Tuesday, December 29, 2009


UNRWA and also a Syria report

From nw_arizona_granny
12/28/2009 11:45:07 AM PST replied

UNRWA - Its Link to Terror and HAMAS (back)

December 10, 2009

by Yoav Sorek

The Israeli Initiative

As we mentioned last week, UNRWA claims to be a neutral organization, but has proven time and again to be a puppet of the Palestinian National movement and of terror. In this chapter, we will specify how UNRWA is linked to these dangerous groups.

UNRWA As a Support for the Palestinian National Movement

Even if UNRWA was not directly connected to terrorist groups, its existence would be enough to support Palestinian Nationalism. Since UNRWA does not rehabilitate refugees, it perpetuates the refugee situation, by providing many refugees with relatively comfortable conditions: housing in the camps, education, medical care and other welfare services.

The refugees are an essential part of the Palestinian National narrative; Palestinian leaders have insisted on the ‘right of return’ since the movement’s inception. This card has been played to block Israeli attempts to bring peace time and again. As long as UNRWA is around to maintain the refugee problem, there cannot be a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the Palestinians can continue in their war against ‘the Zionist entity.’

UNRWA admits, and is even proud, that it identifies politically with the Palestinian National Movement. In 2004, former commissioner-general Peter Hansen said that, while UNRWA is supposed to be ‘above the fray’ and not political, he found that in ‘good conscience [he] cannot turn a blind eye’ to his perceived infringement of the refugees’ human rights by Israel. According to Hansen, it comes down to ‘human rights’ as opposed to ‘simple assistance.’

The current commissioner-general, Karen Abu-Zayd, has the same approach. She has spoken out in an unbalanced matter, which has generated negative PR, causing grave damage to Israel’s image. A recent example of UNRWA’s politicization is a one-man play written by and starring UNRWA spokesman Chris Gunness, in which he accuses the IDF of using illegal white phosphorus to bomb a warehouse in Gaza. This behavior moves UNRWA out of the realm of humanitarian aid and squarely in the political arena.

The UNRWA-terror link is not a new problem. Over 25 years ago, Lebanese ambassador to the UN Edward Ghorra complained that UNRWA camps in Lebanon had been taken over by terrorists. Soon after, UNRWA released a detailed report which described how its educational institute at Siblian, near Beirut, had become a military training base for PLO fighters.

In recent years, similar connections have been found in Judea, Samaria and Gaza. IDF incursions into camps as a part of Operation Defensive Shield in 2002, as a response to the second Intifada, revealed that UNRWA camps were filled with explosive labs, arms factories and suicide bombing cells.

One camp, Jenin, received more attention than others, when the IDF was met with strong resistance from terrorists located there in April 2002. A report to Marwan Barghouti, the head of the Tanzim, the military wing of Fatah, described the UNRWA camp as ‘characterized by an exceptional presence of fighters who take the initiative [to perform] nationalist activitiesThey are ready for self-sacrifice by any means. It is not surprising that Jenin [is nicknamed] the suiciders’ capital [A’simat Al-Istashidin, in Arabic]’

UNRWA administrators claim to be unaware of terrorist activities in the camps. Karen Abu-Zayd, for example, declared: ‘We just don’t see anything like this.’ It is unfeasible that camps could become ‘suiciders’ capitals’ without the knowledge of UNRWA personnel. These denials imply, at best, turning a blind eye, and at worst, implicit consent.

Terrorist Domination of UNRWA Labor Unions

It seems unlikely that UNRWA’s administration would not know about terrorist activities in their camps, when Hamas is the leading party in refugee-camp elections. The various UNRWA labor unions (teachers, civil service and general UNRWA workers) hold elections every three years to elect 27 representatives. The PLO, Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine all run for seats; all of these parties, except for the PLO, are on the European Union’s and the United States’ list of terrorist groups. Hamas has dominated UNRWA’s unions in the Gaza Strip since 1990, often winning all 11 seats in the UNRWA teachers’ union, giving them complete control of education. Results for the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas’s parent organization, have been similar in Jordan and Lebanon.

Senior UNRWA officials have openly supported Palestinians’ armed campaign against the State of Israel. In 2008, Amir Al-Misehal, the head of the UNRWA civil service sector stated ‘what was taken by force will only be restored by force and not by peace or resolutions.’ Karen Abu-Zayd attended and spoke at the same event. The UNRWA workers’ union in Jordan announced their solidarity with the Palestinian people, and decided that every worker would contribute one day’s salary to the families of suicide bombers. The funds were transferred through UNRWA’s Relief and Social Services department.

When UNRWA’s administration started monitoring workers, the unions issued a statement opposing these activities. Union heads refused to report on UNRWA teachers’ terrorist activities, and wrote letters calling on John Ging, then-director of UNRWA’s operations, to reinstate teachers who had been fired on suspicion of links to terror. In addition, in a 2005 event honoring 100 teachers from Khan Yunis (an UNRWA camp in Gaza) for academic excellence, an award was given to Dr. Yunes Al-Astal, who also happens to be a high-ranking Hamas official that openly preaches in favor of terrorist attacks against Israel. At the event, Khaled Madi, a teacher in UNRWA schools said ‘those worthy of being honored are the teachers who sacrificed their lives for the sake of Allah and the homeland,’ and proceeded to list ‘shaheeds’ (martyrs) who taught in UNRWA schools.

This is only a fraction of the examples of cooperation between UNRWA and terrorists. There are long lists of teachers and other workers for UNRWA that are active members of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Fatah, Al-Qassam Brigades, Al-Aqsa Brigades, and other known terrorist groups.


UNRWA in Gaza and Terror Groups: The Connection. Center for Near East Policy Research, Ltd., Jerusalem. 3242009.

Kushner, Arlene, UNRWA: Overview and Policy Critique. Center for Near East Policy Research, Ltd., Jerusalem. November, 2008.

Source: http://www.israelunitycoalition.org/news/article.php?id=4861

Appeasement Policy towards Syria Not Working (back)

December 26, 2009

LONDON — The shifting sands in Syria’s geopolitical neighborhood has strengthened its ties to Iran, a relationship that is unlikely to be affected by Western incentives.

A report by the International Crisis Group asserted that Syria would not sever its strategic alliance with Iran. ICG, regarded as close to the European foreign policy establishment, said the regime of President Bashar Assad would try to balance relations with Iran and Turkey.

‘Teheran remains a valued and indispensable partner, especially in a context of regional uncertainty,’ the report, titled ‘Reshuffling the Cards: Syria’s Evolving Strategy,’ said. ‘The long relationship provides military assets and security cooperation, as well as diplomatic leverage in dealing with Western and Arab countries.’

The report said Syria’s relationship with Iran has enabled Damascus to resist neighboring Iraq and pressure by other Sunni regimes. ICG said Teheran has also benefited the Assad regime, beset by economic woes and regional tension.

‘As long as Syria’s environment remains unsettled, in short, it will maintain strong ties to Iran; at the same time, it will seek to complement that relationship with others — Turkey, France, and now Saudi Arabia — to broaden its strategic portfolio and to signal a possibly different future,’ the report said.

ICG said little was known of the decision-making within the Assad regime.

The report cited Assad’s roots in the Alawite minority, hated by the Sunni majority and fearful of being seen as capitulating to either Israel or the West.

‘From Syria’s vantage point, there is good reason to cling to the status quo,’ the report said. ‘For almost four decades, it has served Damascus well. Despite a turbulent and often hostile neighbourhood, the regime has proved resilient. It has used ties to various groups and states to amass political and material assets, acquiring a regional role disproportionate to its actual size or resources. One does not readily forsake such allies or walk away from such a track record.’

In contrast, Assad regards Turkey as a facilitator of Syria’s economy. The report said Assad sees Turkey as a means for increased tourism, investment and regional cooperation dominated by Syria.

Syria’s President Bashar Assad, right, welcomes Lebanese Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri at the Teshrin presidential palace in Damascus on Dec. 19. Reuters/Khaled al-Hariri

‘Damascus’s relationships to Ankara and Teheran differ in ways that are fundamental and that offer instructive insights on both,’ the report said. ‘Iran supplies military hardware to Syria, which in turn serves as a corridor for Hizbullah-bound weapons. Other alleged areas of collaboration include Iranian support for Syria’s internal security apparatus and the construction of a nuclear facility currently under investigation by the International Atomic Energy Agency.’

The report said Iran has become a key weapons supplier to Syria in wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1992. Still, Teheran has not become Syria’s sponsor, and Iranian missiles have not overcome Israel’s strategic superiority.

‘For Damascus, Teheran remains an indispensable partner in a context of ongoing regional instability and strategic uncertainty,’ the report said. ‘The relationship provides much-needed military hardware; diplomatic leverage in dealing with Western and Arab countries. The partnership with Ankara serves separate purposes.’

Meanwhile, a report by the American Enterprise Institute said the Obama administration has failed to nudge Syria away from Iran’s orbit and toward that of so-called moderate Arab states. Authored by resident scholar and former Pentagon official Michael Rubin, the report said Damascus continues to serve as Iran’s facilitator throughout the Levant.

‘There is no evidence, however, that the State Department’s engagement policy has worked,’ the report, titled ‘The Enduring Iran-Syria-Hizbullah Axis.’ said. ‘Nor does it appear that Teheran and Damascus have loosened their relations.’

The report said Syria continues to proliferate weapons, particularly in allowing Iranian arms to reach Hizbullah in Lebanon. Rubin cited U.S. and Israeli interdictions of Iranian weapons shipments to Syria in 2009.

‘The Obama administration would like to move Syria into the camp of more moderate Arab states, but there is scant evidence that Syria is willing to give up its support for terrorist organizations,’ the report said. ‘Like Iran, it remains a destabilizing and dangerous force in the region.’

‘Given both the circumstances and the stakes, it is ironic that U.S. officials continue to accept the fiction of Syrian sincerity,’ the report said. ‘As difficult as stopping terrorist supplies may be, the likelihood that proxy groups will voluntarily forfeit their capability is low, and the cost of allowing terrorists to use such arms is high.’

The report, released as the White House resumed its dialogue with Damascus, said Iran and Syria continue to employ Hizbullah and other proxies against Israel and other rivals in the Middle East. Syria was also said to have been helping Hizbullah prepare for a new war with the Jewish state.

‘Iran may be Hizbullah’s chief patron, but Syria is the lynchpin that makes Iranian support for foreign fighters possible,’ the report said. ‘While Israel may be the immediate target of the Iran-Syria nexus, the partnership threatens broader U.S. interests.’

The report said additional Iranian weapons to Syria might move through Turkey. In 2009, Syria and Turkey increased border cooperation as well as embarked on their first military exercises.

‘The Turkish route into Syria may become more important as Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan tightens relations with both Teheran and Damascus,’ the report said.

Source: http://www.geostrategy-direct.com/geostrategy-direct/secure/ 2009/12_30/do.asp

Saturday, December 26, 2009


Editor's note: Philip J. Berg, former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania and an activist attorney who brought a lawsuit challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama to become president of the United States, has written the following reply to Jamie Freeze's Dec. 22 RenewAmerica article "Facts are stubborn things: Obama is a natural-born citizen."

Jamie Freeze, a law student, has arrogantly called any of us who question Soetoro/Obama's citizenship status and constitutional eligibility to serve as U.S. President — a constitutional right of ours, of course — incompetent idiots.

Ms. Freeze, however, may want to continue her education. Part of being a lawyer, a very important part, is being able to comprehend what you read and to cite the correct law to collaborate it, something Ms. Freeze has clearly failed to do.

Jamie Freeze received battlefield experience in the war of ideology while attending the University of North Carolina at Greensboro (aka UNC-Gomorrah).

While earning a bachelor's degree in political science and history, she served as Vice President of the College Republicans and was the lone conservative opinion columnist for The Carolinian, UNCG's student newspaper.

After surviving college without becoming a liberal, she graduated in 2009 and is currently working toward a law degree at Regent University. You can contact Jamie at:


In her schoolgirlish, wide-eyed fashion she also wrote....
"I don't understand how a Christian can be a Republican"

Phil Berg says:

I will respond below to Ms. Freeze's allegations. My responses are in Bold Italic. I also want to make very clear to all readers that none of the eligibility cases have been heard, litigated, or dismissed based on the law pertaining to any of the issues raised. Instead, the eligibility cases have been dismissed on the basis of "STANDING" only.

Alan note: as can be seen in an article below this one, tenacious Attorney Orly Taitz has filed for a move of venue for this very reason.

This type of thing by Ms. Freeze is what gives folks the WRONG information and confuses them. It is a deception by Ms. Freeze (as a law student, I hope her professors teach her how to properly, honestly, and with integrity investigate, research the laws, properly cite the laws, and argue issues before her).

Otherwise, she will be unable to do her clients — when that time comes, assuming she passes the bar — justice.

(Alan: Without perjuring them or herself)


December 22, 2009

Facts are stubborn things: Obama is a natural-born citizen
By Jamie Freeze

I never will forget meeting former North Carolina State Senator Hugh Webster my senior year of high school. He came to my school and had lunch with the seniors. As he sat down beside me, I asked him to tell me what he most loved and hated about being in Raleigh. I don't remember what he most loved, but I'll never forget what he most hated. In the words of Mr. Webster, "I don't deal well with incompetent people."

Ms. Freeze, unfortunately, is showing her "INCOMPETENCE," as Ms. Freeze would call it, but I feel "IGNORANCE" is the more appropriate word, as outlined below.

At that point, I knew Mr. Webster and I were kindred spirits. I too don't deal well with incompetent people. As a matter of fact, I go out of my way to avoid them, but when dealing with them is inevitable, I can't help but point out their incompetencies. As a law student, I am being trained to be meticulous, well-reasoned, and intelligent.

After my final exam grades come back, we'll see how well I'm doing. But that aside, I feel that I have been too longsuffering in letting the Birther Movement receive simply a few caustic remarks and jabs from me. It's time for me to call a spade a spade.

Here goes: If you believe that President Obama is NOT a natural-born citizen, then you are an incompetent idiot who is probably watching Glenn Beck while wearing a tin-foil hat. You probably think Obama's a Muslim too.

Alan Note: absolutely yes to both!

Our lawsuits have nothing to do with Soetoro/Obama's religion, they never have. Ms. Freeze seems to have lost a very important part of her education. We as people are entitled to redress, and we as people are entitled to ask questions, especially of our elected officials. Incompetent idiot?

It appears that Ms. Freeze's law school has taught her that when you cannot counter something, call the opposing party names. That is not what I was taught in school. I do not see one shred of evidence that supports Ms. Freeze's position. Ms. Freeze obviously forgot about Barry Soetoro's name:

Did she locate where he legally changed his name to Barack H. Obama?

It is fraud to run for and serve as President under an "alias" name.

What about Soetoro/Obama's Indonesian citizenship? We have the school record, which Soetoro/Obama has admitted too.

If you are still reading (and not firing off angry emails), then allow me to offer you factual proof that Obama is a natural-born citizen who satisfies the constitutional requirements for Commander-in-Chief.

My argument is two-fold:

1. Obama was born in Hawaii (a U.S. state for my incompetent readers).

2. Obama satisfies the requirements found in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which defines natural-born citizens.

Where is the factual proof?  Ms. Freeze apparently forgot to attach it.

What does Ms. Freeze have to back up the assertion that Soetoro/Obama was born in Hawaii?

We have been unable to obtain verification of that — no long form birth certificate, only an image that has been deemed a forgery. Despite this, what about his Indonesian citizenship? Had Ms. Freeze read our briefs, and retained the information, she would have seen that all we do is talk about the Nationality Act of 1940, revised in 1952.

1. Obama was born in Hawaii. Hawaii joined the Union in 1959. Barack Obama was born in 1961. Do the math. It works. Ok, so perhaps that argument is a bit over-simplified, but that is because I find the birth certificate question so ridiculous.

The President released his birth certificate (which was verified by the Hawaii Health Department) yet conspiracy theorists refuse to see logic. "Big bad Obama must be hiding something. That certificate isn't the long form. What's he hiding?" What the naysayers fail to realize is that in 1961 the standard Hawaiian birth certificate was...wait for it...exactly the same length as Obama's!

The Hawaiian Health Department has said this, but as conspiracy theorists point out, they must be covering for Obama. Despite the facts, folks say that even if he was born in Hawaii, he is not a natural born citizen because his father was Kenyan. However, even if Obama was born on the moon, he would still be a natural born citizen under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

First, the "long version" birth certificate we are asking for has nothing do to with the size of the document itself, instead it has to do with the information on the document.

We have never claimed Hawaii was not a state of the Union, so this has nothing to do with the questions we are seeking answers too. Soetoro/Obama released two (2) forged images of a Certification of Live Birth, claiming it to be his birth certificate.

The Hawaii Health Department has NEVER verified the images placed on the internet.

Law 101: No agency or person can look at an online image and state the document came from their agency or location, unless the person making such statement was the one who personally printed the document in question (Soetoro/Obama's Certification of Live Birth in this case) and handed it to Soetoro/Obama and can prove it is in fact the same document.

In Soetoro/Obama's case, his campaign office stated they mailed the application for his Certification of Live Birth to Hawaii and received this supposed document back from Hawaii. However, on the date that Soetoro/Obama would have signed it, Soetoro/Obama was traveling campaigning.

We are not disputing the length of Soetoro/Obama's Certification of Live Birth. We have copies of others' actual Certificate of Live births from the same time period. These are two (2) completely different documents.

Soetoro/Obama has never released a hard copy of any type of Certification of Live Birth or Certificate of Live Birth to anyone other than Factcheck.org, which is part of Annenberg and, yes, who Soetoro/Obama has close ties with.

I am wondering what Ms. Freeze is basing her unsubstantiated statements on. Maybe she will enlighten us.

We are not questioning the British father, as we are well aware of the fact that if Soetoro/Obama was born on U.S. soil, which we do not believe, he would in fact be a U.S. "natural born" citizen.

However, in fairness to Ms. Freeze, others have questioned the British citizenship of the father and claimed that even if Soetoro/Obama was born on U.S. soil, he would not be a "natural born" U.S. citizen due to his father's foreign citizenship status.

I'm going to ask again, what about Soetoro/Obama's legal name and his Indonesian citizenship status?

Ms. Freeze fails to address these very important issues. We have been unable to locate any legal documentation legally changing Soetoro's name back to Barack H. Obama; where Soetoro/Obama relinquished his Indonesian citizenship; and/or where Soetoro/Obama reclaimed any U.S. citizenship status he may have once held. Again, hopefully Ms. Freeze will enlighten us.

2. Obama is a natural born citizen. In Scales v. INS, 232 F.3d 1159 (2000), we have a clear definition of what natural born citizenship is. Scales' father was an American serviceman stationed in the Philippines where he met Scales' mother. They married despite the fact that Scales' mother was pregnant with him at the time. In all probability, the court said, Scales was a product of his mother's previous relationship.

However, he was born after Mr. Scales married his mother, and he was treated as Scales' son. Later, Scales was facing deportation because of an aggravated felony involving drugs. He challenged his deportation saying he was a natural born citizen. The court determined that natural born citizenship depends on the statute in effect at the time of the child's birth.

Since Scales was born in 1977, he was a natural born citizen because a "person shall be a national and citizen of the United States at birth who is born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years."

Id. at 1169; see 8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(7) (1976). Therefore, Scales was a natural born citizen despite the following: having been born in a foreign country, having been born to a non-citizen, having his American father later deny paternity (and prove non-paternity), and having claimed to be a citizen of the Philippines. Sounds like it is difficult to get rid of natural born citizenship. Let's examine Barack Obama's citizenship.

I would first like to note that Scales v. INS, 232 F.3d 1159 (2000) is not exactly on point, as neither of Soetoro/Obama's parents were in the U.S. military; however, it does outline some of the issues we present.

Some more appropriate cases are United States of America v. Cervantes-Nava, 281 F.3d 501 (2002), Drozd v. I.N.S., 155 F.3d 81, 85-88 (2d Cir.1998), Solis-Espinoza v. Gonzales, 401 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2005). And, if Ms. Freeze would have read and retained what is in our briefs, she would have seen the laws we used.

We believe Soetoro/Obama was born in Kenya, contrary to Ms. Freeze's beliefs, and that Soetoro/Obama's mother was not old enough to confer U.S. "natural born" citizenship status to Soetoro/Obama.

Moreover, neither of Soetoro/Obama's parents were in the U.S. military at the time of Soetoro/Obama's birth, therefore her whole argument above, which was meant to mislead people and which is very ignorant for a law student, does not pertain.

Alan note: trying to show off her bias and to present "brilliant legal skills" (in her own mind) Ms. Freeze ends up, as the expression goes,  chewing shoe leather  of  the foot she pushed into her own mouth

Ms. Freeze also forgets to mention that the Nationality Act was revised in 1986 with a proviso regarding active military.

The only part of the code that was retroactive was the proviso regarding military status, nothing else.

But again, neither of Seotoro/Obama's parents were in the U.S. military.

Moreover, contrary to Scales, Soetoro/Obama's father admitted paternity, and the parents were married in Hawaii prior to Soetoro/Obama's birth.

Ms. Freeze has done nothing more than attempt to misapply the laws.

And once again, Ms. Freeze also fails to address the legal name of Soetoro/Obama or Soetoro/Obama's Indonesian citizenship.

Obama's citizenship will be determined under the 1952 version of the Immigration and Nationality Act since he was born in 1961 and the Act wasn't updated again until 1966. According to § 301(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (66 Stat. 235), "a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person [is a natural born citizen]."

According to § 305 of the same statute, any person born in Hawaii on or after April 30, 1900 was to be considered a natural born citizen. Obama's mother was a citizen of the United States, and his father was a citizen of Kenya. They were married six months before Obama was born. There is no doubt that Obama's mother resided in the United States or its possessions for at least one year prior to Obama's birth.

Therefore, Obama can't be anything other than a natural born citizen. Combine this detail with his birth in an American State, you have a certified natural born citizen.

Ms. Freeze's 1966 law fails and she completely contradicts herself.

The law that is applied is the law in effect at the time of the birth — in Soetoro/Obama's case, the Nationality Act of 1940, revised 1952. See Marquez-Marquez a/k/a Moreno v. Gonzales, 455 F. 3d 548 (5th Cir. 2006), Runnett v. Shultz, 901 F.2d 782, 783 (9th Cir.1990).

Law in 1966 does not apply, unless Ms. Freeze can show me where it states it is retroactive, which she CANNOT.

We are not disputing that Hawaii was a state, and we are not disputing that if in fact Soetoro/Obama was born in Hawaii, he would be a U.S. "natural born" citizen.

(Alan note: Other attorneys dispute this understanding of the law as the sole factor for natural born citizenship and introduce the nationality of the parents at the time of birth as a decisive factor) 

Further, Kenya is not an outlying possession of the U.S.

The law used by Ms. Freeze once again does not pertain to the issues outlined in our cases;

does not apply to Soetoro/Obama's birth in Kenya;

fails to address Soetoro/Obama's legal name;

and fails to address Soetoro/Obama's Indonesian citizenship.

Moreover, even if the 1966 version applied, which is does NOT, Soetoro/Obama's mother was not present residing in the U.S. for a continuous year prior to Soetoro/Obama's birth. We believe Soetoro/Obama's mother was residing in Kenya and in fact gave birth to Soetoro/Obama in Kenya.

Important issues left out by Ms. Freeze in attempt to confuse the reader is: 

the fact Soetoro/Obama became Barry Soetoro with an Indonesian Citizenship.

No records have been located legally changing Barry Soetoro's name back to Barack H. Obama.

No records have been located showing Soetoro/Obama relinquished his Indonesian citizenship, which was a requirement of Indonesia and outlined in their laws (Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship status) and reclaiming any U.S. citizenship status he may have once held.

Thus, Soetoro/Obama is still Barry Soetoro an Indonesian Citizen.

One last question I have for Ms. Freeze: If in fact Soetoro/Obama was a U.S. "natural born" citizen and eligible to serve as our United States President, why in the world would he spend in excess of a million dollars litigating these cases instead of just proving his citizenship status?

I'm curious to see how Ms. Freeze would respond. We know the answer, because Soetoro/Obama can't.

Source: http://obamacrimes.com/?p=340

Sunday, December 20, 2009


As a young teenager, Mosleh Zamani was arrested for having sex with his girlfriend and despite her desperate declarations she loved him and permitted him to do this, he was condemned to death for illegal sex under Islamic "sharia" (religious) law. Sharia law permits pedophilia (marriage of 9-year old girls) but not consensual sex between young adults, who are not married.

In Islamic Iran and other Moslem countries you can receive 80 severe lashes just for holding the arm of a girl, who is not your immediate relative like a sister, to help her across the diabolical traffic in many Middle Eastern cities. And frequently happens - with no good deed going unpunished.

In an open letter posted by dissenting students, they say this:

Dear Mosleh,

When you get to the "other side" (up there), for my sake and on my behalf give Allah a slap on the ear and tell him that from now on if he wants to create a religion, spend a bit more time so that the end result of your religion does not get dragged into such filth.

 How is it that when your prophet sleeps (has sex) with an 8-year old everyone claps and whistles applause for him and the seven heavens part into rays of light and the angels race to participate in this ceremony but when it comes to me, I get a hangman's noose (around my neck)?

What kind of a god are you who discriminates among your creations?.....(snip).... and takes away from me the only thing this provincial youth had - my smile (and my life).

How come you parted the seas for Moses but for our miserable populace you just stand by and watch?

If this is a description of god then what is a description for the devil!

صلح جان وقتی رسیدی به آن دنیا یک لطفی در حق من بکن و از طرف من یک سیلی به گوش خدا بزن. به او بگو، از این به بعد اگر خواستی دین صادر کنی کمی بیشتر وقت بگزار تا آخر و عاقبت دینت این جور به کثافت کشیده نشود. به او بگو چطور است که وقتی پیغمبرت با دختر 8 ساله می خوابد همه برایش کف و سوت می زنند، چیز هفت آسمان از نور جماعش پاره می شود و فرشتگان برای حضور در آن مراسم با هم کورس می گزارند ولی به من که می رسد پای طناب دار به میان می آید؟ اصلا تو چه جور خدایی هستی که بین مخلوقاتت فرق می گزاری؟ یکی را پیغمبر می کنی و جواز سپوختن هفت عالم را به او می دهی، یکی را شهرستانی بد بخت که همه چیزی که از دنیا دارد یک لبخند است؟ همان لبخندی که هیچ بی پدر مادر حرامزاده ای نتوانست از صورت مجید پاک کند...

چطور است برای موسی دریا جر می دهی ولی پای ملت بد بخت ما که می رسد فقط تماشا می کنی؟

اگر تعریف خدا بودن این است تعریف شیطان بودن چیست؟

Friday, December 11, 2009


December 10, 2009
Golnaz Esfandiari

Iranian oppositionists have launched a campaign in support of student Majid Tavakoli, who was arrested on Students Day on December 7 after giving a passionate speech during an antigovernment protest at Tehran’s Amir Kabir University.

Watch the speech here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lin9PWr55RU
The semi-official Fars news agency posted pictures of Tavakoli dressed as a woman http://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8809171089  after he reportedly tried to escape by disguising himself. Fars paired a picture of Tavakoli with one of Abol Hassan Bani Sadr, Iran’s first president after the 1979 revolution, who reportedly escaped in 1981 disguised as a woman. http://%20http//www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8809171089

In solidarity with Tavakoli, some Iranian men are taking pictures of themselves while wearing the Islamic hijab, which is compulsory for women in Iran, and posting the pictures on Facebook. (Check out the photos here. http://kouhestan.persianblog.ir/post/1774/
FULL ARTICLE click here

Tuesday, December 8, 2009


“Homosexuals must be killed…”


“ACT! interviews disciple of Islamist terrorist Sheikh Gilani”


“Intriguing insight into a dominant male theocracy where men are intimidating and threatening and where women are segregated, submissive, and subjugated.”


Sunday, December 6, 2009


Updates in the BARNETT v OBAMA case in Judge Carter's court:

Request for investigation of misconduct in legal proceedings, submission of perjured affidavits, submission of a letter to court by an attorney with improper purpose of covering up criminal activity and obstruction of justice, withholding evidence by attorneys, and US attorneys acting under conflict of interest

From 11.11.09. to 11.22.09, I had the honor to be a delegate at the Continental Congress 2009.

One of the guest speakers for the Continental Congress was a former Immigration officer and currently a private investigator in CO, Mr. John Samson. I have stated to Mr. Samson that I need to tie some loose ends and I was wondering if as a former immigration officer, Mr. Samson would be privy to the information, that other investigators couldn’t obtain.

In my presence Mr. Samson used his password and logged into the Database “Intelligator’, and he printed out a document attached as an exhibit. It shows that Mr. Obama’s immigration records show one more birthdate: 08.01.61 and in the area of Ethnic origin it stated Equatorial Guinea.

The rest of the information was the usual, showing Michelle Obama as the spouse and the rest of the information that we are used to see.

This document provides significance in a number of areas:

A. It shows that with the minimal inquiry assistant US attorneys representing Mr. Obama in this case knew or should have known, that not only there are 39 different social security numbers that he used according to the databases, none of which were issued in Hawaii, not only there are statements of forgery of his selective service certificate and certification of live birth and his refusal to unseal the (alleged) original birth certificate and original birthing file from the Kapiolani hospital, there are additional doubts to his citizenship, due to the presence of different date of birth and different origin.

This constitutes sufficient reason to doubt Mr. Obama’s citizenship status, where the US attorney’s office and department of justice representing United states of America had an obligation to withdraw from representation of Mr. Obama in this case and the fact that it was not done, represents a clear violation of the professional ethics by the US attorneys representing Mr. Obama in this case.

B. This piece of information provided another piece to the puzzle, as numerous articles have reported that some 500 Columbia university students from the same graduation year were questioned and didn’t remember Mr. Obama as a student at Columbia, however at the same time there was an article published in Seattle, Washington, regarding one, Roman Obama, an exchange student from Equatorial Guinea (same origin listed in Mr. Obama’s immigration records) studying in the university of Patrice Lumumba in Moscow.

(This university was known as a basis of heavy Communist indoctrination and rumored to be the hunting ground of communist recruiting by the KGB).

Alan Note: many of the senior clerics in Islamic Iran went to Lumumba University)

This university is very similar to the university of Karl Marx, attended by Mr. Obama’s cousin, current prime minister of Kenya Raela Odinga.

C. It provided yet another connection between Mr. Obama and the law clerk of this court Mr. Velamoor, as similarly there are conflicting accounts of Mr. Velamoor’s legal education in Martindale and WestLaw directories: one pointing to Columbia university, while the other to the Comenis law school in Bratislava, Slovakia.

It appears that both might have been part of the same program with the Columbia university.

Additionally there is a geographical connection as both Mr. Obama and Mr. Velamoor came from the same tiny community of Mercer Island WA. While Mr. Obama in his memoirs writes that his mother was married to Mr. Obama Sr. and lived in Hawaii in and around his birth, the registrar records show that she dropped out of the university of Hawaii around December 1960 and reappeared some nine months later enrolled in the university of Washington from August 1961, shortly after Mr. Obama’s birth.

This coupled with the fact that Mr. Velamoor is still listed as an employee of Perkins Coie, the law firm, representing Mr. Obama in eligibility litigation, shows that there had been some ethics violation and Mr. Velamoor had to disclose all of the connections and conflict of interest and had to be recused from assisting your owner.

BARNETT v OBAMA - Letter to Judge Carter - Main Document

BARNETT v OBAMA - Exhibit Barack Obama Background Report

Had Americans been able to stop obsessing over the color of Barack Obama's skin and instead paid more attention to his cultural identity, maybe he would not be in the White House today. The key to understanding him lies with his identification with his father, and his adoption of a cultural and political mindset rooted in postcolonial Africa.

Like many educated intellectuals in postcolonial Africa, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was enraged at the transformation of his native land by its colonial conqueror. But instead of embracing the traditional values of his own tribal cultural past, he embraced an imported Western ideology, Marxism.

I call such frustrated and angry modern Africans who embrace various foreign "isms", instead of looking homeward for repair of societies that are broken, African Colonials. They are Africans who serve foreign ideas.

Equatorial Guinea

IN DEPTH BACKGROUND REVUE with excellent comments - CLICK HERE