bKjlegkCWdPk0K04JyMG9KTqKyeAoDEFjCWg5PhaUmHqHQ6wVPRStgTGfgGBL1Cx5GMAE9r6rVUNt7aI73TTj9Tdr_K-5DB7Iof9HYcKvohsHI16iVAwwUhNvvKPdxNQv2I/s400/BIDEN+SPENDING.bmp" width="400px" /></a></div><br />
<br />
Illegitimate but voted in legally (like Obama himself), yet UNCONSTITUTIONAL "Gang of 12 Committee" that will decide on the Debt Ceiling, throws over <strong><span style="color: yellow;">500</span></strong> Members of Congress and Senators under the bus and removes their National, constitutionally power to legislate and make laws and obliges them to be ruled by a gang of 12 VERY entrenched partisans, who collectively have received <strong><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">$64,000,000 IN CONTRIBUTIONS from lobbyists!</span></strong><br />
<br />
A video posted online appears to show a Verizon picketer placing his young daughter in front of an oncoming truck — presumably carrying non-union employees — and then taunting the passengers with profanity-laced statements.<br />
<br />
Using that kind of foul language in front of a young girl, his daughter or not, is manipulative and wrong. He may or may not have a legitimate gripe but this action and also other strikers rippping apart wiring and phone equipment is wrong. Destruction by them is no better than what they claim as their grievance and their actions puts them in the wrong.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2011/08/verizon_strike_picketing.html"><strong><span style="color: cyan;">http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2011/08/verizon_strike_picketing.html</span></strong></a><br />
<br />
A bit like Obama ignoring dead SEAL family member requests to have no press to selfishly take advantage of a photo opportunity.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5SZ3zoRl_9yd5ucsOf6cwYeaCdCSJq_dOdSn5nLlLubewlFELTHBYrjjWy8qCf2T5Nht4QYvQzpyfIWKmgljvJFXp2NU-_fCv83nYJUboHZ5W2IbjGiCec4M9YcOfIiyCcFcUmSA8iSs/s1600/stealing+honor.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320px" naa="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5SZ3zoRl_9yd5ucsOf6cwYeaCdCSJq_dOdSn5nLlLubewlFELTHBYrjjWy8qCf2T5Nht4QYvQzpyfIWKmgljvJFXp2NU-_fCv83nYJUboHZ5W2IbjGiCec4M9YcOfIiyCcFcUmSA8iSs/s400/stealing+honor.bmp" width="400px" /></a></div><br />
<br />
Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-18943574977884393362011-08-09T20:07:00.000-07:002011-08-09T20:09:59.508-07:00SARAH PALIN ANALYSIS AUGUST 10, 2008<strong><em><span style="color: yellow;">THIS ANALYSIS WRITTEN BACK IN AUGUST <span style="color: red;"><span style="font-size: large;">2008</span> </span>HANDILY ADDRESSES FALSELY FOUNDED ATTACKS ON SARAH PALIN AND LAME-STREAM MEDIA DISINFORMATION.</span></em></strong><br />
<strong><em><span style="color: yellow;">AND EXAMINES HER STRENGTHS! </span></em></strong><br />
<span style="color: yellow;"><br />
</span><br />
<strong><em><span style="color: yellow;">WHICH HAVE BEEN ENRICHED AND INCREASED MULTIFOLD SINCE THEN AND WILL SERVE US ALL WELL WHEN SHE GETS ELECTED TO THE WHITE HOUSE .</span></em></strong><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong><em><span style="color: #cc0000; font-size: x-large;">OBAMA <span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">IS</span> OUR <span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">PAIN</span>!</span></em></strong></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong><em><span style="color: #cc0000; font-size: x-large;">THE <span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">SOLUTION</span> IS OUR <span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">PALIN</span>!</span></em></strong></div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong><em><span style="color: #cc0000; font-size: x-large;">===================================</span></em></strong></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br />
</div><br />
<strong>Governor Sarah Palin: a different image </strong><br />
<strong>By Mark S. McGrew</strong> <br />
<br />
Why all the mis-statements and vicious lies about Alaska’s Governor Sarah Palin? Why do the major newscasters show polls looking like McCain/Palin are neck and neck with Obama/Biden? Major newscasters use polls based on 700 people polled, or 1,000 people polled and in one case, less than 200 people were polled. There is no way such a small list can reflect a public opinion. I think it is fraudulent to suggest that it can. <br />
<br />
The day after the Palin-Biden debate, major network polls were showing again, a neck and neck rating, from small polls. But, DrudgeReport.com, with millions of readers ran a poll that over 550,000 readers responded to. The results, in the morning, when only 60,000 people had voted, showed Palin at 70% against Biden’s 28%. That same figure stayed the same all day long, until over 550,000 people had voted: Palin 70% vs Biden 28%. <br />
<br />
That figure seems a more accurate portrayal of informed people. Especially when you compare it with Governor Palin’s 84% approval rating in her home State. <br />
<br />
Why is Governor Palin so popular? It’s not her “home style” image. It’s not her looks or her winning personality or her old beauty pageants. <br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: #cc0000;">It is solely due to the fact that she respects and obeys her State Constitution and she respects and obeys the US Constitution. She respects and obeys the majority will of the citizens of Alaska and does what they want, not what powerful politicians or businesspeople want. </span></strong><br />
<br />
Exxon has owned some oil leases on Alaska’s North Slope for over 30 years, without developing them. Oil leases are good for 10 years and they expire, unless oil or gas is produced, and then the leases are valid as long as the production continues. Exxon has not produced any oil or gas from those leases in the entire 30 years they have controlled them. Year after year, they have filed a plan to drill and produce, but never followed through. <br />
<br />
The State of Alaska, under Governor Palin, decided enough was enough and cancelled Exxon’s rights to those leases this past spring. Exxon was using that land as a giant storage vault for oil that they knew to be there. Their inactivity deprived Alaska of income. Which in turn, deprived the citizens of Alaska of income and services. Exxon was not doing any favors for the citizens of Alaska by simply filing development plans for 30 years, so Alaska kicked them out. <br />
<br />
The right to bid on and control oil and gas leases in Alaska is open to any person who is eighteen years old or older. Alaska’s Constitution specifies that the policy of the State of Alaska is to “encourage the development of its resources by making them available for maximum use”. <br />
<br />
Allowing Exxon to control those leases, without exploiting them, was in violation of the Alaskan Constitution. Exxon is still fighting in the courts to get those leases back and just may succeed. <br />
<br />
A few years ago, after a State of the Union speech by President William J. Clinton, a man and a lady politician gave a summation after the address. The lady said, on national television, “We are not going to do things the Constitutional way anymore. We’re going to do things the practical way.” Amazingly, very few people watching “heard” what she said. It was just too bizarre to comprehend. <br />
<br />
Television, radio talk shows, movies, newspapers, news reporters, our police, courts, teachers, professors and politicians have gone to great lengths to make the American public believe that Constitutional Rights are “just something you see on television”. I think quite a few of the “authorities” actually believe that. <br />
<br />
Sarah Palin respects and obeys the Constitutions of both Alaska and The United States of America. This is why she is so vilified by the media liars and anti-American politicians. <br />
<br />
When she was the Mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, she attended a meeting along with a few Republican party members of Alaska. After she spoke, one of the men, Richard Wagner, told a good friend, “She should run for Governor.” His friend kind of rejected the idea as she was <br />
<br />
“only a small town Mayor”. But, he saw more of her and the more he saw, the more he liked. In time, they did launch her candidacy for Governor and she won. She won because of her staunch position to let the citizens of her State decide what the State should or should not do. Alaska was no longer under 100% control of the major oil companies and other corporations. The State had been retuned to the citizens who live there. What kind of a person would hate the people who did that? <br />
<br />
Richard Wagner and his friends are some of the very few individuals, out of thousands, who have bid on oil and gas leases and actually made a decent return. They knew first hand, with 40 years experience, just how difficult it was to buck the major oil companies. Forty years of trying, taught them just how difficult it was to deal with the State of Alaska officials and employees, many of whom were major oil company loyalists and ex-employees of oil companies. They were working overtime to stifle competition from private citizens, who were legally trying to get a fair share of the incredible oil wealth of Alaska. They fought long and hard to deprive Alaskan citizens of the right to provide a decent life for their families. <br />
<br />
Sarah Palin entered and changed the attitude and policies of her employees to give the little guys a chance. That is only one small reason why 84% of Alaskans respect her. And it is also the reason why 16% do not. In their minds, she robbed the rich to give to the poor. <br />
<br />
But she, and Rick Wagner’s friends, and most people in Alaska had only seen the rich robbing from the poor. And they set about to change that old feudal system. And they did. <br />
<br />
What if Sarah Palin were to win this Vice Presidential election and take her place in the new administration? What if she were to demand that our Constitution be respected and enforced? What if she demanded that libel and slander laws be enforced? What if she were to demand that all newscasters and radio talk show hosts stop lying? What if she were to demand that decency laws be enforced on movie makers and television show producers? What if she were to demand and enforce honesty in government? What if she were to enforce honesty in local governments? <br />
<br />
We are ruled and educated by liars. What if they were to disappear? <br />
<br />
These are the people who object to Sarah Palin. They would at the least, be out of a job, because all they know how to do is lie. At the best, they would all be put in prison for a long long time. This is why they do not want her in any position where she can change their ways. <br />
<br />
Sarah Palin is a serious threat to the evil entities that are in control now. She is a threat to their jobs and their way of life. They stand to lose their homes and their private bank accounts. <br />
<br />
24,000 lobbyists, just in Washington D.C. would be out of work. A lobbyist is someone who pays government officials and employees to either make a law for their benefit, or to eliminate a law that is not to their benefit. Most people call this bribery. Somehow, this system of lawmaking became acceptable and legal in the United States. If each lobbyist, doles out only $10,000 a year, each Senator and each Congressman would pocket about $400,000 a year in legal bribes. They very well may lose that source of fraudulent income with Palin running loose. <br />
<br />
The evil doers stand a good chance of losing their freedom as well. <br />
<br />
Sarah Palin says time after time, it never changes, “I do what the people want me to do”. <br />
<br />
Governor Palin says, “Drill baby drill”. Why does she keep saying that? <br />
<br />
Because the citizens of Alaska want that to happen. Why do the citizens of Alaska want to destroy their pristine wilderness with dirty nasty drilling operations? <br />
<br />
Because, Alaska has some of the strongest environmental protection laws in the world. A person can travel all over, in and out, across the tundra of the North Slope oil fields. That person can lay his lunch on top of any pipeline and not worry about getting oil on it. That person can sit down next to or under pipeline joints and not worry about staining his pants with oil. The North Slope is CLEAN. <br />
<br />
Caribou, Polar Bear and other wildlife populations have grown since developing Prudhoe Bay. Sarah Palin, and the people of Alaska advocate killing wolves and bears. That is because their population has grown to a point that these dangerous predators are hurting people and livestock. The predator population has to be thinned out to protect people, livestock and other wild animals. <br />
<br />
All States control predators. She is respecting the will of the people. <br />
<br />
Why else would citizens of Alaska want to Drill baby drill? Because it is insane not to. <br />
<br />
A hundred miles north of Fairbanks, population 50,000 or so, are two underground natural structures that may contain 500 million barrels of oil, each. <br />
<br />
A responsible oil producer, lacking unbridled greed and simply wanting to make a fair dollar and pass his discoveries on to the society that allowed him to make some serious money, may do something like this: <br />
<br />
He can take three wells, costing $8 million each and send 3,000 barrels per day to the local refinery in Fairbanks. He can have the oil refined into gasoline and sell his gasoline for $1.25 a gallon to every resident and tourist in Fairbanks. The 3,000 barrels per day will supply gasoline at that price and there are still more products that can be extracted and sold from that crude oil. One barrel of oil produces, according to Chevron Oil Company, 19.4 gallons of gasoline. It costs about $20 to find oil and get it to the refinery. Selling at $1.25, the producer will earn $24 per barrel, with $4 profit which would pay for the three wells in 10 years or less. <br />
<br />
The barrel of oil will also produce, home heating and diesel fuel 10.5 gallons, 4.1 gallons of kerosene jet fuel, 2.2 gallons of coke, 1.1 gallons of residual fuel oil, 1.5 gallons of liquefied refinery gases, 1.8 gallons of still gas, 1.4 gallons of asphalt and road oil, 1.1 gallons of raw material for petrochemicals, .4 gallons of lubricants, .2 gallons of kerosene and .4 gallons of other products that can be sold for cash. <br />
<br />
That 42 gallons in a barrel of oil produces 44.7 gallons of sellable product, which will give the producer another $20-50 for each barrel of oil. The profit then would be $24 to $54 on each barrel, for 3,000 barrels a day, making $26,000,000 to $60,000,000 a year. Half of that will go to expenses. Those two lonely oil fields, if produced, can supply Fairbanks for Nine Hundred Years. Those two oil fields, which are small by Alaska standards, could supply $1.25 a gallon gasoline and heating fuel for all the people of Alaska for 100 years or more. <br />
<br />
This is why Alaskans say, “Drill baby drill”. And this is why Sarah Palin strives to obey their will. That one lone man, producing oil in Alaska can give the entire State of Alaska gasoline for $1.25 and still make himself a fortune. And if he could also afford to give Alaskans $1.25 heating fuel, Alaskans would have the God given opportunity to prosper like no other State in America. <br />
<br />
Sarah Palin wants to increase the income of her fellow citizens. Her enemies want to decrease their income. With all the oil in Alaska, Alaskans pay the highest gasoline rate in the country. If someone did offer gasoline and heating fuel at $1.25 a gallon, the average family would be able to add $200 to $500 into their family’s budget each month. Fishing and crabbing boats could save $30,000 on a six week catch. Her enemies want that money to go to Golden Parachutes for major oil company executives. <br />
<br />
An average oil well on the North Slope of Alaska produces 3,000 barrels of oil per day. There are over 600 oil wells on the North Slope. Just 12 of those wells could produce gasoline and heating fuel for $1.25 a gallon for every citizen of Alaska. <br />
<br />
Jobs would be created, food would be cheaper, Alaskan Salmon would be cheaper, ALL Alaskan products would be cheaper to the world wide buyers. Citizens would not have to work two jobs and have their wives work full time. They would have the time and the finances to raise their kids to be good, loyal, productive Americans, respectful of all nations on Earth. The Native people of Alaska would be able to live the kind of life they want and not have to leave their ancestral homes and migrate to the foreign culture of cities, as they are doing now. <br />
<br />
Sarah Palin is about people. She is not about politics or corporations. She is a reflection of what the people in her State want. Isn’t this what all people on Earth want? <br />
<br />
Why is this person demonized? There has been no proof of wrong doing provided. Newscasters and writers provide only an onslaught of unsubstantiated accusations and insults, using a well planned list of adjectives backed up with a Thesaurus. If politicians and newscasters have to lie to the public to keep us from voting for her, they are enemies of the people and enemies of our United States Constitution. They have no legal right and no business trying to persuade people who to vote for. They are “Election Tampering” certainly, with any law breaking being ignored. <br />
<br />
The major problem in America now is that the policing authorities are out eating donuts. <br />
<br />
What if Sarah Palin were to make them do their jobs? <br />
<br />
People lie out of fear or because they want something that they can not get any other way. <br />
<br />
Obviously, if the media and the politicians are lying about Sarah Palin, they have a reason. And it’s not because of her personality, or her wardrobe, or her normal family or her so called “inexperience”. <br />
<br />
They lie about her and spread false rumors because they are afraid of her or because they want something they can not get any other way. <br />
<br />
What if Sarah Palin were to be elected and her President were to become incapacitated? <br />
<br />
This could be a very dangerous scenario for her enemies. Her enemies are our enemies. <br />
<br />
Would the people of the world suffer because of her beliefs and methods? <br />
<br />
Yes, some would suffer. But which ones? <br />
<br />
Mark McGrew has been active in the Alaska oil business for over 20 years. His website is at MincOil.com or you may email him at <a href="mailto:McGrewMX@aol.com">McGrewMX@aol.com</a> <br />
<br />
Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-78306521690775014592011-08-05T00:15:00.000-07:002011-08-05T00:15:31.306-07:00YIKES! THE POORLY "HIDDEN" COMMUNIST SUPPORT SURFACES!Yikes! Look who just endorsed Obama for four more years - Accuses GOP of 'racism, lies, economic sabotage' (August 03, 2011)<br />
By Aaron Klein<br />
<br />
<br />
Barack Obama at a presidential debate <br />
at Hofstra University in New York. <br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMfl_JrDfQEiDAN4lgAZYd1lp4OxR69_jdf4kMHr_ZarWBKzM_8EjdHvbydYQY1JCELqqZGreKjvBiab78hFklai0jYdZWcZAsgDbGOMR0EFK07TnXo1VC5F0JRftSpCmmKurXLCnNcCo/s1600/Hofstra+NYC.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMfl_JrDfQEiDAN4lgAZYd1lp4OxR69_jdf4kMHr_ZarWBKzM_8EjdHvbydYQY1JCELqqZGreKjvBiab78hFklai0jYdZWcZAsgDbGOMR0EFK07TnXo1VC5F0JRftSpCmmKurXLCnNcCo/s1600/Hofstra+NYC.bmp" t$="true" /></a></div><br />
<br />
It may be early in the campaign season, but the <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: #cc0000;">Communist Party USA</span></strong> already has <strong><em><u>seen fit to endorse Barack Obama for the 2012 election. </u></em></strong><br />
<br />
While noting he is disappointed with "some aspects" of the Obama administration's domestic and foreign policy, <strong><u><span style="color: red;">Sam Webb, chairman of the Communist Party USA</span></u></strong>, threw his support behind Obama's re-election bid. <br />
<br />
In an article last week at People's Weekly World, the official newspaper of the Communist Party USA, Webb discussed the <strong><em><u>need for a <span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">third party</span> consisting of the so-called working class and labor as well as "racially and nationally oppressed people, women, youth, immigrants, seniors, gay and straight." </u></em></strong><br />
<br />
Webb, however, recognized that such a party is not likely to emerge by next year. <br />
<br />
"<strong><u>Millions who have to be at the core</u></strong> of this party <strong><u><span style="color: red;">still operate under the umbrella of the Democratic Party, albeit increasingly in an independent fashion</span></u></strong>," he noted. <br />
<br />
Webb said that for communists there are major differences between Democrats and Republicans. He urged his supporters to <strong><u>continue to back the Democrats</u></strong>. <br />
<br />
Wrote Webb: "Neither party is anti-capitalist, but they aren't identical either. Differences exist at the levels of policy and social composition. And despite the many frustrations of the past two years, the election of Barack Obama was historic and <strong>gave space to struggle for a people's agenda." </strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">He argued that to separate from the Democrats now "would be contrary to our strategic policy of building maximum unity against right-wing extremism now and in next year's elections." </span></strong><br />
<br />
Continued Webb: "We are keenly aware of the fact that the agenda of the far right is to bring this administration and country to its knees, with a heavy dose of racism, lies and economic sabotage, setting the stage for a full blown return to power of the most reactionary, racist, anti-labor, anti-women, homophobic and militarist grouping in U.S. politics." <br />
<br />
"We want no part of that," wrote Webb. "We don't have any illusions about the Democratic Party, but we don't have any illusions about the Republican Party either." <br />
<br />
Webb concluded: "Furthermore, we are also aware of the undeniable fact that no other party besides the Democratic Party stands a chance of beating the GOP next year." <br />
<br />
<strong><u>Communist party covers up support for Obama </u></strong><br />
<br />
Last November, the Communist Party USA was <strong><em><u>caught scrubbing its website</u></em></strong> of references that stated it "actively supported" President Obama's election, as WND reported. <br />
<br />
An article posted on the party's official website on Dec. 30, 2007, previously stated,<strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;"> "Our Party actively supported Obama during the primary election." </span></strong><br />
<br />
The article was <strong><u><em>referring to Obama's 2004 election to the Senate</em></u></strong>. It detailed how the <strong>African-American community and trade unionists</strong> played key roles in defeating the "ultra right." <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitIIFR1JVkkP55rsI6FkRRyZ_-dMTurESmfJVZ0TVtqK1aytv9v7-Ola-DGuF1wTcKDEKJOayqwLLNTJ20hrYlwQmvKA3RqMglX65rnTK9sGhEOaR7PQbsj2U-Zxqgi1PwkmqWfYnxamM/s1600/communistbackobama.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitIIFR1JVkkP55rsI6FkRRyZ_-dMTurESmfJVZ0TVtqK1aytv9v7-Ola-DGuF1wTcKDEKJOayqwLLNTJ20hrYlwQmvKA3RqMglX65rnTK9sGhEOaR7PQbsj2U-Zxqgi1PwkmqWfYnxamM/s640/communistbackobama.jpg" t$="true" width="441px" /></a></div><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>(Screen shot of original article)</strong></div><strong>"</strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;"><strong><u>This was also reflected in the historic election of Barack Obama. Our Party actively supported Obama during the primary election,"</u></strong> </span>stated the article, a screen shot of which was captured by the New Zeal blog. The <strong><em><u>website has since been</u></em></strong> <strong><span style="color: #cc0000;">scrubbed</span></strong> of the reference to the <strong><em><u><span style="color: red;">Community Party USA aiding Obama</span></u></em></strong>, with the article now reading simply, "This was reflected in the historic election of Barack Obama." <br />
<br />
WND previously reported the official magazine of the Communist Party USA had lauded the important role of <strong><em><u>labor unions in electing Obama to the presidency in 2008</u></em></strong>. <br />
<br />
The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, or AFL-CIO, sponsored a poll showing union members supported Obama by a 68-30 margin and <span style="color: red;"><strong><span style="background-color: yellow;">strongly influenced their family members</span></strong>. </span><br />
<br />
According to the survey, Obama won among white men who are union members by 18 points. Union gun-owners backed Obama by 12 points, while union veterans voted for Obama by a 25-point margin. <br />
<br />
<strong><em><u>In the general population, Obama lost these groups by significant margins. </u></em></strong><br />
<br />
Political Affairs, the Community Party USA's magazine, quoted AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, a longtime member of the Boston chapter of the <strong><u><span style="color: #cc0000;">Democrat Socialists for America,</span></u></strong> expressing hope labor unions can <strong><u>continue working with Obama. </u></strong><br />
<br />
"The election is just step one in delivering the change we need," Sweeney said. "Working men and women are poised to keep the energy pumping to help <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">the Obama administration lead the change we need.</span></strong> There will be no gap or letdown." <br />
<br />
The communist magazine said priorities for labor unions are "regulating Wall Street and restoring fairness to international trade," as well as <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">"health-care reform"</span></strong> to provide coverage to <strong><em><u>"nearly 50 million people without insurance and make medical care affordable for all." </u></em></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><u>Communists map out Obama agenda </u></strong><br />
<strong><br />
<u></u></strong><br />
Immediately following the November 2008 presidential election, WND reported the Communist Party USA mapped out policies crucial for Obama to push through in his first term, including a <strong><span style="color: red;">"single payer" socialist health-care system; laws to make joining a labor union easier; raising the minimum wage and increasing labor union support. </span></strong><br />
<br />
In May 2009, WND reported the leader of the Communist Party USA declared that with Obama as president, <strong>health care and the economy can be "<span style="color: red;">reformed</span></strong>," U.S. <strong><u>troops</u></strong> can be <strong><u>evacuated</u></strong> from the Middle East, a <strong><u>second</u></strong> stimulus bill can be passed, the criminal justice system can be overhauled and <span style="background-color: yellow;"><span style="color: red;"><strong>union rights can be expanded</strong>. </span></span><br />
<br />
"All these – and many other things – are within our reach now!" exclaimed Webb in a New York banquet speech for the People's Weekly World, the official newspaper of the Communist Party USA. <br />
<br />
<br />
Yikes! <strong><a href="http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=329449#ixzz1U7bErtxp"><span style="color: cyan;">http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=329449#ixzz1U7bErtxp</span></a><span style="color: cyan;"> </span></strong>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-38412743608312964092011-07-31T14:05:00.000-07:002011-07-31T14:20:51.167-07:00SPENDING WHILE DEMOCRATS CONTROLLED ALL THREE BRANCHES<strong><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: yellow;">November 2006 .....8.5 Trillion <em><u>Democrats win over Congress</u></em></span></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: yellow;">January 2007 ........8.7 Trillion <em><u>Democrats in charge of Congress</u></em></span></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;">November 2007 .....9 Trillion</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;">January 2008 .........9.2 Trillion</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: yellow;">November 2008 ....10.5 Trillion <em><u>Democrats & Obama in Control</u></em></span></span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;">January 2009 .........10.6 Trillion</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;">January 2010 .........12.3 Trillion</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: yellow;">November <br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;">OBAMA UNABLE/UNWILLING TO GET A BUDGET PASSED EVEN THOUGH HE AND DEMOCRATS CONTROLLED ALL THREE PARTS OF GOVERNMENT! STILL HAS NOT PASSED A BUDGET AFTER OF OVER TWO YEARS OF TOTAL POWER BY DEMOCRATS. The last Obama budget <em><u>(more than 800 days ago</u></em>) was defeated in the SENATE 97-0 (zero). <span style="background-color: yellow;">NOBODY</span> voted for it, showing how bad it was.</span></span></span></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: yellow;"><span style="color: red;"> </span>2010 .....13.7 Trillion <em><u>Republicans win over US House <span style="color: red;">BUT NOT SENATE</span></u></em></span></span></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;">January 2011 .........14 Trillion <span style="color: red;">Republicans control US House only </span></span></strong><br />
<em><u><strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;"><span style="color: red;"> </span><span style="color: red;">Democrats continue CRAZY spending</span></span></strong></u></em><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: yellow; font-size: large;">July 2011 ...............14.3 Trillion</span></strong>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-89515858708882332212011-07-30T18:31:00.000-07:002011-07-30T18:45:45.726-07:00SAUDI FATWA AND SHARIA LAW IN AUSTRALIA - all being brought to America by ObaHussein<strong><em><u>Also note the comments made after this Saudi Fatwa article and the video below:</u></em></strong><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/raymond-ibrahim-new-saudi-fatwa-defends-pedophilia-as-marriage.html"><strong><span style="color: cyan;">http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/raymond-ibrahim-new-saudi-fatwa-defends-pedophilia-as-marriage.html</span></strong></a><strong><span style="color: cyan;"> </span></strong><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/iN7eQyrDt-U" width="640"></iframe><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/sharia-polygamy-and-wife-beating-in-australia.html"><strong>http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/sharia-polygamy-and-wife-beating-in-australia.html</strong></a><strong> </strong>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-50908703234203226232011-07-16T17:28:00.000-07:002011-07-16T17:39:28.694-07:00DEMOCRAT SENATORS - INCLUDING OBAMA - VOTED AGAINST RAISING THE DEBT CEILINGMarch 16th, 2006 - Every Senate Democrat - who VOTED "NO" to raise the debt ceiling and risk DEFAULT - are <em><u><strong>now</strong></u></em> - under runaway drunken spending demanding the GOP caves to their demands and White House threats to with-hold payments to our citizens rather than cut out and cut down SPENDING!<br />
<br />
These are who voted <strong><em><u>against</u></em></strong> a debt ceiling inrease. (Some no longer there!)<br />
<br />
Akaka (D-HI)<br />
Baucus (D-MT) <br />
Bayh (D-IN)<br />
Biden (D-DE) <br />
Bingaman (D-NM)<br />
Boxer (D-CA)<br />
<span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">Burns (R-MT)</span><br />
Byrd (D-WV) <br />
Cantwell (D-WA)<br />
Carper (D-DE)<br />
Clinton (D-NY) <br />
<span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">Coburn (R-OK)</span><br />
Conrad (D-ND)<br />
Dayton (D-MN)<br />
Dodd (D-CT) <br />
Dorgan (D-ND)<br />
Durbin (D-IL)<br />
<span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">Ensign (R-NV)</span><br />
Feingold (D-WI) <br />
Feinstein (D-CA)<br />
Harkin (D-IA)<br />
Inouye (D-HI)<br />
Jeffords (I-VT) <br />
Johnson (D-SD)<br />
Kennedy (D-MA)<br />
Kerry (D-MA)<br />
Kohl (D-WI) <br />
Landrieu (D-LA)<br />
Lautenberg (D-NJ)<br />
Leahy (D-VT) <br />
Levin (D-MI)<br />
Lieberman (D-CT)<br />
Lincoln (D-AR)<br />
Menendez (D-NJ) <br />
Mikulski (D-MD)<br />
Murray (D-WA)<br />
Nelson (D-FL)<br />
Nelson (D-NE) <br />
<span style="background-color: yellow; color: red; font-size: large;"><strong>Obama (D-IL)</strong></span><br />
Pryor (D-AR)<br />
Reed (D-RI)<br />
Reid (D-NV) <br />
Rockefeller (D-WV)<br />
Salazar (D-CO)<br />
Sarbanes (D-MD) <br />
Schumer (D-NY)<br />
Stabenow (D-MI)<br />
Wyden (D-OR) <br />
<br />
They NOW claim that <strong><em><u>not</u></em></strong> voting for the raising of the deficit AND RAISING TAXES is RECKLESS but REFUSE to acknowledge that the WILD spending by lunatic ideologist OBAMA and his administration is EVEN MORE RECKLESS since we can get around a default. We have had our government shut down a few times and under REPUBLICAN captainship came through with flying colors - NOT A DEFAULT!<br />
<br />
<strong><u><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><em>And we are still financing IMF (International Monetary Fund) with HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of tax dollars and to support GREECE in the BILLIONS, the UNITED NATIONS in billions AND while we cannot pay for essential roads and infrastructure in the USA we are paying some </em><span style="background-color: yellow;"><span style="color: cyan;"><span style="background-color: black;"><em>150 BILLION to RESTORE AND</em> </span></span><span style="background-color: black; color: cyan;">REPAIR, REBUILD MOSQUES</span> <em>-</em></span><em> YES, ISLAMIC BUILDINGS IN EGYPT AND ELSEWHERE WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS!!!!!!!!!!!!</em></span></u></strong>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-50216196338437281332011-06-24T20:53:00.000-07:002011-06-24T21:35:29.993-07:00OBAMA BACK ON HEAVY DUTY DRUGS OR VERY, VERY BRAIN DAMAGED?By Jim Hoft (with editing by AntiMullah)<br />
<br />
This was absolutely awful. <br />
<br />
Barack Obama made another horrible mistake today. The president visited the 10th Mountain Division today and congratulated them on their service. Then he told the soldiers that he had given the Medal of Honor to Jared Monti who came back from Iraq alive. <strong><em><u>Jared Monti was actually killed in Iraq in 2006. <span style="color: red;">How sad</span>. </u></em></strong><br />
<br />
“First time I saw 10th Mountain Division, you guys were in southern Iraq. When I went back to visit Afghanistan, you guys were the first ones there. I had the great honor of seeing some of you because a comrade of yours, Jared Monti, was the first person who I was able to award the Medal of Honor to who actually came back and wasn’t receiving it posthumously.“ <br />
<br />
Blackfive caught the president’s horrible gaffe. <br />
<br />
As we all know, <strong><span style="background-color: yellow; color: red;">SSG Sal Giunta,</span></strong> of the 173rd Airborne, was the <strong><em><u><span style="color: red;">first and ONLY living recipient EVER IN USA HISTORY </span></u></em></strong> (2011) of the MOH who fought in Iraq/Afganistan. SFC Jared Monti, 10th Mountain Division, was KIA in Afghanistan in 2006. He was posthumously awarded the MOH by Obama in 2009. <br />
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3OWeXdcO3rgQkd9dUNbjFzvn47Ua6dkPGfMrzlm525xmhSAfLqFzzwjzeMMVjSONGUhjIwYjaAUg3yPD15VtEXO_RPadrQFgOXRPPrlcyAnb3eiyNAwPq4RY5MlEcVqHXVYgEdeNVYQo/s1600/alg_medal_of_honor.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="296" i$="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3OWeXdcO3rgQkd9dUNbjFzvn47Ua6dkPGfMrzlm525xmhSAfLqFzzwjzeMMVjSONGUhjIwYjaAUg3yPD15VtEXO_RPadrQFgOXRPPrlcyAnb3eiyNAwPq4RY5MlEcVqHXVYgEdeNVYQo/s400/alg_medal_of_honor.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #cc0000;">LOOK! OBAMA PRESENTS MEDAL OF HONOR WITH A SNEER OF DISTASTE</span></strong></td></tr>
</tbody></table> <br />
How does the "Commander-in-Chief" mix these heroes up? <strong><em><u>He put that medal around Giunta’s neck and he stood with Monti’s parents as they grieved.</u></em></strong><br />
<br />
We have a <strong><span style="color: red;">25th Amendment, Article 4</span></strong> individual in the Oval Office, who needs to be removed from office for <u><em><strong>inability</strong></em></u> to carry out the responsibilities of the office of President. Unless aiding and abetting our enemies has been recently added to those duties. In that he does very well.<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ATPY52D6A4U" width="640"></iframe>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7056390338070199145.post-5115732505223768202011-06-16T20:31:00.000-07:002011-06-16T20:31:32.389-07:00BILL O'REILLY HAS BECOME AN OBAMABOT SHILL!INVESTIGATION GETTING CLOSER TO UNRAVELLING THE OBAMA SOCIAL SECURITY RECORDS <strong><em><u>despite Bill O'reilly runnning interference</u></em></strong>!<br />
<alerts@alerts.worldnetdaily.com><br />
<br />
Much information has been reported – and much more still is being sought – about Barack Obama’s original birth documentation and whether it reveals his eligibility to be president under the Constitution’s requirement those in the Oval Office be a “natural born Citizen.”<br />
<br />
But under the radar of most news organizations a case has been moving forward in Washington, D.C., through which California attorney Orly Taitz is seeking the original application for Obama’s Social Security number, a document that could reveal a multitude of factors about the president’s early life.<br />
<br />
U.S. District Court Chief Judge Royce Lamberth this week rejected a defense concern over procedure in the dispute, and Taitz told WND today the case has moved into discovery and she can issue subpoenas to those holding the documentation she is seeking.<br />
<br />
For those who never wondered about how Social Security Numbers are generated, the first three digits represent the state of the applicant’s mailing address. In other words, if you applied for a Social Security Number while living in Connecticut, for example, the first three digits of your SSN will correspond to the Connecticut code.<br />
<br />
The first three digits of Obama’s SSN are 042. That code of 042 falls within the range of numbers for Connecticut, which according to the Social Security Administration has been 040 through 049.<br />
<br />
The national news media has been virtually silent on this potentially criminal fact.<br />
Indeed, when Fox News finally attempted to explain it, it broadcast false information and then scrubbed it from its website.<br />
<br />
When WND asked the White House about it, then-Press Secretary Robert Gibbs dodged the question.<br />
<br />
Taitz’ case is against Social Security commissioner Michael Astrue and explains that because of the multitude of questions surrounding Obama’s eligibility, his birth certificate and his other records, the Freedom of Information Act request was submitted.<br />
<br />
The Social Security Administration rejected it, and that decision was affirmed by a district court ruling that found the administrative procedures still had a course to run. But that now has been completed and the case is before Lamberth again.<br />
<br />
He ruled this week that FOIA actions “are exempt” from a local court “meet and confer” requirement and he gave Astrue 30 days to file “any dispositive motions.”<br />
<br />
The federal government had argued that Taitz’ process to subpoena individuals with access to the long-sought documentation was out of order, but the court ruling means it is within procedures.<br />
<br />
According to a report in the Post & Email online blog, Taitz reported, <strong><span style="color: #cc0000;">“We’re now in discovery, so I can issue subpoenas.”</span></strong><br />
<br />
That is a level that no other case challenging Obama’s eligibility or birth certificate ever has reached.<br />
<br />
She said she already has contacted the Hawaii Department of Health, which is custodian of Hawaiian records, about her requests, and she said another recipient very well could be the White House.<br />
<br />
She noted that White House Counsel Robert Bauer resigned that post on June 2, and suggested Bauer might not have wanted to be deposed regarding questions about Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth,” a document presented to the nation as genuine when the White House released it on April 27 Taitz suggested that Bauer’s move back into private practice may have been speeded by worries over the eligibility dispute.<br />
<br />
In fact, Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., and author of “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President,” said he’s convinced Bauer’s move is because he fears the “Certificate of Live Birth” document would not stand up to the scrutiny of any serious investigation.<br />
<br />
Corsi believes Bauer “felt compelled” to resign because of the growing substance to worries that the eligibility issue will blow up into a full-scale investigation.<br />
<br />
“Bauer sent Perkins and Coie attorneys to Honolulu to pick up from the Hawaii Department of Health what he believed would be two certified copies of Obama’s 1961 long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate,” Corsi said. “When the White House released to the public the birth certificate in the form of a PDF computer file obviously created on Adobe software and a Xerox copy, <strong><em><u>Bauer realized the Hawaii DOH had participated in the fraud.”</u></em></strong><br />
<br />
He said he had been tipped off early in February that a long-form birth document for Obama had been forged and that the document was to be released. As WND has reported, there long have been concerns about the Social Security number.<br />
<br />
“There is obviously a case of fraud going on here,” says Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels. “In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”<br />
<br />
“There is obviously a case of fraud going on here,” says Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels. “In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”<br />
<br />
Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?<br />
“Never,” Daniels told Corsi. “It’s against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security Number issued.”<br />
<br />
Daniels said she is “staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama’s use of this Social Security Number is fraudulent.”<br />
<br />
“A person who wants to hide their true identity often picks up the Social Security Number of a deceased person, thinking that nobody would ever look into it,” Daniels added. “I think it was <strong><em><u>sometime in the 1980s that Obama decided to hide who he really is.”</u></em></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><em><u><span style="color: #cc0000;">ALAN NOTE: assuming he even knows!</span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.<br />
<br />
Nor is there any suggestion in Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” that he ever had a Connecticut address.<br />
<br />
Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.<br />
<br />
An affidavit filed by Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson specifies that as a result of his formal training as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law enforcement, “it is my knowledge and belief that Social Security Numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence.”<br />
<br />
Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security Number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.<br />
<br />
“I doubt this is President Obama’s originally issued Social Security Number,” she told WND.<br />
<br />
“Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security Number in Hawaii.”<br />
<br />
The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice-cream shop still was in operation one year after Obama’s inauguration.<br />
<br />
Just last month some 11 months after WND began publicizing Obama’s Connecticut-based SSN, Bill O’Reilly of the Fox News Channel briefly addressed the issue while reading his viewer mail on the air.<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: #cc0000;">Unfortunately for O’Reilly, the news anchor falsely asserted the president’s father lived in Connecticut.</span></strong><br />
<br />
In his viewer email segment April 13, O’Reilly was asked: “What about Obama having a Connecticut Social Security Number? He never lived there.”<br />
<br />
<strong><em><u>“His father lived in Connecticut for several years,” O’Reilly claimed, adding that “babies sometimes get numbers based on addresses provided by their parents.”</u></em></strong><br />
<br />
In reality, there is <strong><em><u>no evidence</u></em></strong> Barack Obama Sr. ever lived in Connecticut. He left Hawaii in 1962 to study at Harvard in Massachusetts and then returned to his home country of Kenya.<br />
<br />
When WND publicized O’Reilly’s major error, <strong><em><u><span style="color: #cc0000;">the information vanished from the Fox News Channel’s website, as well as BillOReilly.com </span></u></em></strong><br />
<br />
The BirtherReport.com website, responding to complaints by Fox podcast customers that O’Reilly’s Social Security claim, broadcast on Fox, had gone missing from the audio archive, trumpeted the headline: <br />
<br />
“Busted: Fox News scrubbed Bill O’Reilly’s 4/13 mailbag segment on Obama’s Social Security Number reserved for Connecticut applicants.” <br />
<br />
The site added, “Not only did Fox News scrub the podcast, they <u><strong><em>also left out the viewer email about Obama’s Social Security number at O’Reilly’s website.</em></strong> <strong><span style="color: red;">I</span></strong></u><strong><span style="color: red;"> report, you decide!”</span></strong>Alan Petershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15518570634735418114noreply@blogger.com0