PLAME AND HUSBAND WILSON LIED NOT BUSH

President Bush has taken the heat of being called a liar and a war monger for 5 years while he kept his silence to protect the people of the world.

This is truly a display of selfless honor. On July 5, 2008, the Associated Press (AP) released a story titled:

Secret U.S. mission hauls uranium from Iraq. The opening paragraph is as follows:

The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.

See anything wrong with this picture? We have been hearing from the far-left for more than five years how, Bush lied.

Somehow, that slogan loses its credibility now that 550 metric tons of Saddam's yellowcake, used for nuclear weapon enrichment, has been discovered and shipped to Canada for its new use as nuclear energy.

It appears that American troops found the 550 metric tons of uranium in 2003 after invading Iraq. They had to sit on this information and the uranium itself, for fear of terrorists attempting to steal it.

It was guarded and kept safe by our military in a 23,000-acre site with large sand beams surrounding the site. This is vindication for the Bush administration, having been attacked mercilessly by the liberal media and the far-left pundits on the blogosphere.

Now that it is proven that President Bush did not lie about Saddam's nuclear ambitions, one would think the mainstream media would report the story.

Once the AP released the story, the mainstream media should have picked it up and broadcast it worldwide. This never happened, due in large part I believe, to the fact that the mainstream media would have to admit they were wrong about Bush's war motives all along.

Thankfully, the AP got it right when it said, The removal of 550 metric tons of yellowcake the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy.

Closing the book on Saddam's nuclear legacy. Did Saddam have a nuclear legacy after all? I thought Bush lied. As it turns out, the people who lied were Joe Wilson and his wife.

Valerie Plame engaged in a clear case of nepotism and convinced the CIA to send her husband on a fact finding mission in February 2002, seeking to determine if Saddam Hussein attempted to buy yellowcake from Niger.

The CIA and British intelligence believed Saddam contacted Niger for that purpose but needed proof. During his trip to Niger, Wilson actually interviewed the former prime minister of Niger, Ibrahim Assane Mayaki.

Mayaki told Wilson that in June of 1999, an Iraqi delegation expressed interest in 'expanding commercial relations' for the purposes of purchasing yellowcake.

Wilson chose to overlook Mayaki's remarks and reported to the CIA that there was no evidence of Hussein wanting to purchase yellowcake from Niger.

However, with British intelligence insisting the claim was true, President Bush used that same claim in his State of the Union address in January of 2003.

Outraged by Bush's insistence that the claim was true, Wilson wrote an op-ed in the New York Times in the summer of 2003 slamming Bush. Wilson did this in spite of the fact that Mayaki said Saddam did try to buy the yellowcake from Niger.

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence disagreed with Wilson and supported Mayaki's claim. This meant nothing to Wilson who was opposed to the Iraq war and thus had ulterior motives in covering up the prime minister's statements. It was a simple tactic really.

If the far-left and their friends in the media could prove Bush lied about Hussein wanting to purchase yellowcake from Niger, it would undermine President Bush's credibility and give them more cause for asking what other lies he may have told.

Yet, the real lie came from Wilson, who interpreted his own meaning from the prime minister's statements and concluded all by himself that the claim of Saddam attempting to purchase yellowcake was 'unequivocally wrong.'

Curiously, the CIA sat on this information and did not inform the CIA Director, who sided with Bush on the yellowcake claim.

This was made public in a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report in July 2004. Valerie Plame also engaged in her own lie campaign by spreading the notion that the Bush administration outed her as a CIA agent.

Never mind that it was Richard Armitage -- no friend of the Bush administration -- who leaked Plame's identity to the press. Never mind that Plame had not been in the field as a CIA agent in some six years.

The truth is, due to their opposition to the war, Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame, the mainstream media and their left-wing friends on the blogosphere engaged in a propaganda campaign to undermine the Bush administration.

Now that Saddam's uranium has been made public and is no longer a threat to the world, do you think these aforementioned parties will apologize and admit they were wrong? Don't count on it.

The rest of the American people should hear the truth about Saddam's uranium. It is up to you and me to inform them every chance we get. As far as the anti-war crowd is concerned, the next time they say that, 'Bush lied,' we should tell them to, 'Have the yellowcake and eat it too.'

This story was verified, if you want to check it for yourself, click on the links below. AND THE SHIPMENT WENT TO CANADA FOR THEIR USE !!!!!!!!

NOV 4 - DO WE LOSE MORE THAN AN ELECTION?

On November 4th, could we lose more than just an election?

By Christopher Cook

The most common corollary to Godwin's Law suggests that once you use Nazis or Hitler in an argument, you've lost. It's fair enough as a general axiom, but this law has a few unintended problems.

First, as Jonah Goldberg educates us in the truly riveting pages of Liberal Fascism, people regularly misdefine "fascism" to make it 100% synonymous with a totalitarian Hitlerism.

Goldberg shows us that this is a clumsy and inaccurate definition for a much more complex phenomenon. So, since many people define fascism in this way, some of them are also likely to apply Godwin's Law to the use of the word fascist as well as "Nazi," "Hitler," etc.

Thus, when I made a post titled Barack Obama is a 1920s-style fascist, there's little doubt that some would proclaim it an overwrought, Godwin-defiling post.

That, however, would be a clumsy criticism of what I think is a reasonable allusion.

The second problem, though, with Godwin's law is this:

Though admittedly rare, what if there is a comparison to actual Naziism that is actually apt? Does Godwin's law not get in the way of making such an observation?

There is a definite Hitler Youth vibe therein:

Paramilitary behaviors and trappings.

A group of children engaged in a regimented display of support for the great national leader.

Marching while chanting "alpha . . . omega" (a term which is usually reserved for God, thus playing into the idea of the great Obamessiah leading us all in under his national gleichschaltung)

YouTube Video was removed/scrubbed by Obama pressure but is available below the photo.....

No, it won't go away because someone scrubs it from part of the Internet, view the video below

I think it's more than reasonable to find this a little creepy.

Granted, the video was not directed by Leni Riefenstahl. However, if you add some lighting and music, change the location, and get some actors who are in a little better physical shape, you've got yourself something she could work with.

Granted, it's just a few kids in a small, nondescript room lit with dingy fluorescent lights. But that's just how the Nazis got started.

It's just how Lenin and his gang got started. First, it's just a few people with a vision meeting in dimly-lit rooms.

Then, they organize their local areas. Then they get the youth, and before you know it, they've got the country.

Next step: giant politico-economic killmonsters slaughtering 120 million people.

Granted, this is America, and we've got a special definer of protection against such things. Or do we?

Our version of this already happened during the Wilson administration.

And it was many of Wilson's people who ran the FDR administration. We're still feeling the ramifications of that, having taken a decidedly more socialist turn in those years.

Moreover, I know a few people who still think they're voting for FDR.

Wilson used state power to create an American fascism, and though forgotten now, it was terrible for many people at the time. It's one of the reasons why Harding's slogan "Back to Normalcy" was so appealing.

And thank God the nature of America was such that we could find our way back to normalcy again.

But what of today? What of this Obama phenomenon?

Barack Obama has terrorist friends (at home and abroad) and communist front groups working on his behalf.

He has allies at every layer of society who are willing to change rules, break laws, and flout procedures in order to bring him to power.

He has a media that is working on his behalf every bit as reliably as "Pravda" reported the party line in the USSR.

He is using state power to silence his critics.

He has requested that his followers "get in the faces" of his detractors, and he is getting his wish.

He has a vote fraud operation working on his behalf in states across America. This operation is aided by laws passed by his allies in Congress and supported by his allies in various states.

And now, Obama Youth groups are being formed.

This is all, it seems, far too reminiscent of how other movements have come to power in the past. I don't wish to sound too overwrought here, but the similarities are troubling.

Interestingly, a related point appeared in an email blast this morning. Michael Zak, in his post Those who do not remember the past are condemned to vote for Barack Obama, reminds us of Obama's point about America needing a "civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded" as our military.

At the time—latching on to the "just as well-funded" portion of the comment—most people wrote this off as silliness. After all, we devote a sizable share of our GDP on defense, spending, I've heard more than the next dozen or so nations combined. We're hardly likely to do that with any sort of new civilian force.

But don't focus on the logistics of it. Focus on the idea itself, and on the mind of the man who floated it.

Alan asks: will it be similar to islamic iran's Revolutionary Guards or their Bassiji Suppression forces?

Zak asks:

• What sort of people would be in this paramilitary force? •

What sort of weapons would they have?•

Who would command them?•

Would they be subordinate to the U.S. military?•

Would they be subordinate to the police?•

What would be the purpose of this paramilitary force? • What would it do?

WHO IS OBAMA AND FROM WHENCE DID HE COME?

The REAL Obama

http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20080904.htm

The Official Obama

http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20080921.htm

PSYCHOANALYSIS OF OBAMA - IS HE HIDING OFFICIAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS ABOUT HIM?

Click on title and scroll down the page which starts with a photo of Obama

OBAMA'S COCKROACHES

Like cockroaches...Obama supporters emerge from dark, sewage-invested recesses.


Here are some facts to consider:


Obama Contributors Emerged from Staff and Boards of Annenberg GranteesWednesday, October 15, 2008By Fred Lucas, Staff Writer

CNSNews.com) – Barack Obama started serving as chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, an education grant program, in 1995, the same year he was elected to the Illinois state Senate. As chairman, Obama oversaw the disbursement of $49.2 million in Annenberg grants, most of which went to non-profit groups with the stated intent of improving Chicago’s public schools.

Since the start of his political career, Obama has received a total of $331,528 in campaign contributions from people who served as staff and board members of non-profit groups that received grants from the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC).

FULL STORY AT:

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=37589

SNOPES LIES

SNOPES!!

Just forwarding. I checked out the site that is recommended (http://truthandfiction.com/) in place of Snopes, and it said it was under construction. That's all I know.

"Check Snopes -out. Now you know"I have recently discovered that Snopes.com is owned by a flaming liberal and this man is in the tank for Obama. There are many things they have listed on their site as a hoax and yet you can go to Youtube yourself and find the video of Obama actually saying these things. So you see, you cannot and should not trust Snopes.com....ever for anything that remotely resembles truth! I don't even trust them to tell me if email chains are hoaxes anymore.

"A few conservative speakers on Myspace told me about snopes.com a few months ago and I took it upon myself to do a little research to find out if it was true. Well, I found out for myself that it is true. This website is backing Obama and is covering up for him. They will say anything that makes him look bad is a hoax and they also tell lies on the other side about McCain and Palin.

"Anyway just FYI please don't use Snopes.com anymore for fact checking and make your friends aware of their political leanings as well. Many people still think Snopes.com is neutral and they can be trusted as factual. We need to make sure everyone is aware that that is a hoax in itself."This is just a forward!

======

DENYING AND DENYING

>General Eisenhower Warned Us > >>>>>

It is a matter of history that when>Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, General Dwight>Eisenhower, found the victims of the death camps he ordered>all possible photographs to be taken, and for the German>people from surrounding villages to be ushered through the>camps and even made to bury the dead.>>

He did this because he said in words to this>effect:>>'Get it all on record now - get the films - get the witnesses -because somewhere>down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that>this never happened'

>>This week, the UK removed The Holocaust from its school curriculum>because it 'offended' the Muslim population which claims it never occurred. >

This is a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and>how easily each country is giving into it.>>

It is now more than 60 years after>the Second World War in Europe ended. This e-mail>is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory of the,
>> 6 million>Jews,
>>20 million>Russians,
>>10 million>Christians,>and
>>1,900 Catholic>priests
>>who were 'murdered, raped, burned, starved,>beat, experimented on and humiliated' while the German>people looked the other way!

>>Now, more than ever, with Iran , among others,>claiming the Holocaust to be 'a myth,' it is imperative to>make sure the world never forgets.

>This e-mail is intended to reach 400>million people! Be a link in the memorial chain and help>distribute this around the world.

>>How many years will it be before the attack on the World Trade Center ,>>>'NEVER>HAPPENED'>>>> >>>>because it offends
some Muslim in the U.S. ??????

How much longer will it take to forget the calamity of an Obama presidency if that tragedy for the USA were to happen.