Once past the astonishment of this "prediction" or report (?), some of the content has tinges of interesting fact. Such as the origins and affiliation of the Secretary of Commerce. This, rather than the conspiratorial content, encouraged posting this.
Does this theory of transfer/seizure of power (attributed to the far right) actually indicate total power being granted to the Chinese Secretary of Commerce to transfer technology to China without consulting the Obama House?
For instance the mention of sending of troops abroad to protect Russian citizens points to sending forces into Islamic Iran, where some 50,000 Russian consultants populate almost very government office and NGO's (non-government organizations and has been along standing consideration when analyzing Russian presence inside Islamic Iran.
PRESENTED HERE AS A VERY UNUSUAL VIEWPOINT often published by or refering to Pravda articles. The link below has many other seemingly off the wall analyses that are hard to swallow let alone digest, but..... often interesting in the extent of imagination required to configure these into articles.
The acrid "smoke" which might make your eyes tear emanates from some invisible fires. Either pure fantasy or misunderstanding of actual facts in the writer's mind and very creatively offered.
Search for the nuggets rather than the broader picture painted.
Have fun.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1292.htm
October 28, 2009
Putin Given Shocking Report Saying Obama “Ousted” In Right-Wing US Coup
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
Shocking reports circulating in the Kremlin today are stating that Prime Minister Putin’s refusal to agree to new talks with the United States on the START 1 Nuclear Arms Control Treaty, Russian National Security Council Head Nikolai Patrushev’s warning that the Motherlands “military must prepare for a large-scale conflict” and the State Duma’s unanimous vote to allow Russian troops to go “abroad to prevent aggression by other states and to protect Russian citizens on foreign soil”, are all due to a GRU report stating that the American President, Barack Obama, has been made to “surrender his power” to the Right-Wing fascist forces who now, for all intent and purposes, are steering the US towards Total Global War.
According to these reports, in the ‘fractious’ White House meeting held between Obama and his top US Military Commanders in late September (and as we had previously reported on in our October 2nd report “Obama In Secret Russia Visit Warns Putin, “I May Not Make It”) the American President was forced to sign away a strategic portion of his power, and as we can read as posted by the United States Federal Register:
NOTICE: ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS
DOCID: fr02oc09-83
[[Page 50913]]
Presidential Determination No. 2009-31 of September 29, 2009
Presidential Determination On the Delegation of Certifications Under Section 1512 of Public Law 105-261 Memorandum for the Secretary of Commerce
By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of Title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to you the functions of the President under section 1512 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (NDAA). In the performance of your responsibility under this memorandum, you shall consult, as appropriate, the heads of other executive departments and agencies. You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal Register.
(Presidential Sig.)
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, September 29, 2009
[FR Doc. E9-23917
Filed 10-1-09; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3510-BP-P
Important to note about Obama’s signing away his power is that it is authorized under US Code Title 3 Section 301 which states:
The President of the United States is authorized to designate and empower the head of any department or agency in the executive branch, or any official thereof who is required to be appointed by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to perform without approval, ratification, or other action by the President
(1) any function which is vested in the President by law, or
(2) any function which such officer is required or authorized by law to perform only with or subject to the approval, ratification, or other action of the President: Provided, That nothing contained herein shall relieve the President of his responsibility in office for the acts of any such head or other official designated by him to perform such functions. Such designation and authorization shall be in writing, shall be published in the Federal Register, shall be subject to such terms, conditions, and limitations as the President may deem advisable, and shall be revocable at any time by the President in whole or in part.
To the specific power Obama was forced to relinquish to the right-wing fascist coup plotters we can further read from Section 1512 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999, and which says:
SEC. 1512. CERTIFICATION OF EXPORTS OF MISSILE EQUIPMENT OR TECHNOLOGY TO CHINA.
The President shall certify to the Congress at least 15 days in advance of any export to the People's Republic of China of missile equipment or technology (as defined in section 74 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2797c)) that--
(1) such export is not detrimental to the United States space launch industry; and
(2) the missile equipment or technology, including any indirect technical benefit that could be derived from such export, will not measurably improve the missile or space launch capabilities of the People's Republic of China.
To the greatest alarm caused in Russia by Obama’s being forced to give up this power is the man to whom he has given it to, and who, according to FSB files, is one of Communist China’s most deeply embedded spies in the United States and is the Americans current Secretary of Commerce, the first Chinese-American ever to hold a US governors office, former top China lobbyist, and longtime Clinton family “conduit” to Communist China, Gary (Lok Gaa-Fai) Locke (photo 2nd left with Chinese Communist Leader President Hu Jintao)
Not being told to the American people about Secretary Locke is his longstanding ties with the Chinese Communists funneling money to the US Democratic Party under the regime of former President Clinton and his wife, now US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton orchestrated by master China spy and former US deputy assistant secretary for International economic affairs under Clinton John Huang through the Lippo Bank in California and the Worthen Bank in Arkansas.
As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has now declared that improving the United States ties with China is now her “personal mission”, these reports continue, Obama’s signing over of his power to Americas most strategic military secrets to Communist China through Secretary Locke “proves beyond all doubt” that the US has acquiesced to the Chinese who are expected in the next moves of the Great Game to strike the Motherland in a grab to gain for themselves the vast mineral, timber and fishery wealth of Siberia, the last such resources remaining in the World today.
[Note: Siberia makes up about 77% of Russia's territory (13.1 million square kilometres), but only 25% of Russia's population and holds some of the World's largest deposits of nickel, gold, lead, coal, molybdenum, gypsum, diamonds, silver and zinc, as well as extensive unexploited resources of oil and natural gas and whose Sea of Okhotsk is one of the two or three richest fisheries on the Planet.]
Being forgotten by these duplicitous and arrogant right-wing fascists now controlling America is that the Motherland is more than able to defend itself against them, including such notable figures as White House Communication Director Anita Dunn who was recently video taped praising the former brutal Chinese Communist Dictator Mao Tse-tung as one of her “favorite political philosophers”.
And for those sleeping Americans soon to be awakened to the catastrophic horrors of what their “leaders” have in store for them through there new alliance with the satanic Chinese Communists they should, and sooner rather than later, remember the words of Chairman Mao, who aside from correctly calling the United States a “paper tiger”, gave this advice to all of his followers: “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”
Whose guns will win the battle for the United States, their sleeping Patriots, or their overlord masters, it is not to our knowing….only that the battle is coming soon.
© October 28, 2009 EU and US all rights reserved
Are You Ready? You’d Better Be!
While You Were Sleeping…
[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth. Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Saturday, October 24, 2009
OBA-HUSSEIN TELLS CONGRESS HE DOES NOT NEED THEM - CAN RULE BY DECREE
Alan note: FALSE EMERGENCY DECLARED TO TEST RUN OBA-HUSSEIN POWER GRAB & SOCIAL CONTROL?
1,000 SWINE 'FLU DEATHS DECLARED AN EMERGENCY!
AVERAGE OF 30,000 'FLU DEATHS A YEAR NO WORRIES! NOT TO BE COMPARED WHEN OBA-HUSSEIN WANTS TO CREATE A CRISIS TO DIVERT US FROM HIS FRAUDULENT HEALTH CARE PLANS.
DESPITE ADVANCE INDICATORS, CRITICAL SHORTAGE OF VACCINE ANOTHER INDICATOR OF HOW BADLY A GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTHCARE WILL IMPACT OUR COUNTRY.
WE APPARENTLY ONLY HAVE 25% OF OUR NEEDS! ONE MANUFACTURER WILL NOT HAVE SUPPLIES READY TILL 2010.
More information is available from the NYT on those "extraordinary powers" being spread around by Obama. First, the actual Proclamation has not been released on the WH website. In the "Source doc" post earlier today, we learned the following:
Page 15: When declaring a national emergency, the President must indicate, according to Title III, the powers and authorities being activated to respond to the exigency at hand. Certain presidential accountability and reporting requirements regarding national emergency declarations were specified in Title IV, and the repeal and continuation of various statutory provisions delegating emergency powers was accomplished in Title V.
It sure would be nice if the Administration would act with more transparency so we could see what powers Obama has doled out to unelected officials.
We can get some clues from the NYT piece:
The declaration that Obama signed late Friday means Health and Human Services chief Kathleen Sebelius to bypass federal rules when opening alternative care sites, such as offsite hospital centers at schools or community centers, if needed.
"Alternative care sites" could include - prove me wrong - modern-day leper colonies.
Hospitals could modify patient rules -- for example, requiring them to give less information during a hectic time -- to quicken access to treatment, with government approval.
This is silly. When I went to the ER a couple of years ago, all they wanted was my name so they could pull up my medical records. When I offered my insurance card, I was told they could not take it until after they were assured that I was stable. "Less information" means that they won't pull my medical records before treating me?
The declaration, which the White House announced Saturday, allows HHS in some cases to let hospitals relocate emergency rooms offsite to reduce flu-related burdens and to protect noninfected patients.
Op cit., "leper colony."
And now for the chilling conclusion:
It was the second of two steps needed to give Sebelius extraordinary powers during a crisis.
Now she has all the authority she needs? Why is that not comforting?
Let's add another layer (no, I do not trust this putz). The President is required to transmit immediately the declaration to the Federal Register ("Such proclamation shall immediately be transmitted to the Congress and published in the Federal Register"). Unfortunately, he did it AFTER the publication deadline for Friday, and it is not published on the weekends. No, we haven't heard anything out of Congress, either.
Here is why we want to see the Proclamation:
When the President declares a national emergency, no powers or authorities made available by statute for use in the event of an emergency shall be exercised unless and until the President specifies the provisions of law under which he proposes that he, or other officers will act. Such specification may be made either in the declaration of a national emergency, or by one or more contemporaneous or subsequent Executive orders published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. (Emphasis added.)
Interesting side note - it suggests that an Executive Order is required. Have previous emergencies been declared by Proclamation?
The issue here is that Obama has engendered no trust whatsoever, so him declaring a national emergency when the swine flu has been called mild by some, much less prevalent than feared by others leads it to be a questionable act. Yes, 1,000 people have died - that's tragic. Yes, it seems to be concentrated in young people - even more tragic. But how many people die from the seasonal flu? About 30,000 each year.
Alan note: but 65% are the elderly, old codgers, so should die according to some Administration senior advisors setting policy.
This action suggests the same level of over reaction as calling a joint session of Congress for a political issue.
patriotroom.com
1,000 SWINE 'FLU DEATHS DECLARED AN EMERGENCY!
AVERAGE OF 30,000 'FLU DEATHS A YEAR NO WORRIES! NOT TO BE COMPARED WHEN OBA-HUSSEIN WANTS TO CREATE A CRISIS TO DIVERT US FROM HIS FRAUDULENT HEALTH CARE PLANS.
DESPITE ADVANCE INDICATORS, CRITICAL SHORTAGE OF VACCINE ANOTHER INDICATOR OF HOW BADLY A GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTHCARE WILL IMPACT OUR COUNTRY.
WE APPARENTLY ONLY HAVE 25% OF OUR NEEDS! ONE MANUFACTURER WILL NOT HAVE SUPPLIES READY TILL 2010.
=======================
More information is available from the NYT on those "extraordinary powers" being spread around by Obama. First, the actual Proclamation has not been released on the WH website. In the "Source doc" post earlier today, we learned the following:
Page 15: When declaring a national emergency, the President must indicate, according to Title III, the powers and authorities being activated to respond to the exigency at hand. Certain presidential accountability and reporting requirements regarding national emergency declarations were specified in Title IV, and the repeal and continuation of various statutory provisions delegating emergency powers was accomplished in Title V.
It sure would be nice if the Administration would act with more transparency so we could see what powers Obama has doled out to unelected officials.
We can get some clues from the NYT piece:
The declaration that Obama signed late Friday means Health and Human Services chief Kathleen Sebelius to bypass federal rules when opening alternative care sites, such as offsite hospital centers at schools or community centers, if needed.
"Alternative care sites" could include - prove me wrong - modern-day leper colonies.
Hospitals could modify patient rules -- for example, requiring them to give less information during a hectic time -- to quicken access to treatment, with government approval.
This is silly. When I went to the ER a couple of years ago, all they wanted was my name so they could pull up my medical records. When I offered my insurance card, I was told they could not take it until after they were assured that I was stable. "Less information" means that they won't pull my medical records before treating me?
The declaration, which the White House announced Saturday, allows HHS in some cases to let hospitals relocate emergency rooms offsite to reduce flu-related burdens and to protect noninfected patients.
Op cit., "leper colony."
And now for the chilling conclusion:
It was the second of two steps needed to give Sebelius extraordinary powers during a crisis.
Now she has all the authority she needs? Why is that not comforting?
Let's add another layer (no, I do not trust this putz). The President is required to transmit immediately the declaration to the Federal Register ("Such proclamation shall immediately be transmitted to the Congress and published in the Federal Register"). Unfortunately, he did it AFTER the publication deadline for Friday, and it is not published on the weekends. No, we haven't heard anything out of Congress, either.
Here is why we want to see the Proclamation:
When the President declares a national emergency, no powers or authorities made available by statute for use in the event of an emergency shall be exercised unless and until the President specifies the provisions of law under which he proposes that he, or other officers will act. Such specification may be made either in the declaration of a national emergency, or by one or more contemporaneous or subsequent Executive orders published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. (Emphasis added.)
Interesting side note - it suggests that an Executive Order is required. Have previous emergencies been declared by Proclamation?
The issue here is that Obama has engendered no trust whatsoever, so him declaring a national emergency when the swine flu has been called mild by some, much less prevalent than feared by others leads it to be a questionable act. Yes, 1,000 people have died - that's tragic. Yes, it seems to be concentrated in young people - even more tragic. But how many people die from the seasonal flu? About 30,000 each year.
Alan note: but 65% are the elderly, old codgers, so should die according to some Administration senior advisors setting policy.
This action suggests the same level of over reaction as calling a joint session of Congress for a political issue.
patriotroom.com
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
VOTE THE SCUM OUT! ALL OF THEM. RECLAIM AMERICA.
The entire Congress of the United States is corrupt. And I mean both Houses and I mean both major parties.
I realize that a few Members of each House are Independents
and at least one is a declared Socialist but, as a group of people, they are absolutely the most corrupt bunch to ever disgrace our Nation.
In November of 2010 the entire House of Representatives
will have to stand for re-election; all 435 of them.
One third of the Senate, a total of 33 of them, will also
stand for re-election. Vote every incumbent out.
And I mean every one of them. No matter their Party
affiliation. Let's start all over in the House of Representatives
with 435 people who have absolutely no experience in running
that body, with no political favors owed to anyone but their own constituents. Let's make them understand that they work for us.
They are answerable to us and they simply have to run that body with some common sense..
Two years later, in 2012, vote the next third of the
incumbents in the Senate out. You'll know who they are because their names will be on the ballot and, in most cases, will be shown as the Incumbent.
If you don't know who your Senators are, (there are only two for each State) find out. And then vote them out, too!
We can do the same thing in 2014 and, by that time we will
have put all new people in that body as well.
We, the People, have got to take this Country back and we
HAVE to do it peacefully. That's what the Framers of our Constitution envisioned.
Please, if you love this Country, send this (as I have done) to absolutely everyone whose email address appears in your address book.
This thing can permeate this Country in no time. Let's make it happen..
VOTE THE BUMS OUT. LET'S TAKE AMERICA BACK! IF YOU LIKE THE WAY THINGS ARE GOING IN OUR COUNTRY, THEN DO NOTHING..
I realize that a few Members of each House are Independents
and at least one is a declared Socialist but, as a group of people, they are absolutely the most corrupt bunch to ever disgrace our Nation.
In November of 2010 the entire House of Representatives
will have to stand for re-election; all 435 of them.
One third of the Senate, a total of 33 of them, will also
stand for re-election. Vote every incumbent out.
And I mean every one of them. No matter their Party
affiliation. Let's start all over in the House of Representatives
with 435 people who have absolutely no experience in running
that body, with no political favors owed to anyone but their own constituents. Let's make them understand that they work for us.
They are answerable to us and they simply have to run that body with some common sense..
Two years later, in 2012, vote the next third of the
incumbents in the Senate out. You'll know who they are because their names will be on the ballot and, in most cases, will be shown as the Incumbent.
If you don't know who your Senators are, (there are only two for each State) find out. And then vote them out, too!
We can do the same thing in 2014 and, by that time we will
have put all new people in that body as well.
We, the People, have got to take this Country back and we
HAVE to do it peacefully. That's what the Framers of our Constitution envisioned.
Please, if you love this Country, send this (as I have done) to absolutely everyone whose email address appears in your address book.
This thing can permeate this Country in no time. Let's make it happen..
VOTE THE BUMS OUT. LET'S TAKE AMERICA BACK! IF YOU LIKE THE WAY THINGS ARE GOING IN OUR COUNTRY, THEN DO NOTHING..
Saturday, October 17, 2009
OBAMA BOWS TO IRANIAN DEMANDS
Obama Cuts Pro-Democracy Funds for Iran
Newsmax.com
Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:34 PM
By: Kenneth R. Timmerman
The Obama administration has cut funding for pro-democracy and human rights programs in Iran, reversing years of efforts during the Bush administration to help develop a civil society, congressional sources told Newsmax this week.
The move is apparently intended to please Iran’s rulers after they criticized President Obama and the State Department for allegedly seeking to fund a “velvet revolution” during the June presidential elections in Iran.
“It sounds like the Iranians complained in Geneva and we acceded to their demands,” a former senior government official familiar with the pro-democracy programs told Newsmax.
“It’s shameful,” he added. “This sends a clear message to Tehran that we are empowering the Iranian regime to be obstinate and fight us."
Read the full story here:
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_iran_human_rights/2009/10/14/272402.html
Find about about Ken Timmerman’s latest book, Honor Killing:
Www.kentimmerman.com/honor-killing.html
--
Kenneth R. Timmerman
Contributing editor: Newsmax.com
Tel: 301-946-2918
Reply to: timmerman.road@verizon.net
Archive: www.newsmax.com/timmerman/
Newsmax.com
Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:34 PM
By: Kenneth R. Timmerman
The Obama administration has cut funding for pro-democracy and human rights programs in Iran, reversing years of efforts during the Bush administration to help develop a civil society, congressional sources told Newsmax this week.
The move is apparently intended to please Iran’s rulers after they criticized President Obama and the State Department for allegedly seeking to fund a “velvet revolution” during the June presidential elections in Iran.
“It sounds like the Iranians complained in Geneva and we acceded to their demands,” a former senior government official familiar with the pro-democracy programs told Newsmax.
“It’s shameful,” he added. “This sends a clear message to Tehran that we are empowering the Iranian regime to be obstinate and fight us."
Read the full story here:
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_iran_human_rights/2009/10/14/272402.html
Find about about Ken Timmerman’s latest book, Honor Killing:
Www.kentimmerman.com/honor-killing.html
--
Kenneth R. Timmerman
Contributing editor: Newsmax.com
Tel: 301-946-2918
Reply to: timmerman.road@verizon.net
Archive: www.newsmax.com/timmerman/
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Tennessee School Principal Jody McLoud SPEAKS OUT
Tennessee High School Principal's Remarks About Prayer at a Football Game-Truth!
Summary of eRumor:
This email is about Jody McCloud who is principal at the Roane County High School in Kingston, Tennessee.
In September, 2000, he opened a football game by saying that normally there would have been a prayer, but a Supreme Court decision had ended that...so he read a statement commenting on that and inviting people to pray anyway.
The Truth:
The story is true. TruthOrFiction.com has confirmed both the event and the text of McCloud's statement. McCloud has gotten response and requests for copies from all over the country.
A real example of the story as it has been circulated:
"This is a statement that was read over the PA system at the football game at Roane County High School, Kingston, Tennessee by school Principal Jody McLoud, on September 1, 2000.
I thought it was worth sharing with the world, and hope you will forward it to all your friends. It clearly shows just how far this country has gone in the wrong direction.
"It has always been the custom at Roane County High School football games to say a prayer and play the National Anthem to honor God and Country. Due to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court, I am told that saying a prayer is a violation of Federal Case Law.
As I understand the law at this time, I can use this public facility to approve of sexual perversion and call it an alternate lifestyle, and if someone is offended, that's OK.
I can use it to condone sexual promiscuity by dispensing condoms and calling it safe sex. If someone is offended, that's OK.
I can even use this public facility to present the merits of killing an unborn baby as a viable means of birth control.
If someone is offended, no problem.
I can designate a school day as earth day and involve students in activities to religiously worship and praise the goddess, mother earth, and call it ecology.
I can use literature, videos and presentations in the classroom that depict people with strong, traditional, Christian convictions as simple minded and ignorant and call it enlightenment.
However, if anyone uses this facility to honor God and ask Him to bless this event with safety and good sportsmanship, Federal Case Law is violated.
This appears to be at best, inconsistent and at worst, diabolical. Apparently, we are to be tolerant of everything and anyone except God and His Commandments.
Nevertheless, as a school principal, I frequently ask staff and students to abide by rules which they do not necessarily agree. For me to do otherwise would be at best, inconsistent and at worst, hypocritical. I suffer from that affliction enough unintentionally. I certainly do not need to add an intentional transgression.
For this reason, I shall, "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's," and refrain from praying at this time.
However, if you feel inspired to honor, praise and thank God, and ask Him in the name of Jesus to bless this event, please feel free to do so. As far as I know, that's not against the law----yet."
Summary of eRumor:
This email is about Jody McCloud who is principal at the Roane County High School in Kingston, Tennessee.
In September, 2000, he opened a football game by saying that normally there would have been a prayer, but a Supreme Court decision had ended that...so he read a statement commenting on that and inviting people to pray anyway.
The Truth:
The story is true. TruthOrFiction.com has confirmed both the event and the text of McCloud's statement. McCloud has gotten response and requests for copies from all over the country.
A real example of the story as it has been circulated:
"This is a statement that was read over the PA system at the football game at Roane County High School, Kingston, Tennessee by school Principal Jody McLoud, on September 1, 2000.
I thought it was worth sharing with the world, and hope you will forward it to all your friends. It clearly shows just how far this country has gone in the wrong direction.
"It has always been the custom at Roane County High School football games to say a prayer and play the National Anthem to honor God and Country. Due to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court, I am told that saying a prayer is a violation of Federal Case Law.
As I understand the law at this time, I can use this public facility to approve of sexual perversion and call it an alternate lifestyle, and if someone is offended, that's OK.
I can use it to condone sexual promiscuity by dispensing condoms and calling it safe sex. If someone is offended, that's OK.
I can even use this public facility to present the merits of killing an unborn baby as a viable means of birth control.
If someone is offended, no problem.
I can designate a school day as earth day and involve students in activities to religiously worship and praise the goddess, mother earth, and call it ecology.
I can use literature, videos and presentations in the classroom that depict people with strong, traditional, Christian convictions as simple minded and ignorant and call it enlightenment.
However, if anyone uses this facility to honor God and ask Him to bless this event with safety and good sportsmanship, Federal Case Law is violated.
This appears to be at best, inconsistent and at worst, diabolical. Apparently, we are to be tolerant of everything and anyone except God and His Commandments.
Nevertheless, as a school principal, I frequently ask staff and students to abide by rules which they do not necessarily agree. For me to do otherwise would be at best, inconsistent and at worst, hypocritical. I suffer from that affliction enough unintentionally. I certainly do not need to add an intentional transgression.
For this reason, I shall, "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's," and refrain from praying at this time.
However, if you feel inspired to honor, praise and thank God, and ask Him in the name of Jesus to bless this event, please feel free to do so. As far as I know, that's not against the law----yet."
Monday, October 12, 2009
IT'S FORK, IT'S A SPOON, IT'S A WEAPON!
Our educators are dumber than those they are trying to teach. Have you noticed how they pick on/tramatize the really good, polite students?
MUST read the comments at the site you reach when you click on the title of this post.
Obama schools demand blind obedience not logic. Logic would defeat his forced Marxist-Gay inculcation of our children
MUST read the comments at the site you reach when you click on the title of this post.
Obama schools demand blind obedience not logic. Logic would defeat his forced Marxist-Gay inculcation of our children
Thursday, October 8, 2009
KEVIN JENNINGS WAS A NAMBLA SUPPORTER? REPORTEDLY, YES..
NAMBLA is a group which encourages and facilitates homosexual activity with children.
Is Obama sending “safe sex schools czar Jennings" to teach about the benefits of underage sex with “older men” they might meet in “publc bathrooms” at the schools his daughters attend?
Obama Administration Condones Sex With Minors
Red State | Sept 29, 2009 | Erick Erickson
Statutory rape? Who cares what goes on between a 15 year old and the man who picked him up in a bus station bathroom. You prude. People with low IQ got to see Whoopee Goldberg defend Roman Polanski on the View yesterday. Whoopee had no problem with the man filling a thirteen year old girl with alcohol and drugs before raping having sex with her. I say “people with low IQ” because demographically those are the only people who watch the View save for those few people forced to watch the show as part of their job.
In any event, Goldberg’s blasé attitude about raping having sex with drug filled children and the implications of statutory rape has spilled over into the Obama administration, which is taking the position that statutory rape is of no great consequence and should, if the child consents, be encouraged.
There is no other way to look at Barack Obama’s appointment of Kevin Jennings, the President’s “safe schools czar” who, the Washington Times reports unapologetically encouraged a homosexual relationship between a fifteen year old boy and much older man who, the boy reported to Jennings, picked the boy up in a bus station bathroom and promptly took the boy home.
Considering Jennings wrote about this in his one and only published book and spoke about this prior to his appointment, we can only assume the Obama administration knew about it and has no problem with it.
According to Mr. Jennings’ own description in a new audiotape discovered by Fox News, the 15-year-old boy met the “older man” in a “bus station bathroom” and was taken to the older man’s home that night. When some details about the case became public, Mr. Jennings threatened to sue another teacher who called his failure to report the statutory rape “unethical.”
Jennings’ defenders have claimed he did not know sex was taking place, which is akin to Roman Polanski saying he did not know his victim was underage despite having to get the written consent of the girl’s mother for the photo shoot that fateful night.
Despite the defenders’ defenses, a new audiotape has Jennings bragging about fostering the relationship between the fifteen year old boy and the bus station bathroom man. Jennings bragged that he told the boy “to use a condom,” which suggests Jennings would rather be the “safe sex schools czar.” Jennings shows no remorse. He delights in encouraging the relationship. And Barack Obama delights in hiring Jennings and shows no remorse either.
At some point we must stop saying that there was a failure to vet these people and conclude that Barack Obama has no more of a problem with men like Kevin Jennings who encourage statutory rape than men like Bill Ayers who encourages cop killing.
COMMENT
There’s no doubt in my mind he’s had sex with underage boys - and he probably still does. Unless someone comes forward, nothing’s going to happen to this pervert.
Even then, he’ll quietly resign while emperor zero feigns shock and disappointment - with his given pass from the Mass Media.
Does this lend credibility to the accusations of homosexual encounters Obama had with a limo driver? Apparently abused sexually by elder men himself as a youth, Obama appears to thus condone such acts or is wreaking yet another revenge on the Americans for what happened to him by making this happen to our school children.
READ MORE ON WHAT JENNINGS ESPOUSES AND PROBABLY STILL PRACTISES
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/fistgate/index.html
AND ANOTHER LOOK AT WHAT IT'S ABOUT
(Caution: extremely gross and disgusting. We debated posting this in unedited form; we did so because it was given to schoolchildren in a public school, written with public money. Unfortunately, it's necessary that the public see it.)
"The Little Black Book - Queer in the 21st Century"
Is this the future? This booklet was distributed to hundreds of kids (middle school age and up) at Brookline High School, Brookline, MA, on April 30, 2005. It was written by the Boston-based AIDS Action Committee, with help with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the Boston Public Health Commission.
The event that day was designed for children and their teachers across Massachusetts, organized by the "Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network" (GLSEN). This is the group that runs "Gay-Straight Alliance" clubs in public schools across the country. You must ask yourself: What kind of person would write this? What kind of person would give it to kids? Where is this movement headed?
full report of event, including photos, news reports, Governor's statement, and more.
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/black_book/black_book_inside.html
Is Obama sending “safe sex schools czar Jennings" to teach about the benefits of underage sex with “older men” they might meet in “publc bathrooms” at the schools his daughters attend?
Obama Administration Condones Sex With Minors
Red State | Sept 29, 2009 | Erick Erickson
Statutory rape? Who cares what goes on between a 15 year old and the man who picked him up in a bus station bathroom. You prude. People with low IQ got to see Whoopee Goldberg defend Roman Polanski on the View yesterday. Whoopee had no problem with the man filling a thirteen year old girl with alcohol and drugs before raping having sex with her. I say “people with low IQ” because demographically those are the only people who watch the View save for those few people forced to watch the show as part of their job.
In any event, Goldberg’s blasé attitude about raping having sex with drug filled children and the implications of statutory rape has spilled over into the Obama administration, which is taking the position that statutory rape is of no great consequence and should, if the child consents, be encouraged.
There is no other way to look at Barack Obama’s appointment of Kevin Jennings, the President’s “safe schools czar” who, the Washington Times reports unapologetically encouraged a homosexual relationship between a fifteen year old boy and much older man who, the boy reported to Jennings, picked the boy up in a bus station bathroom and promptly took the boy home.
Considering Jennings wrote about this in his one and only published book and spoke about this prior to his appointment, we can only assume the Obama administration knew about it and has no problem with it.
According to Mr. Jennings’ own description in a new audiotape discovered by Fox News, the 15-year-old boy met the “older man” in a “bus station bathroom” and was taken to the older man’s home that night. When some details about the case became public, Mr. Jennings threatened to sue another teacher who called his failure to report the statutory rape “unethical.”
Jennings’ defenders have claimed he did not know sex was taking place, which is akin to Roman Polanski saying he did not know his victim was underage despite having to get the written consent of the girl’s mother for the photo shoot that fateful night.
Despite the defenders’ defenses, a new audiotape has Jennings bragging about fostering the relationship between the fifteen year old boy and the bus station bathroom man. Jennings bragged that he told the boy “to use a condom,” which suggests Jennings would rather be the “safe sex schools czar.” Jennings shows no remorse. He delights in encouraging the relationship. And Barack Obama delights in hiring Jennings and shows no remorse either.
At some point we must stop saying that there was a failure to vet these people and conclude that Barack Obama has no more of a problem with men like Kevin Jennings who encourage statutory rape than men like Bill Ayers who encourages cop killing.
COMMENT
There’s no doubt in my mind he’s had sex with underage boys - and he probably still does. Unless someone comes forward, nothing’s going to happen to this pervert.
Even then, he’ll quietly resign while emperor zero feigns shock and disappointment - with his given pass from the Mass Media.
Does this lend credibility to the accusations of homosexual encounters Obama had with a limo driver? Apparently abused sexually by elder men himself as a youth, Obama appears to thus condone such acts or is wreaking yet another revenge on the Americans for what happened to him by making this happen to our school children.
READ MORE ON WHAT JENNINGS ESPOUSES AND PROBABLY STILL PRACTISES
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/fistgate/index.html
AND ANOTHER LOOK AT WHAT IT'S ABOUT
(Caution: extremely gross and disgusting. We debated posting this in unedited form; we did so because it was given to schoolchildren in a public school, written with public money. Unfortunately, it's necessary that the public see it.)
"The Little Black Book - Queer in the 21st Century"
Is this the future? This booklet was distributed to hundreds of kids (middle school age and up) at Brookline High School, Brookline, MA, on April 30, 2005. It was written by the Boston-based AIDS Action Committee, with help with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the Boston Public Health Commission.
The event that day was designed for children and their teachers across Massachusetts, organized by the "Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network" (GLSEN). This is the group that runs "Gay-Straight Alliance" clubs in public schools across the country. You must ask yourself: What kind of person would write this? What kind of person would give it to kids? Where is this movement headed?
full report of event, including photos, news reports, Governor's statement, and more.
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/black_book/black_book_inside.html
Monday, October 5, 2009
Some D@mn Fine Obama Jokes...
October 5, 2009 | Unknown
- Q: What's the main problem with Barack Obama jokes?
A: His followers don't think they're funny and everyone else doesn't think they're jokes.
- Q: Why does Barack Obama oppose the Second Amendment?
A: It stands between him and the First.
- Q: What's the difference between Rahm Emanuel and a carp?
A: One is a scum sucking bottom feeder and the other is a fish.
- Q: What's the difference between Greta Van Susteren and Barack Obama?
A: Greta only talks out of one side of her mouth.
- Q: What does Barack Obama call lunch with a convicted felon?
A: A fund raiser.
- Q: What's the difference between Obama's cabinet and a penitentiary?
A: One’s full of tax evaders, blackmailers and threats to society. The other is for prisoners.
- Q: What's the difference between a large pizza and the typical Obama backer?
A: The pizza can feed a family of four.
- Q: What's the difference between Simba and Obama?
A: Simba is an African lion while Obama is a lyin' African.
- Q: If Pelosi and Obama were in a boat and it started to sink, who would be saved?
A: America!!
- Barack Obama: He has what it takes, to take what you've got!
- Barack Obama's campaign slogan, "Yes we can" has become, "Yes you will!"
- No one wants to see GM’s new convertible, the Pelosi, with its top down!
- The liberals have asked us to give Obama time. Would...25 to life be appropriate
- Q: What's the main problem with Barack Obama jokes?
A: His followers don't think they're funny and everyone else doesn't think they're jokes.
- Q: Why does Barack Obama oppose the Second Amendment?
A: It stands between him and the First.
- Q: What's the difference between Rahm Emanuel and a carp?
A: One is a scum sucking bottom feeder and the other is a fish.
- Q: What's the difference between Greta Van Susteren and Barack Obama?
A: Greta only talks out of one side of her mouth.
- Q: What does Barack Obama call lunch with a convicted felon?
A: A fund raiser.
- Q: What's the difference between Obama's cabinet and a penitentiary?
A: One’s full of tax evaders, blackmailers and threats to society. The other is for prisoners.
- Q: What's the difference between a large pizza and the typical Obama backer?
A: The pizza can feed a family of four.
- Q: What's the difference between Simba and Obama?
A: Simba is an African lion while Obama is a lyin' African.
- Q: If Pelosi and Obama were in a boat and it started to sink, who would be saved?
A: America!!
- Barack Obama: He has what it takes, to take what you've got!
- Barack Obama's campaign slogan, "Yes we can" has become, "Yes you will!"
- No one wants to see GM’s new convertible, the Pelosi, with its top down!
- The liberals have asked us to give Obama time. Would...25 to life be appropriate
Friday, October 2, 2009
HOW SENATE PLANS TO PASS HEALTHCARE BILL BY SNEAKY MAJORITY VOTE
DOCTOR'S ORDERS
WorldNetDaily
Analyst: Democrat trickery to force Obamacare
Suggests maneuver will allow simple majority vote on health-industry takeover
Posted: October 01, 2009
6:01 PM Eastern
WorldNetDaily
An analyst whose responsibilities include working with members of the U.S. Senate for The Heritage Foundation is suggesting that U.S. Lawmakers are so intent on passing President Obama's "comprehensive health care reform" that they will use procedural maneuvers and trickery to accomplish it.
In an analysis posted on Human Events, Brian Darling, the Heritage Foundation's director of U.S. Senate relations, outlines a four-step scenario he believes is possible.
"Despite the potential political risks to moderate Democrats, the president and his left-wing leadership in Congress are determined to pass the measure using a rare parliamentary procedure," he said.
"The Senate plans to attach Obamacare to a House-passed non-healthcare bill," he warned. He explained that would take a simple majority vote once the discussion on a bill is opened, and it could be approved by the House also by a simple majority.
(Story continues below)
Bingo, a finished health care takeover en route to Obama's desk, he said.
This is evident because just last week the Senate Finance Committee refused an amendment by Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., that required the bill text and cost be available to the public for at least 72 hours before the Finance Committee votes.
Darling said the first step is that the Senate Finance Committee must approve a marked-up version of a takeover plan by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. Then, he wrote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., would announce two Senate committees have passed health care takeover plans to bring it to the floor.
Reid then would take the final products of the two committees, the other being from the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee, and merge them.
That puts Obamacare in the position of being ready, Darling wrote, "to hitch a ride on an unrelated bill from the House."
He said Reid then "will move to proceed to H.R. 1586, a bill to impose a tax on bonuses received by certain TARP recipients."
That has been approved by the House already, but has been wasting away in the Senate.
When that proposal gets 60 votes to start debate, "Reid will offer Obamacare as a complete substitute to the unrelated House-passed bill," Darling outlined. "This means that the entire healthcare reform effort will be included as an amendment to a TARP bill that has been collecting dust in the Senate for months."
The Senate's usually-required supermajority of 60 votes, 58 Democrats including moderates and the two independents, Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, would only have to hold together long enough to vote against any filibuster.
"Once the Senate takes up the bill, only a simple majority of members will be needed for passage," Darling warned. "It's possible one of the endangered moderate Democrats, such as Sen. Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), could vote to stop a filibuster then vote against Obamacare so as not to offend angry constituents."
He explained once approved by the Senate, the bill – already approved by the House in a different form – would be returned to the House where members simply would have to give it majority approval without changes.
On a Human Events forum page following Darling's article, one writer probably expressed the feelings of many Americans, "It is now time for 'We the people' to make such an uproar to our senators and representatives in the forms of phone calls, e-mails and letters that there is NO mistaking that we do not want this."
WorldNetDaily
Analyst: Democrat trickery to force Obamacare
Suggests maneuver will allow simple majority vote on health-industry takeover
Posted: October 01, 2009
6:01 PM Eastern
WorldNetDaily
An analyst whose responsibilities include working with members of the U.S. Senate for The Heritage Foundation is suggesting that U.S. Lawmakers are so intent on passing President Obama's "comprehensive health care reform" that they will use procedural maneuvers and trickery to accomplish it.
In an analysis posted on Human Events, Brian Darling, the Heritage Foundation's director of U.S. Senate relations, outlines a four-step scenario he believes is possible.
"Despite the potential political risks to moderate Democrats, the president and his left-wing leadership in Congress are determined to pass the measure using a rare parliamentary procedure," he said.
"The Senate plans to attach Obamacare to a House-passed non-healthcare bill," he warned. He explained that would take a simple majority vote once the discussion on a bill is opened, and it could be approved by the House also by a simple majority.
(Story continues below)
Bingo, a finished health care takeover en route to Obama's desk, he said.
This is evident because just last week the Senate Finance Committee refused an amendment by Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., that required the bill text and cost be available to the public for at least 72 hours before the Finance Committee votes.
Darling said the first step is that the Senate Finance Committee must approve a marked-up version of a takeover plan by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. Then, he wrote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., would announce two Senate committees have passed health care takeover plans to bring it to the floor.
Reid then would take the final products of the two committees, the other being from the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee, and merge them.
That puts Obamacare in the position of being ready, Darling wrote, "to hitch a ride on an unrelated bill from the House."
He said Reid then "will move to proceed to H.R. 1586, a bill to impose a tax on bonuses received by certain TARP recipients."
That has been approved by the House already, but has been wasting away in the Senate.
When that proposal gets 60 votes to start debate, "Reid will offer Obamacare as a complete substitute to the unrelated House-passed bill," Darling outlined. "This means that the entire healthcare reform effort will be included as an amendment to a TARP bill that has been collecting dust in the Senate for months."
The Senate's usually-required supermajority of 60 votes, 58 Democrats including moderates and the two independents, Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, would only have to hold together long enough to vote against any filibuster.
"Once the Senate takes up the bill, only a simple majority of members will be needed for passage," Darling warned. "It's possible one of the endangered moderate Democrats, such as Sen. Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), could vote to stop a filibuster then vote against Obamacare so as not to offend angry constituents."
He explained once approved by the Senate, the bill – already approved by the House in a different form – would be returned to the House where members simply would have to give it majority approval without changes.
On a Human Events forum page following Darling's article, one writer probably expressed the feelings of many Americans, "It is now time for 'We the people' to make such an uproar to our senators and representatives in the forms of phone calls, e-mails and letters that there is NO mistaking that we do not want this."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
